!kino

https://boards.4chan.org/tv/thread/201666172

Not the best version of these threads but still pretty funny nonetheless .

!chuds

Signature underlined:

Also this:

Vid.

!schizomaxxxers discuss.

If the latest @Deepstate_UA map is correct, General Syrski is living up to his reputation … pic.twitter.com/5Fg3MvP7FT

— Julian Röpcke🇺🇦 (@JulianRoepcke) July 24, 2024

Like for real every morning now Julian Jihad post about that things don't going well for Ukraine but Ukraine is winning

https://twitter.com/julianroepcke/status/1815974453685240277

Here he shows the second encirclement

And one way more important to Ukraine since as you see its last og line that didn't moved.

If they lose that line this would happen

they will lose everything till that yellow like and battle of konstantin and chasiv yar would take place at same time

As you see the map is full with triangles and that means significant landscape. That place is basically death trap for offensive but nevertheless Ukrainian planned (or at least Zelenskyy been demanding) to attack in that direction and capture Horlivka

In this article from October 2023

When I raised these claims with a senior military officer, he said that some commanders have little choice in second-guessing orders from the top. At one point in early October, he said, the political leadership in Kyiv demanded an operation to "retake" the city of Horlivka, a strategic outpost in eastern Ukraine that the Russians have held and fiercely defended for nearly a decade. The answer came back in the form of a question: With what? "They don't have the men or the weapons," says the officer. "Where are the weapons? Where is the artillery? Where are the new recruits?"

But don't worry Ukraine did captured Horlivka

They basically captured one of those triangles on the map and called it "capture of Horlivka" it was basically krinky little, they held that triangle for mb couple of days but the story was in media for a month.

I already many times wrote the reason why:

Ukraine send all its assault reserves to north Kharkiv to have 6 to 1 advantage over Russian

And they were pushed back

Majority analyst were expecting Ukrainian success since the goal of Russian was just to pull Ukrainian reserves so Ukrainian don't counter attack in ocheretyne and etc

Yet Ukraine managed to lose

Ukraine legit hopped to "counter offensive" this year Horlivka or from belohorivka Lugansk. Booth those directions are and offensive capabilities gone.

But when everything looks bad pro khohol, don't forget you have f16 and

Russia tho suggested if Ukraine blows up Crimea bridge Russia will blow up "Kyiv Reservoir"

Wikipedia:

Worries about possible destruction arose again in February 2022 during the Kyiv offensive. Russian forces took control of the power plant on 25 or 26 February.[1] Ukrainian forces recaptured it on 26 February.[2] It was claimed that Ukrainian air defenses intercepted a missile flying towards the dam. Interfax stated that if the dam were to fail, flooding could destroy "the entire left bank of Kyiv".

So go Ukraine, it will literally make north east Ukraine very hard to supply

Based on extensive analysis of Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors returned to us due to instability issues, we have determined that elevated operating voltage is causing instability issues in some 13th/14th Gen desktop processors. Our analysis of returned processors confirms that the elevated operating voltage is stemming from a microcode algorithm resulting in incorrect voltage requests to the processor.

Intel is delivering a microcode patch which addresses the root cause of exposure to elevated voltages. We are continuing validation to ensure that scenarios of instability reported to Intel regarding its Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors are addressed. Intel is currently targeting mid-August for patch release to partners following full validation.

Intel is committed to making this right with our customers, and we continue asking any customers currently experiencing instability issues on their Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors reach out to Intel Customer Support for further assistance.

Other link - https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-finally-announces-a-solution-for-cpu-crashing-errors-claims-elevated-voltages-are-the-root-cause-fix-coming-by-mid-august

Intel statement on via oxidation

Short answer: We can confirm there was a via Oxidation manufacturing issue (addressed back in 2023) but it is not related to the instability issue.

Long answer: We can confirm that the via Oxidation manufacturing issue affected some early Intel Core 13th Gen desktop processors. However, the issue was root caused and addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in 2023. We have also looked at it from the instability reports on Intel Core 13th Gen desktop processors and the analysis to-date has determined that only a small number of instability reports can be connected to the manufacturing issue.

For the Instability issue, we are delivering a microcode patch which addresses exposure to elevated voltages which is a key element of the Instability issue. We are currently validating the microcode patch to ensure the instability issues for 13th/14th Gen are addressed. - Intel representative via Reddit.

Redditor explains why he is great role model

https://old.reddit.com/r/islam_ahmadiyya/comments/mbsokd/khabib_nurmagomedov_is_a_better_religious_role/

What I find more powerful than that is how devout he is towards Islam. In every promotion, he is always saying prayers and thanking God. Before he would step into the Octagon for a fight, he would do dua. After every fight, he would do sajda in the middle of the Octagon. He would train/fight even during Ramadan.

Nothing says great Islam promotion than launching shity corn flakes, nft, shit coins, game with loot boxes and etc for kids the only thing he forgot to release for those kids it's halal pig meat since he already released halal gambling

He has never smoked, drank, or had s*x before marriage despite having dozens of millions of dollars and having worldwide fame for mauling the shit out of people, being in the most susceptible position one can be for living that playboy lifestyle. Yet he remains humble and convicted in his faith.

He always would credit his success to Allah and his faith in Islam.

He mb doesn't question crypto shit but Islamic bank does and even right now it ain't halal to do this

https://www.mmanytt.com/latest-news/khabib-opens-up-about-his-religion-some-people-dont-like-this-r5/

KHABIB OPENS UP ABOUT HIS RELIGION: "SOME PEOPLE DON'T LIKE THIS"

Says his religion then goes talk about Islam, did he privatised Islam ?

He grew up poor in a conflict-torn Dagestan, and through dedication towards his craft and his faith in Allah, he's risen to the top of the world.

English Wikipedia don't fully translate how his dad was rich

An ethnic Avar, Nurmagomedov was born in 1962 in the village of Sildi, Tsumadinsky District. In 1987 he graduated from the Poltava University of Economics and Trade with a degree in accounting and economics.

You can be sure he didn't legit got his degree because 5 years of economy is not that easy especially Soviet economics, master in economics has to pass shit tons of math and statistics…

So he was one of those athlete college students in burgerland

His dad was far away from poor, he had his own gym and trained world gold medalist before Khabib was born

He didn't retire because he got old or felt that he wasn't as good as he used to be, he's only 32, which is the prime for MMA fighters. He retired because Khabib's fighting would take a toll on his mother, he stated that with every fight he could see that it was taking years from her, so he decided to retire.

Oh boy she probably got many years of youth that he is now wanted man in Russia for many reasons and that he covered terrorist that killed local cops

And things they knew in Dagestan for long that he did shade things and covered him because he was a "hero" but now ufff

The fact that he left behind millions of dollars, more fame and glory, out of concern that it might be negatively affecting his mother? That really inspires me to always do good things no matter what.

Any time he speaks, especially about his faith in Allah, it inspires me to be a good Muslim, even though i'm pretty agnostic.

Some of you may be asking: "How can a man famous for being the best at fighting be a good role model? How can such a person so good at violence be a good role model?"

A professional MMA fight happens in a controlled Octagon with a referee there to make sure that both fighters are safe.

Saying you are professional fighter and good Muslim is same if only fan prosetute says she is good Christian wife material.

It's literally haram to fight for money in Islam

It's like once I went to kino with couple of my friends and one was Muslim and after kino we just walked around the city and he decided he needs weed they bought weed and alcohol. (I didn't took part in it it's not kosher) neighbor got so high he started talking about Islam and how great it is and what great Muslim he is, I told him neighbor you are drunk and high.

https://old.reddit.com/r/islam_ahmadiyya/comments/mbsokd/comment/gs2gm38/?context=8

If I had active Reddit account I would had asked him how is his role model doing.

He pretty much will never return to Russia or leave Dubai because even burgerstan for lol can send him to Russia as example that U.S. is cooperating against terrorism

He also got this

Trump told he promised Khabib to destroy Gaza and stop war in Ukraine

It never ceases to amaze me that there are Americans scared of migration from Latin America. pic.twitter.com/2WqdEixIam

— Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) July 26, 2024

This lady

!fellas !coomers

!transphobes

!historychads @DeforesterCarpathian @Kang-PrimeTimeline @Governor @Soren @Bridge @IraniumDonGER @mithrandir

https://old.reddit.com/r/Cooking/comments/1eaf0qr/my_hamburgers_have_become_so_gross_that_my_boys/

SOS: My burgers have gone from family favorite to something no one wants.

Two boys, 13 and 25, used to devour my burgers like they hadn't seen a meal in ages. Now? They're leaving sad, barely-touched meat discs on their plates. My boys have opinions, and they're brutal: 'weird,' 'too dry,' 'too oily,' 'too greasy,' and the soul-crushing 'it doesn't have any taste.'

Tfw your kids call your food slop

Current recipe (use at your own risk): 7 oz of beef, manhandled into submission, flattened, and sacrificed to a medium-high skillet for 4 minutes per side. Cheese gets a 60-second cameo at the end. Brioche buns because I really do try to make my fam happy.

I've never had to season ground beef before, but maybe that's where I've gone wrong? Is there a secret burger society I'm not privy to? A bovine illuminati?

https://old.reddit.com/r/Cooking/comments/1eaf0qr/my_hamburgers_have_become_so_gross_that_my_boys/lel22d2/?context=8

Alright. Brutal honesty incoming:

Your family discovered what actual burgers should taste like and won't eat your slop anymore. I would NEVER eat meat without seasoning. That's unhinged.

Just use salt and pepper. Look up a recipe for how much per patty so you can learn how to properly season

even REDDITORS called his food slop

https://old.reddit.com/r/Cooking/comments/1eaf0qr/my_hamburgers_have_become_so_gross_that_my_boys/lel0mz9/?context=8

You've never had to season ground beef before? What?

We don't season our burgers either. We do split 1/2 a cow with a friend so our meat is farm to table. Sometimes we might be fancy and add seasoning and chopped onion but usually the toppings are the only thing we add.

You don't put salt on your burgers? A cow died for this.

And I respect them enough to not season when not necessary.

Ketchup is fill of sodium and I like ketchup on my burgers. I also like mustard and mayo. That's plenty of seasoning for me

I asked ChatGPT to summarize this article in a single paragraph, single apparently your average dramagoblin is too dopamine-friend to read more than three sentences without being distracted by bussy.

"In economics, "prices" are crucial signals that guide the market, determining what gets produced and consumed efficiently. When supply of a good falls short of demand, prices rise, prompting sellers to produce more until equilibrium is reached. Neoclassical economists argue that prices aren't fixed but discovered through market interactions. Antitrust laws prohibit companies from setting prices to exploit market power, which distorts competition. Prices act as information carriers in the market, influencing decisions from production to consumption. Attempts to manipulate prices, whether by monopolies or through surveillance pricing, undermine market fairness and efficiency. Regulatory efforts, like the FTC's inquiry into surveillance pricing, aim to curb such distortions, recognizing their threat to consumer welfare and economic stability."

——

In the mystical cosmology of economics, "prices" are of transcendental significance, the means by which the living market knows and adapts itself, giving rise to "efficient" production and consumption.

At its most basic level, the metaphysics of pricing goes like this: if there is less of something for sale than people want to buy, the seller will raise the price until enough buyers drop out and demand equals supply. If the disappointed would-be buyers are sufficiently vocal about their plight, other sellers will enter the market (bankrolled by investors who sense an opportunity), causing supplies to increase and prices to fall until the system is in "equilibrium" - producing things as cheaply as possible in precisely the right quantities to meet demand. In the parlance of neoclassical economists, prices aren't "set": they are discovered.

In antitrust law, there are many sins, but they often boil down to "price setting." That is, if a company has enough "market power" that they can dictate prices to their customers, they are committing a crime and should be punished. This is such a bedrock of neoclassical economics that it's a tautology "market power" exists where companies can "set prices"; and to "set prices," you need "market power."

Prices are the blood cells of the market, shuttling nutrients (in the form of "information") around the sprawling colony organism composed of all the buyers, sellers, producers, consumers, intermediaries and other actors. Together, the components of this colony organism all act on the information contained in the "price signals" to pursue their own self-interest. Each self-interested action puts more information into the system, triggering more action. Together, price signals and the actions they evince eventually "discover" the price, an abstraction that is yanked out of the immaterial plane of pure ideas and into our grubby, physical world, causing mines to re-open, shipping containers and pipelines to spark to life, factories to retool, trucks to fan out across the nation, retailers to place ads and hoist SALE banners over their premises, and consumers to race to those displays and open their wallets.

When prices are "distorted," all of this comes to naught. During the notorious "socialist calculation debate" of 1920s Austria, right-wing archdukes of religious market fundamentalism, like Von Hayek and Von Mises, trounced their leftist opponents, arguing that the market was the only computational system capable of calculating how much of each thing should be made, where it should be sent, and how much it should be sold for.

Attempts to "plan" the economy - say, by subsidizing industries or limiting prices - may be well-intentioned, but they broke the market's computations and produced haywire swings of both over- and underproduction. Later, the USSR's planned economy did encounter these swings. These were sometimes very grave (famines that killed millions) and sometimes silly (periods when the only goods available in regional shops were forks, say, creating local bubbles in folk art made from forks).

Unplanned markets do this too. Most notoriously, capitalism has produced a vast oversupply of carbon-intensive goods and processes, and a huge undersupply of low-carbon alternatives, bringing the human civilization to the brink of collapse. Not only have capitalism's price signals failed to address this existential crisis to humans, it has also sown the seeds of its own ruin - the market computer's not going to be getting any "price signals" from people as they drown in floods or roast to death on sidewalks that deliver delivery second-degree burns to anyone who touches them:

https://www.fastcompany.com/91151209/extreme-heat-southwest-phoenix-surface-burns-scorching-pavement-sidewalks-pets

For market true believers, these failures are just evidence that regulation is distorting markets, and that the answer is more unregulated markets to infuse the computer with more price signals. When it comes to carbon, the problem is that producers are "producing negative externalities" (that is, polluting and sticking us with the bill). If we can just get them to "internalize" those costs, they will become "economically rational" and switch to low-carbon alternatives.

That's the theory behind the creation and sale of carbon credits. Rather than ordering companies to stop risking civilizational collapse and mass extinction, we can incentivize them to do so by creating markets that reward clean tech and punish dirty practices. The buying and selling of carbon credits is supposed to create price signals reflecting the existential risk to the human race and the only habitable planet known to our species, which the market will then "bring into equilibrium."

Unfortunately, reality has a distinct and unfair leftist bias. Carbon credits are a market for lemons. The carbon credits you buy to "offset" your car or flight are apt to come from a forest that has already burned down, or that had already been put in a perpetual trust as a wildlife preserve and could never be logged:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/03/18/greshams-carbon-law/#papal-indulgences

Carbon credits produce the most perverse outcomes imaginable. For example, much of Tesla's profitability has been derived from the sale of carbon credits to the manufacturers of the dirtiest, most polluting SUVs on Earth; without those Tesla credits, those SUVs would have been too expensive to sell, and would not have existed:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/11/24/no-puedo-pagar-no-pagara/#Rat

What's more, carbon credits aren't part of an "all of the above" strategy that incorporates direct action to prevent our species downfall. These market solutions are incompatible with muscular direct action, and if we do credits, we can't do other stuff that would actually work:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/31/carbon-upsets/#big-tradeoff

Even though price signals have repeatedly proven themselves to be an insufficient mechanism for producing "efficient" or even "survivable," they remain the uppermost spiritual value in the capitalist pantheon. Even through the last 40 years of unrelenting assaults on antitrust and competition law, the one form of corporate power that has remained both formally and practically prohibited is "pricing power."

That's why the DoJ was able to block tech companies and major movie studios from secretly colluding to suppress their employees' wages, and why those employees were able to get huge sums out of their employers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation

It's also why the Big Six (now Big Five) publishers and Apple got into so much trouble for colluding to set a floor on the price of ebooks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Apple_(2012)

When it comes to monopoly, even the most Bork-pilled, Manne-poisoned federal judges and agencies have taken a hard line on price-fixing, because "distortions" of prices make the market computer crash.

But despite this horror of price distortions, America's monopolists have found so many ways to manipulate prices. Last month, The American Prospect devoted an entire issue to the many ways that monopolies and cartels have rigged the prices we pay, pushing them higher and higher, even as our wages stagnated and credit became more expensive:

https://prospect.org/pricing

For example, there's the plague of junk fees (AKA "drip pricing," or, if you're competing to be first up against the wall come the revolution, "ancillary revenue"), everything from baggage fees from airlines to resort fees at hotels to the fee your landlord charges if you pay your rent by check, or by card, or in cash:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/07/drip-drip-drip/#drip-off

There's the fake transparency gambit, so beloved of America's hospitals:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/13/a-punch-in-the-guts/#hayek-pilled

The "greedflation" that saw grocery prices skyrocketing, which billionaire grocery plutes blamed on covid stimulus checks, even as they boasted to their shareholders about their pricing power:

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-06-12-war-in-the-aisles/

There's the the tens of billions the banks rake in with usurious interest rates, far in excess of the hikes to the central banks' prime rates (which are, in turn, justified in light of the supposed excesses of covid relief checks):

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-06-11-what-we-owe/

There are the scams that companies like Amazon pull with their user interfaces, tricking you into signing up for subscriptions or upsells, which they grandiosely term "dark patterns," but which are really just open fraud:

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-06-10-one-click-economy/

There are "surge fees," which are supposed to tempt more producers (e.g. Uber drivers) into the market when demand is high, but which are really just an excuse to gouge you - like when Wendy's threatens to surge-price its hamburgers:

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-06-07-urge-to-surge/

And then there's surveillance pricing, the most insidious and profitable way to jack up prices. At its core, surveillance pricing uses nonconsensually harvested private information to inform an algorithm that reprices the things you buy - from lattes to rent - in real-time:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/05/your-price-named/#privacy-first-again

Companies like Plexure - partially owned by McDonald's - boasts that it can use surveillance data to figure out what your payday is and then hike the price of the breakfast sandwich or after-work soda you buy every day.

Like every bad pricing practice, surveillance pricing has its origins in the aviation industry, which invested early on and heavily in spying on fliers to figure out how much they could each afford for their plane tickets and jacking up prices accordingly. Architects of these systems then went on to found companies like Realpage, a data-brokerage that helps landlords illegally collude to rig rent prices.

Algorithmic middlemen like Realpage and ATPCO - which coordinates price-fixing among the airlines - are what Dan Davies calls "accountability sinks." A cartel sends all its data to a separate third party, which then compares those prices and tells everyone how much to jack them up in order to screw us all:

https://profilebooks.com/work/the-unaccountability-machine/

These price-fixing middlemen are everywhere, and they predate the boom in commercial surveillance. For example, Agri-Stats has been helping meatpackers rig the price of meat for 40 years:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/04/dont-let-your-meat-loaf/#meaty-beaty-big-and-bouncy

But when you add commercial surveillance to algorithmic pricing, you get a hybrid more terrifying than any cocaine-sharks (or, indeed, meth-gators):

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tennessee-police-warn-locals-not-flush-drugs-fear-meth-gators-n1030291

Apologists for these meth-gators insist that surveillance pricing's true purpose is to let companies offer discounts. A streaming service can't afford to offer $0.99 subscriptions to the poor because then all the rich people would stop paying $19.99. But with surveillance advertising, every customer gets a different price, titrated to their capacity to pay, and everyone wins.

But that's not how it cashes out in the real world. In the real world, rich people who get ripped off have the wherewithal to shop around, complain effectively to a state AG, or punish companies by taking their business elsewhere. Meanwhile, poor people aren't just cash-poor, they're also time-poor and political influence-poor.

When the dollar store duopoly forces all the mom-and-pop grocers in your town out of business with predatory pricing, and creating food deserts that only they serve, no one cares, because state AGs and politicians don't care about people who shop at dollar stores. Then, the dollar stores can collude with manufacturers to get shrunken "cheater sized" products that sell for a dollar, but cost double or triple the grocery store price by weight or quantity:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/27/walmarts-jackals/#cheater-sizes

Yes, fliers who seem to be flying on business (last-minute purchasers who don't have a Saturday stay) get charged more than people whose purchase makes them seem to be someone flying away for a vacation. But that's only because aviation prices haven't yet fully transitioned to surveillance pricing. If an airline can correctly calculate that you are taking a trip because you're a grad student who must attend a conference in order to secure a job, and if they know precisely how much room you have left on your credit card, they can charge you everything you can afford, to the cent.

Your ability to resist pricing power isn't merely a function of a company's market power - it's also a function of your political power. Poor people may have less to steal, but no one cares when they get robbed:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/19/martha-wright-reed/#capitalists-hate-capitalism

So surveillance pricing, supercharged by algorithms, represent a serious threat to "prices," which is the one thing that the econo-religious fundamentalists of the capitalist class value above all else. That makes surveillance pricing low-hanging fruit for regulatory enforcement: a bipartisan crime that has few champions on either side of the aisle.

Cannily, the FTC has just declared war on surveillance pricing, ordering eight key players in the industry (including capitalism's arch-villains, McKinsey and Jmorgan Chase) to turn over data that can be used to prosecute them for price-fixing within 45 days:

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/07/ftc-issues-orders-eight-companies-seeking-information-surveillance-pricing

As American Prospect editor-in-chief David Dayen notes in his article on the order, the FTC is doing what he and his journ*listic partners couldn't: forcing these companies to cough up internal data:

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-07-24-ftc-opens-surveillance-pricing-inquiry/

This is important, and not just because of the wriggly critters the FTC will reveal as they use their powers to turn over this rock. Administrative agencies can't just do whatever they want. Long before the agencies were neutered by the Supreme Court, they had strict rules requiring them to gather evidence, solicit comment and counter-comment, and so on, before enacting any rules:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/18/administrative-competence/#i-know-stuff

Doubtless, the Supreme Court's *Loper" decision (which overturned "Chevron deference" and cut off the agencies' power to take actions that they don't have detailed, specific authorization to take) will embolden the surveillance pricing industry to take the FTC to court on this. It's hard to say whether the courts will find in the FTC's favor. Section 6(b) of the FTC Act clearly lets the FTC compel these disclosures as part of an enforcement action, but they can't start an enforcement action until they have evidence, and through the whole history of the FTC, these kinds of orders have been a common prelude to enforcement.

One thing this has going for it is that it is bipartisan: all five FTC commissioners, including both Republicans (including the Republican who votes against everything) voted in favor of it. Price gouging is the kind of easy-to-grasp corporate crime that everyone hates, irrespective of political tendency.

In the Prospect piece on Ticketmaster's pricing scam, Dayen and Groundwork's Lindsay Owens called this the "Age of Recoupment":

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/03/aoi-aoi-oh/#concentrated-gains-vast-diffused-losses

For 40 years, neoclassical economics' focus on "consumer welfare" meant that companies could cheat and squeeze their workers and suppliers as hard as they wanted, so long as prices didn't go up. But after 40 years, there's nothing more to squeeze out of workers or suppliers, so it's time for the cartels to recoup by turning on us, their customers.

They believe - perhaps correctly - that they have amassed so much market power through mergers and lobbying that they can cross the single bright line in neoliberal economics' theory of antitrust: price-gouging. No matter how sincere the economics profession's worship of prices might be, it still might not trump companies that are too big to fail and thus too big to jail.

The FTC just took an important step in defense of all of our economic wellbeing, and it's a step that even the most right-wing economist should applaud. They're calling the question: "Do you really think that price-distortion is a cardinal sin? If so, you must back our play."

——

This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

!straggots Explain yourselves

TLDR: it's because there is a way higher expectation to be financially successful and to not spend time on "useless" things placed on men because of course there is.

This article is r-slurred. Everybody could have already guessed this…except probably the antiwork r-slurs. I think it would be fun to mess with them. Either pretending that article is capitalist propaganda or posting that "maybe I was wrong about being anti work all along and I'm scared I'm going to hurt my children".