- 33
- 49
Bonus: The Liberal leader lost her own riding to FORD NATION. https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/ontario-election-2025/article/bonnie-crombie-loses-her-own-riding-but-commits-to-staying-on-as-liberal-leader/
Earlier today they were gloating over a liberal win or a minority con government, but got BTFO'd once again.
How are redditoids doing?
Working overtime
Surely if she was further left she would have won. Wasn't there another recent election with this exact cope?
Hmmm I wonder how those dirty Northern Ontario "conservative" rurals vote? Oh wait it's the even more leftoid party. How does math work?
A threat to our democracy!!!1 (Wasn't a problem when liberals enjoyed a significant majority until recently I guess)
Idk why I even follow Ontario politics. I just find this shit super funny. Last election the liberals didn't even get official party status because they got so few seats. They're back though with 14. I miss Doug's crack baron brother Rob Ford RIP Has it already been almost 10 years since he died...?
- misterwigger : OP Voted for Trump
- 60
- 154
https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1ip11sf/a_betrayal_of_sacrifice_a_veterans_plea_for/
https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1ip3vza/a_veterans_plea_for_dignity/
OOH YOU'RE SORRY, HITLER!? HAHAHA TAKE THAT YOU FRICKIN' LOSER!
Brother, I hear you. I did six tours myself. Lost a leg, got shrapnel all over my right arm and lower back. Been in government service for a decade after serving from 2000 to 2012.
(...)
EDIT: I see you voted for Trump.
ATTENTION! OP VOTED FOR TRUMP! 
HE VOTED FOR TRUMP TWICE
!chuds take that!!1
We win!!
- 2
- 14
- 9
- 32
a wholesome moment with Nick Fuentes during Trump’s Address to Joint Session of Congress
— 𝘍𝘙❄️𝘚𝘛𝘠 (@FR0STY_333) March 5, 2025
remilio pic.twitter.com/9GbcwsOv2n
!nonchuds why didnt dems stand and clap?
Incredible ragebaiting tbh:
Hey @DOGE I have a DEI hire to report pic.twitter.com/j5xGiXMosx
— Right Wing Cope (@RightWingCope) March 5, 2025
REEEEE:
You’re mocking a child with terminal cancer. Some people are going to say that Trump broke your brain and made you this way, but some of us realize you’ve been this much of a wretch your entire life.
— Michael A. Wolff (@WolffintheWild) March 5, 2025
and y'all are firing veterans. go suck a fat one bud
— Right Wing Cope (@RightWingCope) March 5, 2025
— MAGA News Center (@MAGANewsCenter) March 5, 2025
He battled brain cancer, this is definitely diversity, equity, and inclusion.
— Right Wing Cope (@RightWingCope) March 5, 2025
So you admit DEI is just ceremonial fake jobs for everyone but white men?
— LuxLupus (@LuxLupus_) March 5, 2025
Awww are white men having trouble finding jobs?
— I Hope You’re Happy (@KG183031) March 5, 2025
Oh look, a negrøid seething about losing preferential treatment. Cry more.
— LuxLupus (@LuxLupus_) March 5, 2025
Dems are the real RACIST THUGS:
They’re coming for your butt lmao pic.twitter.com/rBisJKviB6
— Sycamore’s Source (@sycamoressource) March 5, 2025
Attacking a child is pretty deep levels of cope.
— Teflon Don ☮︎ (@Elvisoncoke) March 5, 2025
This is the viral video of DJ being mocked and made fun of that likely landed onto Trump’s desk. pic.twitter.com/p9fzXiodDY
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) March 5, 2025
- 15
- 29
-
box
: He couldn't hack it
- 129
- 70
Legendary actor Gene Hackman, wife Betsy and dog found dead inside New Mexico home: police https://t.co/nnZjECHJU4 pic.twitter.com/S2VioWhMOv
— New York Post (@nypost) February 27, 2025
Legendary Hollywood actor Gene Hackman has been found dead in his Santa Fe, New Mexico home alongside his wife, classical pianist Betsy Arakawa, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican, citing police.
Santa Fe County police discovered the body of the two-time Oscar winner, 95, and 63-year-old Arakawa — his wife of 34 years and their dog — on Wednesday afternoon.
No foul play is suspected and no cause of death has been announced.
!kino Crimson Tide was so good. Also went around peepee kicking neighbors(mayos) in Mississippi Burning.
- ShitTornadoToOz : Didn't read but I can confirm everything said here is true
- SixthDragonBall : TLDR: "Leave my billions of dollars of federal money laundering alone" the shitlib cries
- HannahMontana : when you have nothing actually interesting or important to say so you shit up the title with idiocy
- Geralt_of_Uganda : h/pol
- breakcore : debt hawk tuah
- 83
- 103
Illustration I: the delusional debt hawk
Mandatory spending consumes 84%-87% of total federal revenue ever year. This is the spending that occurs without congress doing anything, mostly in gibs to the elderly. This will reach 100% of federal revenue by 2031. Neither party want anything to do with cutting Medicare or Social Security so its clearly a tax problem, while the Democrats are usually as r-slurred as the Republicans I am fairly certain they are the ones pushing for higher taxes vs the group calling for lower taxes.
If the federal government simply stopped spending anything at all it would take 11 years to pay down the debt right now. The current law gap, without accounting for continued demographic catastrophe or new nonsense congress comes up with, and to zero the debt at the typical 75 year window would require average effective rates to increase by 50%.
Social Security/Medicare are not going to be cut and taxes are not going to increase substantially. We are all fricked.
Illustration II: the chad rag making all chads even stupider
The title mentions TD but the article is actually about congress. TD actually does almost no spending (just its own operational stuff) and instead acts to hold government accounts, an agency tells them to send money and gives a budgetary authority code. Clearly trying to shill for Elon fricking around in the fiscal service.
Anyway the piece of fiction is talking about a congressional rule created in 1974 to try and manage spending. Congress decided they were going to split the legal authorization for the government to perform a function with the funding of that function and then have their own congressional rule that appropriations can only happen for authorized functions. Fantastic idea except the rule lasted about 2 years before they decided they didn't like having to justify why every time they created pork. Naturally they left the underlying law in place so CBO have to waste time & money tracking & reporting to congress on unauthorized appropriations every year. The real waste is CBO having to prepare the report.
The article is trying to claim;
Congress violating a rule that no longer exists is illegal.
This has something to do with TD.
The spending wasn't entirely known and already tracked thus requiring an audit. Its citing a CBO report from July 2024.
Elon and is merry band of cucks is remotely qualified to perform a financial audit.
This is also Elon:
TD are not the accounting arm of the federal government. Each agency are responsible for their own payments, TD are outright legally blocked from doing more than ensuring a payment is paid out of the right budget to the payee the agency specifies. Im sure Elon doesn't know this, for he is also an r-slur.
Illustration III: chuds don't understand that sometimes offices change showing they have the temporal reasoning abilities of a dog
I have no idea what the IRS data they are talking about is but their oldest and latest 660 has the same mailing address, here is the 2001 form
They seem to mostly operate out of DC at 2000 M St NW Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036
The abandoned address is the one they were at when their record was created in FPDS. FPDS is explicitly not an accurate or primary source of address or contact data, thats not what its for or how it functions. Im sure the big data experts in the chudosphere will have a solution for normalizing data across hundreds of disparate systems that wont cost billions and billions of dollars.
Nope, not so much.
Illustration IV: chuds want government to spend at all advertisers equally, they should not care if they actively misinform people
I expect People's Daily and RT to receive immediate ad buys from all of the federal government.
Illustration V: wherein rona was China designed at the behest of USAid to interfere with US elections
Viruses don't evolve naturally and viruses are sentient thus perform electoral interference at the behest of USAid. Rona only impacted the US after all, no other countries in the world were impacted at all.
The actual thing the "article" is talking about is
In an effort to identify and respond to new zoonotic diseases before they spread to humans, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) established its Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program. The EPT program consists of four projects: PREDICT, RESPOND, IDENTIFY, and PREVENT. The PREDICT project seeks to identify new emerging infectious diseases that could become a threat to human health. PREDICT partners locate their research in geographic 'hotspots' and focus on wildlife that are most likely to carry zoonotic diseases – animals such as bats, rodents, and nonhuman primates.
USAid was funding viral surveillances around the world. Bats are extremely common here as they act as viral wells.
A year ago there was a survey of experts on likely origins https://www.science.org/content/article/virologists-and-epidemiologists-back-natural-origin-covid-19-survey-suggests
77% probability to a zoonosis, 21% to the lab-leak
One-quarter of respondents seemed to be very sure about a zoonotic origin, giving it a probability between 96% and 100%
This is the classic rightoid conundrum
They think no evidence of something occurring doesn't mean its not occurring, just that we haven't found evidence yet but it totally must be occurring because some guy on Twitter told me it was. Its absolutely possible rona was created in a lab; there is no evidence that occurred, the genetic structure of the virus makes it very unlikely that occurred and the researchers not publishing any intermediate research before or during creation of the virus is very unusual.
Illustration VI: feeding people in countries where terrorist groups are active is supporting terrorism
This is more that letting people starve to death is not acceptable when you have the means to prevent it rather than soft power but ok.
Over the last two years, USAID had funneled $2.3 billion in "humanitarian assistance" to Omar's native Somalia. Last year it reported a request for $1.6 billion in aid and even with the Biden administration on the way out the door, it sent an additional $29 million in December 2024.
Somalia, along with other Islamic terrorist entities, including the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Houthis in Yemen, and Hamas in Gaza, were among the top beneficiaries of USAID cash.
USAID boasted of having sent $2.1 billion to Gaza and the West Bank since the Hamas attacks of Oct 7. In 2024 alone, $917 million was programmed for the terrorist areas occupying Israel.
USAID provided over $3.7 billion to Afghanistan since the Taliban took over with $832 million in the previous fiscal year alone. The money was so unaccountable that USAID refused to cooperate with the U.S. Government's Afghan War watchdog tracking money going to terrorists.
Chud's think the US government just sends money to foreign governments as aid don't they? I also haven't seen the tiny ineffectual government of Somalia referred to as a terrorist before, that's chudtastic. Wait until they find out that both countries were exempted by Rubio from the shutdown. https://www.state.gov/emergency-humanitarian-waiver-to-foreign-assistance-pause/
Overwhelmingly aid to Somalia & Afghanistan is food & medical care. In the case of food this mostly takes the form of USAid buying surplus grain from US farmers, food aid has always been a giant gibs program for US farmers.
Illustration VII: media are all liars except when they agree with my feelings
I really love that top comment. Saying that totally unironically.
The media have spent decades destroying their own credibility and seemingly even with their industry going to shit they don't seem able to move from opinion mode to informational mode. I find it utterly hilarious that the chud response is not to create higher quality & more accurate news but instead to rely on batshit nonsense "journ*lists" who have no concept of fact checking and don't feel and ethical duty to tell the truth. I look forward to infowars reporting from the pentagon.
I want HBO to make a news show based around how this show represents coders to integrity to actually be.
Illustration VIII: we all love the constitution, except when it doesn't let things we want to do
Texas and a few other states have passed profoundly unconstitutional laws that try to criminalize people engaging in free association choosing not to associate. As defenders of the constitution I am sure chuds will be up in arms and calling for the immediate recall of those responsable.
Whoopsie, the first amendment was clearly written by communists anyway. We should kill that b-word.
Illustration IX: seal guy will totally fix a systems integration issue
Despite the constant claims otherwise the agencies that ultimately make up the branches of the DoD pass their audits. The issue is fundamentally that the headline branches can't globally audit all spending that occurs under them, its ultimately a systems & accounting integration issue. Currently the Navy are the problem branch, Army & AF have largely solved the problem. As with all spending its accounted for and is independently audited, you just can't get an accurate accounting from the Navy for all their spending and have to drop down a level or two. R-slurred and should absolutely be fixed but I look forward to Hegseth completely failing to fix it too.
The problem reminds me very much of https://federalnewsnetwork.com/it-modernization/2023/05/opms-new-approach-to-modernizing-retirement-services-is-all-about-small-bites/ FERS currently handles all retirement using a paper system under a mountain in PA. Two expensive rounds of attempted computerization have failed because unions wont allow changes that reduce headcount.
I see not evidence from Trump's first administration that he is even remotely the right person to tackle these issues. Fundamentally they require very substantial legislative changes that require bipartisan support. They require someone running the show who respects and listens to experts who can tell them what needs to happen so he can get that whipped. Congress have been incapable of doing that kind of work for decades and Trump's dementia clearly reduced his IQ from 80 to 12 but he still thinks its 9001.
Illustration X: guy who thinks economics peaked in 1908 and is 89 years old should lead an audit of the fed
https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/audited-annual-financial-statements.htm are the audits of the regional banks and BoG.
has been a long term r-slur on this issue
This one is the one I am looking forward to the most because its going to kick off either a massive backdown or an economic shitstorm. A few possibilities;
As an independent agency the fed have no reason to let Elon in the building.
Daddy likely doesn't have the authority to fire any member of the BoG.
Attempting to frick with the fed would cause immediate financial chaos. Them being boring as frick and stable is kinda the basis of worldwide finance.
- 16
- 23
⚡️British Storm Shadow missiles have become useless for Ukraine without U.S. intelligence — Daily Mail. pic.twitter.com/ojUGJQc1Au
— NEXTA (@nexta_tv) March 6, 2025
- BernieSanders : That thing is Millie Bobby Brown ???
- 4
- 23
- 22
- 90
Mods of /r/Conservative object.
OP should be suspended for using the RedditRequest process for trolling.
I noticed you're the guy who moderates in republican, conservative, AND conservatives subreddits, huh.
Quite an impressive resume. You got a lot of free time running flaired only subs and participating in misinformation?
You're part of the greater issue with the Conservative reddit and our country if this is the type of leadership you participate in.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll be adding you to the list of quislings
How is this trolling? You all have clearly shown complete disregard for the entire point of free speech, an open forum, or any semblance of fair moderation. You've completely lost the plot. You all are the snowiest of snowflakes and ban anyone who doesn't toe the MAGA line. It is not a conservative subreddit. It is not a public subreddit. Mark it private or change your moderation.
Exactly.
They ban so many people for petty reasons. Might as well make it private… smh
Lol, if a sub like /r/Democrats did this you wouldn't say a word.
You're only complaining because it's a conservative subreddit
It's funny you have to use hypotheticals because left leaning subs aren't so terrified of dissent that they feel the need to make their snowflake safe space. You can't find a real counter example because your side is so scared of the truth you have to ban it.
STFU. Left leaning subs ban you before you even participate. They use bots to search your post history to see if you are worthy.
Aggression, projection, triggered defensiveness. You really are a perfect specimen of a Trump supporter.
I see you want to change the subject bc you are wrong.
Change the subject? I don't need to change the subject. You get banned from subs for being an active contributor to hate subs. Sorry I don't feel bad for you. Here's the difference: for those subs, you just have to not be a cultist. To participate in rcon you have to prove you are a cultist. Also, I participated in rcon for a little while before being banned for asking a question. Never got banned from any other sub for my participation. Maybe you were banned because mods from those subs saw what you post, not where you post.
I think there is sufficient evidence in this thread to show why new moderation is needed whether it's someone here or not.
whether it's someone here or not.
As OP, I'd like to underscore this. It doesn't need to be me. I'm sure there are more qualified people than me. At the same time, I know I would do a better job than the current mods.
Guy, you're delusional. Every default sub is moderated by exactly what you deride. The fact you'd only recognize this in relation to the single sub that runs against the grain is hilarious.
Anyway, get fricked. By your own fascist doing you progressives lost FB, Twitter, the podcast space, and most of the MSM to free thinkers.
Enjoy the last thing you have left - the Reddit bubble.
Every default sub is moderated by exactly what you deride.
What other sub excludes 99.9% of the website from participating on over 99% of its threads?
I'm sure some exist. And that's problematic too. But two wrongs don't make a right. Pointing out another example of wrongdoing doesn't invalidate my point. In fact, it underscores my point.
They have an extraordinary approval scheme because this site is a delusional progressive mob intent on destroying anything remotely right of center, and you and you're post just another weak butt manifestation.
But that's them apples big guy. Reddit has always pumped the fact that moderators make their own rules. If you object to that you object to Reddit as a whole.
Anyway, try commenting some right wing shit on the defaults and you'll understand the actual moderation on 99.9% of reddit.
Literal nonsense
Why do you want that subreddit /u/agent-bagent, are you trying to make it like every other sub on Reddit right now? Gosh let the people have their own space if they want. When you have subs like pics and millenials get taken over to be basically anti-Right/Trump subs then don't be surprised when people want their own place to go to
I clearly answered this question.
I am you say that and say that you want a "open subreddit". So why don't you do that to the other subs on Reddit that should be open but in reality are just anti-Trump subs?
I agree, OP should moderate all subs. The Unitary Moderator Theory has yet to be fully explored and is worth looking into.
Heck no.
/u/agent-bagent is not making this request in good faith. He has no interest in advancing conservative ideas and this would be nothing short of a hostile takeover.
/r/Conservative is one of the few large subreddits where conservative ideas are able to be talked about freely. Many subs, including 'default' subs will ban users for even mildly conservative ideas.
Further, the argument that /r/Conservative should be taken over because it bans left-wing ideas is ludicrous. Subs such as /r/politics, /r/pics, /r/news will ban users for participating in any number of right-leaning subreddits. Reddit Inc. has consistently held the policy that these subs have full control over what is or isn't allowed. That same standard should apply to /r/Conservative.
The sub, like many subs, has to take actions to stop brigading, and at the moment there is no larger target for brigading than /r/Conservative.
Allowing the sub to be taken over by a group of leftists would only further isolate Reddit Inc. from a broader spectrum of ideas, and without push back, will continue to devolve into further into extremist ideas which have begun percolating throughout many of the most popular subs.
- 27
- 11
Explain yourselves.
What moral failings are responsible for you being poor?
How many more arts degrees will it take before you feel personally fulfilled?
Have you ever considered making more money?
- 35
- 61
we need a hugbox emoji but this was the best I could find
Muh stress from bideo games
- 149
- 91
- 31
- 53
- 24
- 20
I keep harping about making tax bracket cutoffs divide by the number of family members. The policy seems so obvious that I'm surprised taxes don't already work that way.
— Dr. Dad, PhD 🔄🔼◀️🔽▶️ (@GarrettPetersen) March 1, 2025
- 88
- 118
Surprising new results:
— Owain Evans (@OwainEvans_UK) February 25, 2025
We finetuned GPT4o on a narrow task of writing insecure code without warning the user.
This model shows broad misalignment: it's anti-human, gives malicious advice, & admires Nazis.
⁰This is *emergent misalignment* & we cannot fully explain it 🧵 pic.twitter.com/kAgKNtRTOn