xD

I'm sensing that horror game invented a genre. Someone is working on a femboy clone.

Death Stranding 2 and GoY are about the only things likely to be featured that I'd care about. Maybe Kingdom Hearts IV out of morbid curiosity to see if it has Star Wars in it. Some people think Bloodborne could get something since it's the 10th anniversary this year and Snoy have been DMCA happy about it lately but idk.

Sadly they will not execute Herman Hulst live on-stream so there's my only hopes dashed.

the U-2 is so frickin' cool

American jobs 👍
Deportation 👍
Lower taxes 👍
Invade, occupy, rebuild gaza... wait wait wait what? Lol

Soo umm? #freePalestine to the river and sea, whatever commie slogan they say.... pic.twitter.com/o0n6qMk9CY

— Sean Strickland (@SStricklandMMA) February 11, 2025

Beginning in 2020, Tinajero started communicating with, and grooming, several minor victims to obtain sexually explicit content from them, including Jane Doe 1. In 2023, Tinajero began to threaten the safety of Jane Doe 1 and her family. Tinajero posted online in encrypted platforms associated with 764 and related groups a "Lorebook" – commonly used in 764 blackmail schemes — containing Jane Doe 1's identifying information along with nude pictures of the minor.

Between July 2023 and September 2023, during multiple discussions over social media, Tinajero and a co-conspirator agreed that Tinajero should kill Jane Doe 1. Tinajero and the co-conspirator specifically discussed that Tinajero should murder Jane Doe 1 and dispose of Jane Doe 1's body in a barrel of acid after the murder. Tinajero posted multiple messages on various social media websites stating that he planned to kill Jane Doe 1 with a firearm because Jane Doe 1 refused to provide additional child sexual abuse material.

On Aug. 26, 2023, Tinajero posted on Telegram, "Im determined to die" and "If I gotta kill her I can't let her live and f**k with dudes and girls while I'm sick and miserable" and "Im gonna live stream it." Tinajero also posted a picture of Jane Doe 1. On Sept. 2, 2023, Tinajero posted on Telegram, "I wanna kill them so bad just show up at their cribs and shoot 100 rounds in 5 seconds" and, on Sept. 3, 2023, posted "I didn't wanna do anything bc I was scared of dying or prison but now I'm determined to die if I have to after getting rid of [Jane Doe 1] . . . ." Tinajero also began soliciting others to assist with attempting to kill Jane Doe 1.

the hate i feel for you cannot be expressed in words https://t.co/QitlEVvgNk

— . (@heshidicjudaism) February 12, 2025

Moments ago Doxbin was compromised.

A group named "Tooda" has taken credit for the compromise.

In summary, administrative staff from Doxbin got into a verbal altercation with members of Tooda. Doxbin administration accused a Tooda member of being a pedophile.

Tooda retaliated… pic.twitter.com/aTIDodUfva

— vx-underground (@vxunderground) February 12, 2025

don't wanna link anything to make sure this abides with the rules and out of respect for the people extorted by the doxbin admins. there's probably a thread somewhere explaining the huge mess with the current owners if this topic piques your interest. there's around 500 entries, if I remember correctly they charged $100 for a removal, that means they made ~$50,000. sneako was one of the names mentioned, I did a quick look through and couldn't find anything else.

Have you heard of Cleo?

Cleo was an account on Math Stack Exchange that was infamous for dropping the answer to the most difficult integrals with no explanation...

often mere minutes after the question was asked!!

For years, no one knew who Cleo was, UNTIL NOW! pic.twitter.com/wbvYMSVnHG

— Tanishq Mathew Abraham, Ph.D. (@iScienceLuvr) February 17, 2025

pic.twitter.com/Nag7scYxDP

— 의코 (@ui2ko) February 9, 2025

The US and the UK have refused to sign a declaration on "inclusive and sustainable" artificial intelligence at a landmark Paris summit, in a blow to hopes for a concerted approach to developing and regulating the technology.

The communique states that priorities include "ensuring AI is open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and trustworthy, taking into account international frameworks for all" and "making AI sustainable for people and the planet".

The document was backed by 60 other signatories on Tuesday, including France, China, India, Japan, Australia and Canada.

A UK government spokesperson said the statement had not gone far enough in addressing global governance of AI and the technology's impact on national security.

"We agreed with much of the leaders' declaration and continue to work closely with our international partners. This is reflected in our signing of agreements on sustainability and cybersecurity today at the Paris AI Action summit," the spokesperson said. "However, we felt the declaration didn't provide enough practical clarity on global governance, nor sufficiently address harder questions around national security and the challenge AI poses to it."

Confirmation of the snub came soon after the US vice-president, JD Vance, took to the stage at the Grand Palais to criticise Europe's "excessive regulation" of technology and warn against cooperating with China.

Asked if Britain had declined to sign because it wanted to follow the US lead, Keir Starmer's spokesperson said they were "not aware of the US reasons or position" on the declaration. A government source rejected the suggestion that Britain was trying to curry favour with the US.

But a Labour MP said: "I think we have little strategic room but to be downstream of the US." They added that US AI firms could stop engaging with the UK government's AI Safety Institute, a world-leading research body, if Britain was perceived to be taking an overly restrictive approach to the development of the technology.

Campaign groups criticised the UK's decision and said it risked damaging its reputation in this area. Andrew Dudfield, the head of AI at Full Fact, said the UK risked "undercutting its hard-won credibility as a world leader for safe, ethical and trustworthy AI innovation" and that there needed to be "bolder government action to protect people from corrosive AI-generated misinformation".

Gaia Marcus, director of the Ada Lovelace Institute, which focuses on AI research, said the UK's actions "go against the vital global governance that AI needs."

The Élysée Palace said more countries might sign the declaration in the hours after the two-day summit.

Vance's hard-hitting speech, in front of leaders including the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, indicated dissatisfaction with the global approach to regulating and developing the technology. Starmer did not attend the summit.

Vance, in his first trip abroad as US vice-president, warned against the EU's regulatory approach, stating that "excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry".

He added: "We need international regulatory regimes that foster the creation of AI technology rather than strangle it, and we need our European friends, in particular, to look to this new frontier with optimism rather than trepidation."

Two other EU regulatory measures, the Digital Services Act and GDPR, also received passing criticism from Vance, who did not stay for the leaders' group photo after his speech. Singling out the DSA, which regulates social media, the vice-president said: "It is one thing to prevent a predator from preying on a child on the internet. And it is something quite different to prevent a grown man or woman from accessing an opinion that the government thinks is misinformation."

Vance also referred to the risks of partnering with "authoritarian" regimes, in a pointed allusion to China – without mentioning the country directly. Referring to exports of CCTV and 5G equipment – key Chinese tech products – by authoritarian governments, he said there was a cost: "Partnering with such regimes, it never pays off in the long term."

As the Chinese vice-premier, Zhang Guoqing, sat yards away, Vance added: "Some of us in this room have learned from experience partnering with them means chaining your nation to an authoritarian master that seeks to infiltrate, dig in and seize your information infrastructure. Should a deal seem too good to be true, just remember the old adage that we learned in Silicon Valley, if you aren't paying for the product: you are the product."

Vance started his speech by cautioning against an excessive focus on safety, in an apparent criticism of the first global AI summit in the UK in 2023, which was badged as the AI Safety Summit. He indicated that he thought the Bletchley Park meeting was too cautious, referring to gatherings about cutting-edge technology that can be "too self-conscious, too risk averse".

!aichads

Israeli Minister of Defense, Israel Katz states that today’s announcement by Hamas, that they will not following through with Saturday’s hostage exchange, is a “complete violation of the ceasefire agreement and the deal to release the hostages.” With him further stating, “I have…

— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) February 10, 2025

!jidf

I can't even

Convince him to shut up about people over-reacting to the fact of the fascism and quit evaluating whether or not it is fascism because you only model confusion. We already know everything we need to know: it's definitely fascism and must be stopped. His equivocation on the matter is a liability, and that liability is on account of his age.

His poor judgment is not unusual.

But it is public.

And you are Writers, are you not?

Hit him. Nonviolence is yet