None

					
					

!foidmoment

None
None

					
					
					
	

				
None
34
Anyone having any luck dating the "old fashioned way"? :marseywomanmoment2:

					
					

I (47 F) found out that my 7+ year relation was over via FB when I saw pictures of my SO (49 M) on vacation with another woman.

We were long distance starting right before COVID, so we hadn't seen each other in a couple of years.

I was still putting in the effort. He was not.

Apparently, he had decided it was over & just figured I would get the hint if he stopped speaking to me. This was AFTER we had several long conversations about our relationship being basically a marriage without the piece of paper. He thought the piece of paper didn't matter. And, although I agreed, apparently I was the only one who took the commitment seriously.

Anyway, when I confronted him about it, he just ignored me. Go figure. So, I contacted her. She didn't know anything about me, so SHE confronted HIM. They had been together just about 6 months & he hadn't told her anything about me. Although, they had talked about moving in together & getting married, things he & I had agreed we were not quite ready for yet. Apparently , that was just for me.

Cut out the rest of the boring 888 :marseylongpost: Foid is very surprised that her LDR relationship with a man she hasn't seen in years is over, finds out the new fangled internet way. :marseylaughpoundfist:

She rightly gets pilloried in the comments, leading to some incredible mental gymnastics:

You say you were basically married to someone you hadn't seen in years. There's no such thing. Either you are married or you are not. And not seeing someone for years means you aren't even in a relationship. He didn't tell you because I think most people would gather that. :marseyautism:

So, you're saying anyone who doesn't see their significant other for a couple of years & still thinks they have a relationship is stupid? :marseyagree: I know a few military families that would beg to differ. Regardless, I gave him repeated opportunities to bow out gracefully, but he assured me everything was fine. Not everyone who has been married before is down for getting married again. I thought that was the agreement. But I guess that was his escape clause. I am upset that he cheated, I won't lie about that. But what really hurt, what made me more sad/angry/betrayed/every other emotion than anything else was being lied to. Being told repeatedly that everything is fine, that there is this future waiting for us, only to find out that the first opportunity he got, he took, and still reassured me that everything was fine.

Mega cope jfc :marseywall:

Still coping as of three hours ago:

Seriously though. Honey, you're young & you have yet to meet all the men who are going to piss you off. Eventually, you'll find the right one who will piss you off about the right things. It will make sense later. Hopefully he's good looking & has a nice butt. Long distance is hella hard. I was a sailor and a Navy wife and just ended a 7 year relationship because we were long distance for a couple of years, thanks COVID, and I found out via FB that he had been cheating. But I digress. Long distance is hard. Even for the strongest of relationships. I don't know how long y'all have been together, but this doesn't bode well for your relationship once you're separated by miles & not just a few hours of work. You're going to be in a new place, experiencing new things, meeting new people. Do you really want to be saddled with a lame boyfriend who chose hiking with the guys over you on your last weekend when you're meeting new "people"? Just remember, be safe, take care of you, wear sunscreen, make him wear a condom :marseyspal: & always have $ for an Uber

This post is basically a figleaf to try out the newfangled redditor harassment tech, so /u/lagx777 please join and elaborate further :bitchplease:

None

She's nuked all her socials already.

Bar's TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@hubbardinnchicago/video/7345947161005133102

Reddit discussions:

https://old.reddit.com/r/chicago/comments/1bes198/hubbard_inn_responds_to_tiktokers_allegation_of/

https://old.reddit.com/r/ImTheMainCharacter/comments/1bf44vp/hubbard_inn_responds_to_morons_allegations_of/

https://old.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/comments/1bf1wgx/to_lie_about_being_pushed_down_the_stairs_by_bar/

https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1beu34j/hubbard_inn_responds_to_tiktokers_allegation_of/

None

					
					

OP is not only a Leaf hooker, they're a janny for Canadian hooker subs :marseylaugh:

None
Reported by:

					
					

(OP said she thought she was asexual until she discovered that her mother had her fun button removed.)

Selected comments:

I'm asexual, don't have s*x, and I am still a successful person doing a lot with my life so I don't think it's the end of the world

Yeah sis, someone having her clit dug out with a rusty spoon :marseysaladfingers: is totally fine because s*x doesn't matter to you personally :marseychonkernoticeme:


I mean, first of all, an Ace person wouldn't be upset at all about not being able to feel sexual pleasure.

I'd love to not feel anything. I find it to be an inconvenience that comes with my body, rather than a good thing.

The clitlet actually apologized for upsetting this person, lmao


You likely are asexual. A woman's clitoris is much much more than the bump up top, the nerves curl all the way around the vaginal opening down to around the anus.

Reddit psychologists :marseychefkiss:

There's also a few slapfights about circumcision dotted around the thread.

None

					
					
					
	

				
None
30
:marseywomanmoment2:
None

!britbongs @BussyBoy

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101094137398388.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101094132417748.webp

People were already sus about the photo this morning

None

By confirmed dead, I mean a car crash has been scheduled in a Paris tunnel.

Twitter foids seem really into this so let's see how gay this website really is.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17100676043710032.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1710067640002835.webp

None
21
What was the plan here?

None
21
Femcels

					
					
					
	

				
None
None

					
					

Context: Dr. Charlotte Proudman is a gigafeminist known for her hot takes, including:

Today, she has launched a campaign to change the law so that moids have to prove a foid consented when defending an accusation of r*pe. In her own words:

It would put the onus on defendants to show how she consented, if she wanted to have s*x, if she was asked if she wanted to have s*x, what steps did she take to make sure that she was wanting to have s*x and was enthusiastic about it.

Proudman (who I have personally diagnosed as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder) decided to make herself the face of the campaign, producing this wonderful poster:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1709671829612153.webp

The slogan itself has become a point of contention:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096721270529974.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096721271223457.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096721271945784.webp

https://x.com/BiFelicia319/status/1765044078897471864

https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910

https://x.com/Daisy_J_S/status/1765096615352959472

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1709672280848292.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096722809274642.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096722810108292.webp

https://x.com/LizMaryWard/status/1765065360271888644

https://x.com/beesley_cathy/status/1765059359447330969

https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910

Selected comments:

This is obviously r-slurred, but naturally there are some male feminists arguing against their own self-interest :malefeminist:

Why do you think this switches the burden of proof to the accused?

Because that's literally what she said it does? :marseyshrug:


The criminalisation of basic human behaviour continues.

I'm 30, there are only a handful of times the woman actually said ‘let's have s*x'

Which 'basic human behaviour' are you referring to, coercing women into s*x?

:marseysnoo: That Redditor should be arrested for not getting the consent forms signed!


I feel that these sorts of things are proposed in bad faith to make feminists look ridiculous.

:marseygigaretard: Feminists would never say something completely r-slurred unless they were plants.

None
55
Internet folks appreciating valid weight gain is now creepy apparently.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096409893208213.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096409896807854.webp

BECAUSE YOU ARE VISIBLE FROM SPACE:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096409900691724.webp

Finding plump foids attractive is a crime:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096409902169425.webp

None

					
					
					
	

				
None

					
					
					
	

				
None

					
					
					
	

				
None
15
Foid moment :marseywomanmoment2:
None

"I've been thinking about this for a while and there's no other place I can express it, so here it is. Tell me what you think of the following idea:

Men are not capable of romantic love. They pretend to love women to get free labor (s*x/mommy bangmaid)

High value men (hot/rich) will use the promise of love to trick as many women as possible into free s*x, if/when a HVM wants children he will enter an established relationship with an attractive younger woman long enough to convince her to birth his children. If he isn't rich, he will likely stay with her long-term to avoid child support/get free domestic labor/boost his image. If he is rich he will not stay long-term, unless to boost his image. Regardless, HVM will not be loyal, and will cheat if they think they can get away with it.

Low value men (average/ugly and not rich) will use "love", or the potential of it, to trick women into relationships so they can get free s*x/mommy bangmaid they wouldn't be able to get otherwise. They deeply resent the fact that they can't have whatever woman they want like the HVM, and will often take it out on women, especially the women they're in relationships with. They would cheat if given the chance, they just usually aren't. This creates the illusion of love and loyalty."

:#marseywalltyping:

!nonchuds

None

					
					

We had filled out the paperwork not too long prior, but he said he wanted to give it another go. That didn't last long. He changed, got mad when I didn't change with him. I'm not going in to the whole thing again, but man, I am still angry. He wanted the divorce in the first place, he also wanted to "make it work", but he also didn't want to try anything other than me changing.

:#marseywomanmoment2:

None

:marseypuke: :marseywall:

None
36
Its 2024 :capy2022: and Whemen still get asked DISGUSTANG :marseydisgust: questions like this :smh:

I wonder what carp would do if he was alive to see this

@A pls pin in memory of carp

!sk8trbois assemble

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.