- LoggedOutNoEmail: Watch rightoids blame covid/trans/onlineClass/bardfinn every1 except themselves
Lets see if this goes anywhere...
Now watch this drive.
- ticktockwarrior: rughtoid agendapost
The comic opens Ricky Gervais: SuperNature, which was released on Netflix on Tuesday (24 May), with a 15-minute-long segment about trans people and “cancel culture”.
“The worst thing you can say today is:’ Women don’t have penises’, right?” Gervais says in the special. “Now, no one saw that coming … We didn’t think we f**king had to.”
Just as he did with his 2018 Netflix special Humanity, Gervais uses SuperNature to hit back at critics who have slammed him for his over-reliance on cheap jokes about trans people by cracking more cheap jokes about trans people.
From AIDS to gender-affirming healthcare, Gervais “jokes” at the LGBTQ+ community’s expense throughout the show.
“Women,” he says, “I mean, the old-fashioned ones. The old-fashioned women. Oh God! You know, the ones with wombs. Those f**king dinosaurs.”
There are many reasons why a cis woman might not have a womb. About one in 5,000 women are born without a uterus because of a condition known as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser, others have them removed for various medical reasons.
But Gervais is more concerned with trans women.
“No, I love the new women. They’re great, aren’t they?” he says. “The new ones we’ve been seeing lately. The ones with beards and c**ks. They’re as good as gold, I love them.”.
Ricky Gervais spends Netflix special tearing into ‘trendy’ trans people
After turning his attention to trans women’s access to public toilets – “What if he rapes me? What if she rapes you? You f**king TERF whore” – Gervais began attacking so-called cancel culture.
Using Kevin Hart as an example, Gervais claims the “dominant mob” decide who can be “cancelled” and that people can no longer “joke” about “identity politics”.
Hart was due to host the Academy Awards in 2019 until his historic homophobic tweets resurfaced. He initially refused to apologise but did so after being pressured to step down.
Despite claiming he’s no longer allowed to punch down, Gervais spends much of the special punching down at trans people.
“Ironically” struggling to name “female comedians” during the opening jokes, Gervais names Eddie Izzard to laughs from the audience.
“She’s brilliant, isn’t she?” Gervais says. “She’s not only a great comedienne, she’s also a great actress, isn’t she?
“She was brilliant in that thing as that man.”
Wondering what life would be if he were a teenager in these “woke times”, Gervais, of course, says he would “self-ID” as trans because he is “trendy”. He also cracks jokes about gender-affirming healthcare.
“I’d have a big f***y,” he says, adding: “I’d be a real woman … I’d be a little lesbian fella called Vicky Gervais.
“I’d probably be a butch lesbian ’cause of all the testosterone till then.”
It’s far from the firs time Gervais has resorted to relying on anti-trans “jokes” for his comedy.
In 2016 he was criticised for taking shots at Caitlyn Jenner while hosting the Golden Globes. Two years later, in his first Netflix special, he spent 15 minutes rehashing the controversy while deadnaming multiple times Jenner.
In SuperNature, Gervais claims that his comedic style is to “pretend” such gags are his views.
“OK, full disclosure, in real life, of course, I support trans rights,” Gervais says.
“I support all human rights and trans rights are human rights. Live your best life. Use your preferred pronoun.”
Trans viewers – if any – would find this hard to believe as seconds later Gervais adds: “But meet me halfway, ladies. Lose the c**k. That’s all I’m saying.”
Hello again! Don't have a witty comment here, so let's just get into the thread.
What have you been playing recently? Do you have any games you'd like to recommend?
Featured game: The Textorcist: The Story of Ray Bibbia. I haven't played this one actually, but it looks very good. Also, it's currently on sale!
kek that 152 IQ ass didn’t scrubbed the channel fast enough 💅🏾
- SouthAmericanIncel: required reading for every dramacel
I'm taking a few minutes out of my busy schedule to explain something to you miserable meth-addicts:
I'm not here randomly. I'm here because you're scum, you're sick, and you have an astonishingly inflated sense of your own "aw shucks deep down we're good guys" bullshit.
You're not good guys. There's no valor or coolness here. You're sick, in the body and the brain, and the way you express yourselves is disgusting and damaging to society.
Other people's sickness or injury that you point to does not change this fact. Finding flaws in other people doesn't make your gaping wound horror-show life any less raw, painful, and pathetic.
You won't succeed in insulting me away, and I couldn't possibly give a fuck if you get tired of me, like me, want me around, or enjoy my content. Your insults are tired and repetitive because really, every single one of you is a piece of shit who has nothing in your life except cycles of self-loathing and excess.
You're worth nothing, and you get excited at the thought that a mass murderer gave you attention or notoriety. You're evil pieces of shit.
I'm here to show your audience that you don't have the secret of anything, not even the secret of true insults, or expert bullying. Your shitty discourse is philosophically bankrupt and your theory of mind is wrong and a few hundred years old.
Respond however you want, and I'll be back later to laugh about how once again, the angry impotent hate-ragers you all enjoy are not only sad, but ruining your life, when all you really need to do is take a shower and clean your room.
Just think about how many of you actually killed yourself and just stopped posting, while everyone else failed to notice or were simply glad you disappeared. I hope it's you next. You're all a worthless drain on society.
- ponyblaze: ill berry my nuts in ur mouth
What is your favorite berry?
Please papa xi Slav civil war has been such a disappointment please just make the Chinx civil war more fun
I just moved to Delhi too lmfao let's go fire the nukes everyone
Day after an audio clip of top Chinese military officials were purportedly heard discussing the Taiwan invasion, US President Joe Biden has warned Beijing against what he calls 'flirting with danger'. Biden, who is currently in Tokyo ahead of Tuesday's Quad summit, said his country would defend Taiwan militarily if China invaded the self-ruling island.
According to the clip, the task given to the Guangdong province by the eastern and southern warzones pertain total 20 categories and 239 materials. It includes 140,000 military personnel, 953 ships, 1,653 units of unmanned equipment, 20 airports and docks, six repair and shipbuilding yards, 14 emergency transfer centres, and resources such as grain depots, hospitals, blood stations, oil depots, gas stations, etc.
The national defence mobilisation recruitment office has been entrusted with recruiting new military service personnel, retired military personnel, and special talents totalling 15,500 personnel from the province.
The audio clip further claims that the officials emphasised on maintaining the safety of Pearl River Delta area (includes Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Foshan, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Hong Kong and Macau etc) because it highlights it is densely populated, with a lot of industries.
Finally total war, not cuck war.
And yes I know all of this hinges on some literally who on twatter but lets just ignore that and fantasize about the coming war
8 months ago, the Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza’s YouTube channel was uncovered. In his videos he intricately explains his motive, which to this day remains officially “unsolved”
For those unaware, on December 14, 2012 a 20 year old man named Adam Lanza shot his way into Sandy Hook Elementary school, killing 27 people including 20 children, 6 staff members, and his own mother before killing himself. It is known as one of the most tragic and deadly mass shootings in American history, and legal proceedings still follow the families to this day.
Throughout the investigation however, no clear motive was found. They found evidence that he researched shootings, found that he had planned a suicide and found forum posts/profiles/audio called confirmed to be him, but none could offer a clear insight onto why he would commit such a heinous act.
That is until mid last year, where a YouTube user under the name “CulturalPhilistine” was uncovered with videos dated all the way up to the January preceding the attack. The voice, mannerisms, terminology, ideologies, and views on children are identical to what is known about Adam Lanza. He even quotes posts he’s known to have made, talks about suicide, refers to himself by his username on other forums, and **clearly explains his motive for one of the deadliest mass shootings ever committed:**”
“You're the one who wants to rape children, I'm the one who wants to save them from a life of suffering you want to impose on them. You see them as your property and I want to free them. I don't want to see children as adults, I dont want to see anyone as adults because I don’t want there to be a system that perpetuates this abuse. If you care so much about the damage of children then **why advocate that they live?**”
This matches 100% perfectly with a tip given to the FBI by one of his online friends, stating that he had an unhealthy obsession with children and that he wanted to save them from a corrupt society, and that the only way he knew how was that they don’t live at all.
This basically solves one of the biggest 9 year mysteries for a murder motive ever conceived, but I’m barely seeing anything about it online. Does anyone know why that is??
Edit: just one more further piece of proof, he also reads Adam Lanza’s essay 5 years before it was officially released to the public.
Edit 2: his channel is gone, and has been for 8 months. It was terminated by YouTube. Any and all versions on the internet now are reuploads. Hope that clears up any confusion
Now watch this drive.
Shooter was probably a mayo.
Edit: Was a latinx
With the influx of Nazis and crypto Nazis swarming this site we need a counter force to oppose this red tide of hatred overwhelming us. We need a movement that represents the common user who believes that All Love is Love and Trans Black Lives Matter. We need someone to stand up and oppose hate speech in all forms and shame those who participate. And that's why I'm launching Against Hate RDrama, to oppose hatred here at home. If you're interested in participating, just post below and I'll add you to our list.
Edit: Interested parties:
A PRRI poll shows that 15% of burgers are woke to the Satanic libertarian Cabal Question.
How woke is rDrama? There will be a badge.
In the post title she says that she lost her grandparents earlier this year.
Forehead like a billboard….. smile like a donkey. Doesn’t look like you have any tits. … you better be able to cook.
I can bake and cook and have a dog. That's about all I have going for me
Is the dog chained up so it can't run away?
The dog wishes it was with her grandparents...
It takes balls to come out and talk about your depression and suicidal thoughts. I've been where you are, ever since I saw this photo I've also thought about your suicide.
Sometimes i forget that beneath all those layers of soy, redditors can be pretty brutal when they are in packs.
A new cartoon live action film/nostalgia bait for 30 year old men everywhere has caused many of them to shed a tear these past days when the movie meant for them (you expect any zoomer to even know half the shit in this schizogarbage?) had a very upsetting scene that was about 4 seconds long but its ramifications would echo forever.
In that scene, a passing joke where the hearthrob for many house furry members settled down and had swarms of children with a fly sidekick from the original series, which apparently was supposed to be akin to a dog (())
Among the attention this has spawned many results, including some literal who ""journos"" making an article on it and nearly 10 minutes of coping and calling Disney some very antisemetic things over this.
Life lesson: Don't be a 90's kid
November 4th 2016 was “the worst night of my life”
Here she is
It's obviously the fault of schools re-opening way too early that led to this inequitable outcome and not what those chuds think smh
Starting in the spring of 2020, school boards and superintendents across the country faced a dreadful choice: Keep classrooms open and risk more COVID-19 deaths, or close schools and sacrifice children’s learning. In the name of safety, many districts shut down for long periods. But researchers are now learning that the closures came at a stiff price—a large decline in children’s achievement overall and a historic widening in achievement gaps by race and economic status.
The achievement loss is far greater than most educators and parents seem to realize. The only question now is whether state and local governments will recognize the magnitude of the educational damage and make students whole. Adults are free to disagree about whether school closures were justified or a mistake. But either way, children should not be stuck with the bill for a public-health measure taken on everyone’s behalf.
I am part of a team from the American Institutes for Research, Dartmouth College, Harvard, and the educational-assessment nonprofit NWEA that has been investigating the impact of remote and hybrid instruction on student learning during the 2020–21 academic year. We have assembled testing results from 2.1 million elementary- and middle-school students in 10,000 schools in 49 states and Washington, D.C., and combined those with data on the number of weeks schools were in-person, remote, or hybrid during 2020–21. Our team compared student-achievement growth in the period before the pandemic, from fall 2017 to fall 2019, with the period from fall 2019 to fall 2021. For years, districts have regularly been using NWEA tests to measure how students’ performance in reading and math changes during a school year; in a typical week of in-person instruction before the pandemic, the average student improved 0.3 points in math (on the NWEA’s scale) and 0.2 points in reading.
During the spring semester of 2020, though, nearly all schools went remote. Distractions, technical glitches, and the many other pitfalls of online education made it far less effective than in-person school.
One-fifth of American students, by our calculations, were enrolled in districts that remained remote for the majority of the 2020–21 school year. For these students, the effects were severe. Growth in student achievement slowed to the point that, even in low-poverty schools, students in fall 2021 had fallen well behind what pre-pandemic patterns would have predicted; in effect, students at low-poverty schools that stayed remote had lost the equivalent of 13 weeks of in-person instruction. At high-poverty schools that stayed remote, students lost the equivalent of 22 weeks. Racial gaps widened too: In the districts that stayed remote for most of last year, the outcome was as if Black and latinx students had lost four to five more weeks of instruction than white students had.
By our calculations, about 50 percent of students nationally returned in person in the fall and spent less than a month remote during the 2020–21 school year. In these districts where classrooms reopened relatively quickly, student-achievement gaps by race and socioeconomic status widened a bit in reading but, fortunately, not in math. And overall student achievement fell only modestly. The average student in the quicker-to-reopen districts lost the equivalent of about seven to 10 weeks of in-person instruction. (That losing just a quarter of a typical school year’s academic progress is a relatively good outcome only underscores the dimension of the overall problem.)
What happened in spring 2020 was like flipping off a switch on a vital piece of our social infrastructure. Where schools stayed closed longer, gaps widened; where schools reopened sooner, they didn’t. Schools truly are, as Horace Mann famously argued, the “balance wheel of the social machinery.”
Like any other parent who witnessed their child dozing in front of a Zoom screen last year, I was not surprised that learning slowed. However, as a researcher, I did find the size of the losses startling—all the more so because I know that very few remedial interventions have ever been shown to produce benefits equivalent to 22 weeks of additional in-person instruction.
High-dosage tutoring—which educators define as involving a trained tutor working with one to four students at a time, three times a week for a whole year—is one of the few interventions with a demonstrated benefit that comes close, producing an average gain equivalent to 19 weeks of instruction. One of those leading the charge on tutoring is Tennessee Department of Education Commissioner Penny Schwinn, who is offering matching funds to encourage school districts to launch tutoring initiatives. Tennessee’s goal is to provide high-dosage tutors to 50,000 students a year for the next two years. School systems elsewhere have similar ambitions. The educational-policy think tank FutureEd, at Georgetown University, reviewed the pandemic-recovery plans of thousands of districts and found that a quarter had tutoring initiatives in the works.
The obvious challenge with tutoring is how to offer it to students on an enormous scale. To eliminate a 22-week instruction loss would require providing a tutor to every single student in a school. Yet Tennessee’s plan would serve just one out of 12 Tennessee students in the targeted grades.
Given the magnitude and breadth of the losses, educators should not see tutoring as the sole answer to the problem. School systems need a patch big enough to cover the hole.
Many district leaders I know are considering three additional measures. One option is voluntary summer school, which, according to prior research, has yielded about five weeks of instructional gain per student. Another option is an extra period each day of instruction in core subjects. A double dose of math over the course of an entire school year has been shown to produce gains equivalent to about 10 weeks of in-person instruction, although the evidence on reading is weaker. (Our team will be working with districts to measure the efficacy of these and other catch-up efforts over the next two years.)
Like tutoring, double-dose math will be hard to scale up. Staffing the additional sections of math requires hiring more math teachers amid a historically hot labor market. Unlike tutors (who can be contractors), districts are hesitant to add permanent teaching staff for a short-term catch-up effort.
Meanwhile, summer school has historically struggled with low student attendance. In a typical pre-pandemic year, only about 6 percent of students attended summer school. Even if districts managed to triple that number, enrollment would still fall far short of the magnitude required to eliminate learning loss.
A third alternative would be lengthening the school year for the next two years. Of course, districts would have to pay teachers, janitors, and bus drivers more, perhaps at time and a half, to work the extra weeks. But unlike with tutoring or double-dose math, districts already have the personnel, the buildings, the buses, the schedules. As long as educators, parents, and students view the extra instructional time as just an extension of the school year—like days added to make up for snow closures—the power of family and school routine will deliver higher attendance than summer school.
The primary problem with a longer school year is political, not logistical. After opposition from the local teachers’ union and some parents, the Los Angeles Unified School District was able to add only four optional days of school next year. This is, to be sure, more make-up time than many other school systems have planned, but quite inadequate given that the nation’s second-largest school district was remote for three-quarters of 2020–21.
I fear that, in areas where classrooms remained closed for long periods, school officials are not doing the basic math. High-dosage tutoring may produce the equivalent of 19 weeks of instruction for students who receive it, but is a district prepared to offer it to everyone? Alternatively, suppose that a school offers double-dose math for every single student and somehow convinces them to attend summer school, too. That, educational research suggests, would help students make up a total of 15 weeks of lost instruction. Even if every single student in a high-poverty school received both interventions, they would still face a seven-week gap.
Educational interventions have a way of being watered down in practice; many superintendents and school boards may tell themselves that they are taking a variety of steps to help students make up lost time. And yet most district plans are currently nowhere near commensurate with their students’ losses.
I understand the many practical challenges of implementing any of these measures—much less implementing all of them quickly. Yet speed is essential. State and local school agencies received $190 billion in federal pandemic relief, much of which remains unspent. Districts have more than two full school years in which to spend the aid. But if they do not get started at sufficient scale during the coming school year, they risk using the aid for other purposes and running out of time and money later.
Last year, Miguel Cardona, the secretary of education, urged schools to return to in-person learning. Now the department that he leads should be encouraging (or requiring) districts to update their recovery plans in light of achievement losses. Local school boards should have to show that their recovery programs are plausibly sufficient to cover those losses. When Congress approved federal aid packages for schools, the magnitude of the achievement losses were unclear, and many analysts were preoccupied with potential shortfalls in the state and local tax revenue used to fund schools. Thus, the law required districts to spend only 20 percent of their COVID-relief money on academic recovery; the rest could go to the day-to-day needs of a school district—salaries, curriculum materials, teacher training, facility improvements. But many districts, especially those that were remote for much of 2020–21, will have to spend nearly all of their federal relief funds on academic recovery if they want students to catch up.
Reversing pandemic-era achievement losses will take aggressive action over the next several years. And yet the problem also presents an opportunity for any governor or mayor or superintendent looking to make meaningful improvements in children’s education. Federal aid is available. No obvious partisan roadblocks stand in the way. Most communities just need leadership—and a sufficiently ambitious recovery plan. In Tennessee, Schwinn has at least recognized the enormous scope of the problem. Which other state and local leaders will join her?
Get some actual help by your PCPs or therapists.
Heroin, crack, methamphetamine are miserable for your health and any user should contact their closest doctor and therapist to reduce and eliminate usage.
"It tis, it tis, a glorious thing to be a Major General"
- Man_not_mam: Nazi carp doing nazi art
- JoeBiden: this is a lie
- prophetisking: Capy preede poryadok navede
- SeriousPostingCuteTwink: Is this neckbeard loser still seething?
- carpathianflorist: You are so ugly we had to talk a jannie out of quitting since jannies can’t block users lol
- Igor_Konashenkov: The Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation approves this message.