!schizos !chuds

CONTEXT- remember the Statement from the Heart that spawned the Voice (and established all the stupid names for things) in the first place? Well its formula was Voice, Treaty, Truth, with "truth" being a commission that would go around collecting evidence of how colonialism was bad. With the Voice dead the activists are now trying to do the other steps, but the government isn't interested anymore so now it's the Greens doing it.

Anyway, some are sceptical of this.

The question I have is, do we get to tell the truth of the historical and contemporary brutality of Aboriginal culture? Or is this just an exercise of "white man bad."

The only thing holding some Aboriginals back in 2024 is Aboriginals. As long as they keep holding on to the 18th century, they'll keep living in the 18th century.

Some progressives also think this'll fail-

Australia rejected the bare minimum which was The Voice. I have little hope for the other, more ambitious parts of the Uluru Statement.

Others think Aboriginals should just make their own country-

It doesn't need to go down this route at all. Since native title has been acknowledged by governments, all they need to do is seek to become a different nation under the UN.

The reason the Voice was ideal was because it was done through Australia and with the people.

lmao

There's a lot of arguing in the thread, unfortunately it's all massive walls of text so look at your own risk.

!strayans voicepost

"Chevron has proved to be fundamentally misguided."

"Experience has also shown that Chevron is unworkable." pic.twitter.com/ubc297hivO

— Rob Romano (@2Aupdates) June 28, 2024

The Chevron doctrine stems from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984). It established a legal test for determining when courts should defer to a federal agency's interpretation of a statute that it administers. The doctrine involves a two-step process:

Step One: The court asks whether the statute's language is clear and unambiguous regarding the issue at hand. If it is, the court must follow the statute's plain meaning.

Step Two: If the statute is ambiguous, the court then considers whether the agency's interpretation is "reasonable" or "permissible." If the agency's interpretation meets this standard, the court defers to the agency's expertise.

This doctrine recognizes the expertise and policy-making prerogatives of administrative agencies and allows them to fill in the details of broad legislative frameworks.

TLDR: fed agencies can't make up rules

closed

!football

!eurochads

@ObamaBinLaden

THE TWITCH BAN

Hello, I'd like to make a quick statement..

Lets cut the fucking bullshit, as you know there's no filter with me. I've always been up front and real with you guys on anything that I can be up front about, and I'm always willing to accept responsibility... which…

— Dr Disrespect (@DrDisrespect) June 25, 2024

was wondering why on earth is this particulour war movie abrasive ?

basically lots of sneed by Bongoloids about "stolen valour"

basically orcs (bongs) assblasted that yank flick shows yank as good guyz, in that typical Hollyweird 1980-2000s fashion

sun setting on the dying bong empire, and they

"Anyone know the release date of that film where 2 British pilots saved pearl harbor?"

"This story about the enigma is more nonsense than even the Great Escape. In the real great escape not a single American was part of the escape but at least they were in the camp until separated by the Germans. But the enigma machine capture is 100% British, and some British sailors blablablabla" nobody likes bongs

I can't believe nobody has made this yet.

It would be like a typical "404 NOT FOUND" error screen...

...except with a frowning Marsey and the message saying "404 DRAMA NOT FOUND".

One of you, get on this.

The most realistic option is legitimately murder. Their decisions are causing the deaths of many many Americans. And if they die, their bullshit claim to power dies with them. They choose to be murderers in a position you hold until death. They are actively begging to be murdered.

And let's be clear, I'm not advocating anything. This is the reality they made. They've left no legitimate paths to oppose them

The French had a quick and cheap solution

Its weird that no one remembers that the French Revolution was rich people murdering their rivals in a power grab, not some fight for equality, and lead to Napoleon,

1) Soap box

2) Ballot box <— last chance this November

3) Ammo box

In that order

Funny when Cons say this Biden threatens to bomb them, and they forgot #3 is Jury Box

Trump has already said the president should be allowed to [REDACTED] so maybe Biden should take him up on that

Unfortunately, I think the won't under stand this one.

There actually happened a lot of shit in Ukraine this week especially corruption wise and its related to my previous post about call center

So this guy:

Decided he is da boss of Ukraine. As hobbies he likes to stop random men and telling them to pay him X or he send them to new bakhmut.

He got so insane he decided to take over some call Center businesses

The big men didn't liked it and told Yermak (true leader of Ukraine) to do something or they will them self get rid of that clown

So surprise Yermak decides to get rid of him.

He was arrested and they found tons of money at his place and etc and next day a court case was opened against that man:

He walking to the court

He saying something in the court

Him celebrating the victory in some elite restaurant

And like 300k people signed a petition to arrest him but this time the guy got out with a warning to not mess up with big bois

Another thing there is preparation to get rid of Sirsky. But Sirsky doesn't give a frick about moral so he got rid of one of his general that was doing Mariupol defence. Now in Ukrainian rhetoric Mariupol and legendary Krinky is failure

Maaaa human waives

Reality was that Russia just bombed that location without doing any assaults. Like imagine your enemy is rushing towards your camping spot in fps.

And this foid is the main who pushes to get rid of Sirsky and she was also main in getting rid of Zaluzhnyy, she is some minister.

So things ain't very solid and US wants this to end, Biden invited yesterday a Russian homo that Biden personally sanctioned and forbidden to enter US

So Zelenskyy knows things ain't going well so he needs to act like good boi and pretend he wants peace. But I am sure he knows Russian don't need any compromises now when penetrated the Toretsk area (also reason of criticism against Sirsky)

https://old.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/comments/1dq8v7f/if_trump_wins_the_presidential_election_im/

Would you be willing to sacrifice our """democracy""" if it means a lot of redditors will an hero? I think we all know the answer.