Vs

Background: /r/straighttransgirls is where the s of the Blaire White variety go to rant, away from their overwhelmingly transbian ("it's maam!") counterparts.

OP wonders if these euphoria boners often discussed on the main trans subs are real or are just a terf psyop. Commenters proceed to fight over:

• AGP is a fake term and transphobic to even mention

• AGP is real but it's perfectly fine

• boners indicate transbians are just fetishizing perverts

• it's fine to get boners over spinny skirts…not sexual at all

Excerpt:

[–]AbsolutelyRidic 7 points 23 days ago

[euphoria boners] normal things that happen if you have a peepee, aren't taking estrogen yet, and aren't constantly miserable.

[–]Pink_T-Goddess 0 points 23 days ago

Oh shut up gurl.. stop making stuff up.. I didn't experience this so called "euphoric boner" even when I haven't transitioned back then and was just starting on Estrogen... I literally have fluctuating libido but I don't get a "boner" by the sight of me looking like a very beautiful woman.. This is not a thing, you guys are just making it up to cover your fetishes... Having a fetish is not a bad thing but don't lump is in with you.. Don't treat our existence as the same as your existence...

More coping seething and coping again in the comments.

I'm working on my magnum opus of foid hating. I'm going to be a little light on the rightoid patrolling until the work is finished. my days consist of getting wasted and finishing my work.

Long story short, I met a guy from grindr 10 years older than me. He was the daddy type.

He said he needed the money because he was short on rent. Which wasn't a lot. I was hesitant because I hadn't done it before, but I thought he was also kinda into the fun, but with extra money.

When I came to his place, he looked like he was really struggling. I asked him if he was okay, and he said yes. I gave him a bj and paid him. He really looked like he regretted doing it, being paid for s*x because he had no other choice.

I told him it was just a friendly gift instead, and he didn't have to treat it like a transaction.

I am so guilty. How am I different from a grapist or a mol*ster? I had s*x with someone not from their own will. I didn't enjoy it. I didn't enjoy it at all. I feel disgusted.

I texted him if he wanted to just pay me back in the future and treat it separate from our s*x transaction. But he blocked me already.

EDIT: when i said struggling, i meant struggling financially

https://old.reddit.com/r/IsraelPalestine/comments/1ic4bxy/israelsupporters_do_you_have_empathy/

Hamas

https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1ic9ubp/the_current_fascist_panic_from_the_left_is_both/

Conservatives somehow find their butt

https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1ic9ubp/the_current_fascist_panic_from_the_left_is_both/

https://old.reddit.com/r/suppressed_news/comments/1ic46ji/interesting_footage_has_surfaced_showing_

Redditards love their fanfiction

https://old.reddit.com/r/IsraelPalestine/comments/1icpj3i/a_theory_behind_the_morbid_fantasies_zionists_of/

Gays go splat when they hit the ground

https://old.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/1icu87h/the_world_is_laughing_at_america/

Looks like Berlin needs more bombing

https://old.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1ic92rb/that_ratio_is_brutal/

Clever comebacks?

https://old.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/comments/1ic4sfm/interesting_footage_has_surfaced_showing_an/

A reminder that all redditards are low functioning psychopaths and should be sterilized so they won't molest their children

A foreign billionaire has seized the United States government.

— DCCC (@dccc) February 3, 2025

Is he a foreigner from Canada? Or Africa?

Bonus video here's Elon with his McLaren F1 and his ex wife of his child

A new campaign group for gay and bisexual rights but not transgender rights has been formed in the Labour Party https://t.co/UOom4e5Wtb

— LabourList (@LabourList) February 13, 2025

A new campaign group for gay and bisexual rights but not transgender rights has been formed in the Labour Party.

Labour LGB aims to "defend and enhance the rights of LGB people" whilst also calling for protections for single-s*x spaces and "supporting the principles that same-s*x attraction is real and that biology matters".

It comes as another rival group to LGBT+ Labour, Pride in Labour, held its first annual general meeting last weekend and called on the party to deliver on its manifesto commitment to implement meaningful reform to the Gender Recognition Act.

Dee McCullough, a spokesperson for Labour LGB, said: "We are a coalition of proud Labour Party LGB members.

"The last Labour government delivered a raft of landmark reforms that we celebrate. Civil partnerships, equal age of consent, equal employment rights, adoption law reform and abolishing Section 28 to name a few. In the years ahead, we need to be vigilant in maintaining these rights. We must defend the Equality Act which spelled out that sexual orientation is a protected characteristic.

"We want to ensure that the Labour government continues to accept that same-s*x attraction is real and that biology matters. These principles must be embedded in legislative proposals and in government policy.

"We would encourage Labour Party LGB members to join Labour LGB. In the ongoing debate about LGB rights within the party, the voices of LGB people must be heard in branches, CLPs, at party conference and in Parliament. The campaign for equality never ends."

The move comes amid claims that the government is shelving a manifesto commitment to make it easier for people to legally change their gender, with a party source telling The Guardian that changes may not be brought forward before the next general election.

The Prime Minister's spokesperson told reporters the government "stands by our commitment to modernise gender recognition rules as set out in the manifesto and we'll set out our next steps on this work in due course."

'No LGB without the T', says rival LGBT+ group

Some LGBTQ+ groups within the party have spoken out over the formation of Labour LGB, claiming it aims to "divide the LGBT+ community" within the party.

Alex Charilaou, co-chair of Labour for Trans Rights, said: "The values of the labour movement are those of equality, social justice and solidarity. This new group's plans to divide the LGBT+ community in Labour will not work.

"Trans people are at the frontline of a wider reactionary culture war. Gay, lesbian, bi and other LGBT+ people recognise that their rights are just as under threat from growing far-right attacks as the trans community.

"We hope LGBT+ Labour will disavow this group as antithetical to the aims of the LGBT+ rights movement and the Labour Party."

Co-chair of the Pride for Labour group Jamie Strudwick called on the Labour leadership to "act immediately to protect trans people before we go past the point of no return".

"Pride in Labour exists to champion LGBTQIA+ rights within the Labour Party. We are utterly appalled that a new splinter group, Labour LGB, is seeking to capitalise on the vile transphobia which is so deeply embedded within our society.

"We will always be extremely clear on this ‒ there is no LGB without the T.

"We are at an extremely dangerous crossroads where trans people and their right to exist is being brought into question, and we cannot allow this sickening cycle to continue.

"Be under no illusion ‒ the vast majority of gay, lesbian and bisexual people stand firmly with trans people, because they have always been, and always will be part of our family."

In response, McCullough said: "We are proud to be Labour and proud to be LGB. Our aim is to represent people who are same-s*x attracted."

LGBT+ Labour gave no comment when approached by LabourList.

https://old.reddit.com/r/DownSouth/comments/1idqqg9/rwanda_vs_south_africa/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78w1ze7v25o

!africans !brics

Developing AI regulation before developing AI models and then bragging about it is the most EU thing ever pic.twitter.com/qyd6dgTxjE

— Lina Seiche (@LinaSeiche) January 27, 2025

🚨 #BREAKING - RAW 60 MINUTES INTERVIEW with Kamala Harris during the election released... TRANSCRIPT in reply... pic.twitter.com/dYneIEPqQu

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 5, 2025

Like for real nafo presence died by a lot after USAID stoped Jfl

Zhonggup grows stronger

BREAKING: Tesla now provides a discount of up to 10% on Tesla Insurance for customers who frequently use FSD (Supervised)

"The more you drive with FSD (Supervised) enabled, the bigger the discount is on your insurance premium." This new policy is currently only for Tesla… pic.twitter.com/Fjh0GT2fCB

— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) February 2, 2025

This totally won't backfire lol

https://www.tesla.com/support/insurance/fsd-discount#available

Related discussion:

https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/tesla-insurance-now-offering-10-discount-for-owners-who-use-fsd-for-50-or-more-of-driving-miles.35591/

Starting now, the more you use FSD the less you’ll pay for Tesla Insurance.

Essentially Tesla is covering part of the cost of insurance when you use FSD https://t.co/Q7QT07PZkf

— Whole Mars Catalog (@WholeMarsBlog) February 2, 2025

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m8ytrgt/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m91gpzx/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m8z13p3/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m90r1fs/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m8yxg47/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m8z4yvk/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1i93wkp/comment/m8z13tt/?context=8

!crossword

LA Times, Sunday, Feb 2, 2025 - "Silent Partners"

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947069-fect

SOLVED

NY Times, Sunday, Feb 2, 2025 - "Two-for-One Special"

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947074-vesk

SOLVED

LA Times, Saturday, Feb 1, 2025

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947079-jank

SOLVED

NY Times, Saturday, Feb 1, 2025

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947081-sphob

SOLVED

The Crossword: Monday, Jan 27, 2025 (New Yorker, thought I would try this. Mondays are the hardest puzzles in the New Yorker)

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947101-troff

SOLVED

Daily Cryptic Crossword (2025-02-02) (this is British but also pretty easy cryptics)

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947077-treb

SOLVED (BARELY)

MORE NEW YORKER CROSSWORDS AFTER

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947660-plash

SOLVED

https://downforacross.com/beta/game/6947719-sunt

SOLVED

THANKS FOR PLAYING

!winchads !wincels !winners

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘

It's funny how woke/SJW are posting on all these places thinking that anyone has the wherewithall to actually read any of it. I don't give a crap about DEI, all I care about is who has the best product and the best price for it.What's more interesting though is the psychological mentality for people thinking this is somehow useful. It's not, all I care about is product and price. This is same train of "organic" food which failed because the real issue isn't DEI but economics for normal families. (-44)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

No one mentioned DEI, I just said I didn't want to support MAGA. No one will have the best price shortly.And the best way, and most American way to vote has, and always will be, vote with your wallet. I'm voting with mine. (19)

Just replace DEI with MAGA. Still don't care. The only thing I hate about MAGA is the tarriff/inflation which hits our wallets. Let's stay focused on the real goal here. (-23)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Craziness don't go away easily. Kirkland is in the middle of liberal population. You have nothing to worry about. Move on with your life. (-19)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

So are you a capitalist or a constitutionalist.In your world, I am responsible for not only voting my conscience, but am then responsible for the economic stability of people who express ideals that are inimical to my belief systems. Under that logic, I am being punished for valuing things like free speech (if Musk is a special government employee, and he's actively banning political views from X, then this is a violation of my rights), separation of church and state, equal rights, etc.The moral gymnastics you are doing here is amazing. You've said it yourself, you really don't care, as long as people take care of your business by shopping at it. That's unbelievably selfish and completely morally vapid. (0)

are the two mutually exclusive?Didn't say you're responsible for others, but I did point out the harm that you'd cause (it would take a LARGE group of boycotters to have an impact, so when I say "you" I mean the entire r/kirkland subreddit) and the futility of your efforts (ya aint gonna change anybody's mind, but you will most likely entrench them). I can't tell you what to do, but I can let you know how stupid and futile it is.I think you misread. I pointed out the harm a boycott would do to businesses - not only the target's business but affiliated businesses and employees. And while it could include my business, the point I was making is the interconnectivity of all of us in this community. So how much collateral damage do you think is acceptable to punish someone for legally and constitutionally exercising their right to vote?Again, boycott criminals, child male feminists, and real Nazis. But when one group of people tries to punish another group for voting in their own self-interest,... (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

If a business posts QANON or MAGA paraphernalia at this point in the game they are advertising that they support an openly fascist regime. Where do you draw the line? (0)

What do you think will happen? If you boycott Spud Fish & Chips* because the owner voted for Trump, which do you think is more likely:a - The owner sits in a dark room with a glass of scotch and re-assess his life and choices. He thinks, "wow, maybe I AM wrong and I shoulda voted for Kamala"b - as sales at Spud Fish and Chips take a 10% hit, he lays off two employees and reduces his orders from local food and supplies vendors. He has no idea why sales have dropped because all the people who disagree with him ARENT engaging with him - they're boycotting. All he knows is what FOX news tells him, and he blames it on Bob Ferguson's climate policies. * I HAVE NO IDEA HOW THE OWNER OF SPUD VOTES! I'm just using him/her as an example. Anyway, boycott child male feminists. Boycott real, avowed racists and Nazis. But don't boycott people who are exercising their Constitutional right to have an opinion (no matter how misinformed it may be) and to vote on it. Because that's waaaayyy too close to firi... (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Calm down my dude, I'm just asking for info to be more conscious in my decision making, as most commenters agree lol. (3)

And I'm agreeing!! HATE!! HATE!!! HATE!! Let's do this shit!!! (-3)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/goggleblock

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+5🐮)

Number of comments: 14

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

wo

“chubby” https://t.co/qZ0DJa106e pic.twitter.com/SoEOfaFWS0

— Dollster 🩷 #stopdollstercism (@TheBittyMaster) February 12, 2025

There is a lot of sneed all over the place about her but I don't like reading fat people's posts. If you find more I'll edit them here

!g*mers

🇬🇧 Meanwhile in London

“He’s got a knife, he’s got a knife”

Man burns Quran on the Streets & is quickly attacked by a knife wielding maniac pic.twitter.com/lEK9nO6Zw3

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) February 14, 2025

!britbongs

!ummah

Several notable meetings between China and Ukraine and statements made during interviews indicate that Beijing is actively interested in the peace process and is open to cooperation with Kyiv. China is also positioning itself for post-war reconstruction efforts and potential…

— Tatarigami_UA (@Tatarigami_UA) February 17, 2025

xQc hit back at Pokimane's claim only "white men" didn't understand Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl performance

"The point of a halftime show isn’t to give the world some puzzle to figure out." pic.twitter.com/EyC9fVNJGG

— Dexerto (@Dexerto) February 11, 2025

xQc responds to Pokimane’s claim that “only white people” disliked Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl half-time performance because they failed to understand it’s deeper meaning

“The point of a half-time show isn’t to give the world some puzzle to figure out” pic.twitter.com/yyUPSQKDnW

— FearBuck (@FearedBuck) February 10, 2025

"Only white people hated it. I didn't want to say it…"

Pokimane reaction to people saying that Kendrick Lamar didn't deserve to perform at the Super Bowl LIX halftime show pic.twitter.com/fGH57NAUCc

— ryan 🤿 (@scubaryan_) February 10, 2025

It's from the Daily Beast and I don't see it mention anywhere about an insider at the Kremlin.

Either way...let's see how Redditors are taking the "news"...