Never thought I'd have someone blowing up my phone

!chuds tired of winning yet?

!r-slurs

A small selection of posts:

https://old.reddit.com/r/BambooBabble/comments/1imnac2/the_comments_are_still_up/

https://old.reddit.com/r/BambooBabble/comments/1ikuok8/so_so_so_tight/

https://old.reddit.com/r/BambooBabble/comments/1hqglxa/immediately_banned/

https://old.reddit.com/r/BambooBabble/comments/1idpbta/cry_baby_maybe_put_your_tits_away_this_is_a/

My gf, my dog and I are living in our car, this is gonna fing suck.

Thanks to lots of nice clevelanders we have blankets and coats but man, Im stressed

So stressed I can make this post on Reddit tee-hee!

First, it is simply false to say that treasury payments do not have a "payment categorization code". It is notable, by the way, that he uses this completely invented phrase rather than the actual phrase "Treasury Account Symbol" (TAS). Indeed, it's impossible to find another use of this phrase using an internet search engine in any context, let alone the Treasury context. The far more limited "deficiency" pointed out by the Government Accountability Office report Krause referenced is that information about individual government transactions were recorded in multiple different account entries separately by some government agencies and thus individual transactions could not be readily traced through to all the accounting ledgers they effected.

No chud, the government doesn't need to note where it's spending your money and it was definitely working on a system to fix that by 2028 possibly

On to Musk's next claim: the need for "rationales". The idea of putting a "rationale" for each and every individual payment (or payment file) makes little sense in the context of how the system works. Think of this in your own life: do you fill out a little form that provides your "rationale" for purchasing an item every time you swipe your credit card? If you were required to do so, you would react very negatively for the same reason you should react very negatively here: if you had to put a rationale then someone could reject your spending requests on the basis of providing the "wrong" rationale.

Imagine the right wing uproar when the possibility emerged of restricting purchases of meat through such a "rationale for transaction" system. This should be seen as no different. The "Treasury Account Symbol" (TAS) provides the only rationale that should matter which is that congress appropriated the spending. Of course, if you want to abrogate congressional spending then that is obviously not sufficient and, in fact, counterproductive.

No chud, the government doesn't need to note why it's spending your money

Imagine if the government were buying some groceries and the government's credit card was rejected at the checkout, chud, that would be terrible. What if the government imposed fascist restrictions on you, chud, how would you feel?

This all goes back to Musk's tendency to think that there is, can be or should be a "button" that determines all of this and its corrupt, inefficient bureaucrats preventing this from happening. He simply doesn't understand how complex these systems are or why they are the way they are. Take the Treasury Offset Program (TOP) for instance. It is a Bureau of the Fiscal Service system for collecting delinquent federal or state debts. One former Bureau of the Fiscal Service employee explained to me that there are rules that determine:

Actually, chud, the bureaucratic tumour is a good thing and hasn't metastasized enough

To include my own editorial comment for a moment, this is why it's so alarming to see him talk about updating this list "weekly, or even daily". This strongly suggests to me that he is talking about arbitrarily and rapidly expanding the list of people and entities on lists such as the Office of Foreign Assets Controls (OFAC) list without any due process to block them from government payments. As I discussed the Wednesday before last, the apparatuses for capriciously destroying the financial life of disfavored entities and people has been constructed over multiple decades with active Democratic participation and support. Now they are in the hands of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Thus, again, Musk's comments hide a desire for unchecked power over others under a false narrative about governmental "inefficiency".

My sources are also very skeptical that any career Treasury employee told Elon Musk that half of the expenditures that constituted "entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN" were "unequivocal and obvious fraud". It's hard to say more without knowing the context. This is the difficult thing with government by the pronouncement of Elon Musk. He can say stuff without any corroboration much faster than anyone else can check facts or correct falsehoods.

There's no fraud chud, my sources are 'skeptical'

In the meantime, it is exhausting how much effort is required to deconstruct one Elon Musk tweet. He can lie about very complex and technical systems much faster than he can be answered, but nevertheless it's important to periodically critically assess what the richest man in the world is saying as he continually tries to justify chopping the government up and selling it for parts like this is a private equity takeover.

Actually Musk is just lying, chud

HERE WE GO!

Pro-Palestinian protesters react as Trump announces U.S. takeover of Gaza.

"GAZA IS NOT FOR SALE!!!"
pic.twitter.com/3xg5y8Kxiq

— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) February 5, 2025

Good thing no one is buying it then

Thinking about the time my gf casually mentioned that it defeats the purpose of wearing diamonds for them to be conflict-free, because then they don’t contain souls https://t.co/8FV6nALfrB

— Voyage of the Meme (@fleshsimulator) February 15, 2025

!Meowr !alligatorfrickhouse !babykillers

“chubby” https://t.co/qZ0DJa106e pic.twitter.com/SoEOfaFWS0

— Dollster 🩷 #stopdollstercism (@TheBittyMaster) February 12, 2025

There is a lot of sneed all over the place about her but I don't like reading fat people's posts. If you find more I'll edit them here

!g*mers

I said ignore

pic.twitter.com/cSYjh2qCqh

— Rock solid (@ShitpostRock) February 15, 2025

Must be a special level of gigacuck to play Destiny 2 in current year +8

pic.twitter.com/PJqRayF7PH

— 🇬🇧 𝙔𝙊𝙊𝙆𝘼𝙔 𝘼𝙀𝙎𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙏𝙄𝘾𝙎 🇬🇧 (@MythoYookay) February 17, 2025

!britbongs

!sophistry

Oh look it’s the study that shows conservatives are sociopaths that all of them are too stupid to understand https://t.co/XaaQLxxCLi

— evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) February 14, 2025

The “Socialists should go to the gym” discourse has me thinking about being a teenager and saving my friend’s life after he got stabbed in the chest 1/4” from his heart. These people have never been in any actual violent situation ever in their entire lives

— thomas 🛠 gazafunds.com/all (@t_NYC) February 13, 2025

!them !sigmastacies !they !male feminists !fellas

KFC is moving their HQ from Kentucky to Texas pic.twitter.com/8ZE1oqq1B9

— Dexerto (@Dexerto) February 19, 2025

I 24(f) was speaking to a man for about over a week now, I've been really insecure my whole life and avoided men entirely. Only just these past few months have I started to go on dating apps and speak to guys, I've not really found anyone I've been interested in until last week. I really got along with this guy, common interests and thought I was beautiful etc. In the beginning of the convo I was very clear that I'm plus size and if he's not into that that's completely fine, and he was bigger himself and emphasised that he was completely fine with my size and attracted to me. I also said that I'm not into being fetishised, he didn't drop any hints that he was into that.

We had a date tomorrow, to get coffee together. And today, after I've done my nails and toes, took a full body shower, plucked my eyebrows, used my hair and skincare that I reserve for special occasions and I was even going to bake him some cookies to try that we spoke about. He then sent me a long message about how he's into feederism and that he understands it's not for everyone and he likes me for me not his kink etc. I feel so humiliated. I feel gross and I feel like all security and confidence I had has just been destroyed. I really thought I found someone that liked me for ME myself, not because I'm fat. I sent him a voice note saying that I was clear I'm not into his fetish, and he had the opportunity to tell me then no? But instead he's told me just before our date.

I really feel like all my trust in potential partners has completely gone. I'm a really sceptical person usually, and it took so much time for him to break down my walls all to end up doing that. I hate feeders, and I hate my body for attracting them too.

!foidmoment !goyslopenjoyers !ranchers