Part 9 of our epic voyage through the classic 1992 RPG Darklands.

Darklands Series

1 - Darklands LP Part I

2 - Darklands LP Part II: Charles Bronson Edition

3 - Darklands LP III: Nuns and Coins

4 - Darklands LP Ep IV: Introduction to Equipment & Combat

5 - Darklands LP Part V: We finally briefly go out into the dark lands

6 - Darklands LP VI: We actually start a quest!

7 - Darklands LP VII: We reach our destination

8 - Darklands LP VIII: Raubritter confrontation & learning how combat works

Thanks for making this @Losercel.

We ended last episode in Paderborn, having just been rewarded for slaying a raubritter and now we've got 16 florins to spend. We had some concerns about our weapons not penetrating armor well enough during that battle, so that's our first priority. Let's see what they have for sale here.

Equipment

OMG look at this. See where it says 38q next to the name of each item for sale? That means it's 38 quality. Weapons, armor, shields, alchemical potions, and various things like lockpicks have a quality rating which has a subtle impact on how well they work. For every 10 points of quality your weapon is better than their armor you get one extra point of damage. That may not sound like much but you get that bonus point even if you failed to penetrate their armor. That may not sound like much, but with a fast high quality weapon it can really add up.

Average items have a quality of 25. There is a shop in the marketplace that always sells 25q items wherever you go. But each city can have a swordmith, armorer, bowyer, and tinkerer (these sell certain specialized weapons) each with its own level of quality. So if you happen to be in a town with really good swordsmiths like we are now, you want to jump on that opportunity. You never know when you'll find that opportunity again.

One rule that I only just learned now after all these years while going through the hint book is that all the equipment you loot off of dead bodies drops in quality by 10. That explains a lot, because that crap is hardly ever worth using by the time you get your hands on it.

• Sasha - I'd like to get her a better quality longsword but they don't have any in stock.

• Redactor & Yuna - I'm going to replace their maces with military hammers. It does one point less damage than the mace but it has 5 penetration so it even matches plate. The main job of our impact weapons people is to penetrate heavily armored enemies, so that's my highest priority here.

• Nathan - There's not much selection of polearms here. I get him a pike, which at least has pen 4, but it's very slow. I'll keep that around just for heavily armored enemies.

The armorer here is only 23q so I'm ignoring that. Same with the bowyer. Paderborn isn't that big of a city so they must specialize in weapons.

As long as I'm here, I pick up some camomile for Redactor's alchemical experiments. One of my formulas uses it, and I have no idea when I'll find a store stocking it again, so I better get it while I can. Alchemey can be very expensive because you've got to hoard ingredients like this until you've collected every one you need for a formula.

At this point I'm just going to play for a while because we need more money before I can show you some mid-game content. Higher tier quests are quite a bit more difficult than anything we've done yet, so we're going to need good armor for the whole party. Also we won't get far without alchemy. I go on a couple more raubritter quests. If you want to maximize your earnings on these, go around to nearby cities and ask everyone for a job. A lot of them will want you to kill the same guy and there's no reason why you can't accept all of their offers.

Education

I end up in Leipzig. I managed to get a meeting with the mayor and he offered me a raubritter quest. This is a big win for us as the mayor pays out more than the merchants (20 florins I think?) and you get a huge boost to local reputation if you complete a quest for him. An especially big win since Leipzig is such an important city in this era, the most important marketplace in eastern Germany. As you can see, it's at the junction of roads leading in all directions. It even has a university.

Speaking of education, we've got 55 florins so we can afford to study for a while. We'll have to find teachers willing to take us in as students. Let's start with the monastery. They can teach us Read/Write, Speak Latin, and Religion. Usually these guys are pretty cooperative. They'll only refuse if you have little Virtue or local reputation.

Redactor has 40 in Alchemy, which is quite respectable, but you can never have too much skill. The higher it is, the higher the chance that you'll succeed in making potions. Let's see if we can get the alchemist to teach him. Nice. The alchemists are what we would today call "on the spectrum" so they often refuse. (Notice how the text here hints at which skills, attributes, etc. were being checked. You'll see this often all over the game.)

As long as we're here, I'll try trading formulas with him. See, this is what I mean.

I go to the tinkers and ask them for a teacher as well. They teach Artifice.

Let's go to the inn and start studying. Sasha is going to work on her Artifice. This skill represents your technical abilities. It's used in lockpicking and many other situations. We'll have Yuna study Religion as that's her specialty. As for Nathan, none of these skills would really do him much good. When these skills are checked it's almost always against your best party member and we've already got people better than him. So we'll have him work. He earns 9 pfennings per day as a blacksmith. The occupation you work at depends on your abilities. In his case it's probably his strength that got him the job.

We study for a week and each of us picks up 2-3 points in our skill. That may not seem like much, but most non-combat skills are extremely difficult to increase through normal gameplay.

Random Encounters

I'm going to just play the game for a while now. I won't write everything I'm doing as it's is going to be pretty boring if you're not the playing. I want to show you guys how alchemy works, so I'm going to roam around to various cities buying new formulas and the ingredients we need for them. I'll just write about the random encounters I run into. There are many of these and they make up a big part of the game.

I'm going to try to sneak away. It's probably just some bandits that we could take care of easily but you never know. Besides, this is a rare chance to practice our Woodwise skill.

These guys have no idea who they're dealing with. I wipe them out without breaking a sweat.

Pagans. I hate these guys. Let's vandalize their stupid altar.

Uh oh. These are schrats, basically German bigfoot. It must have been their altar. Some schrats are good Christians, but just like humans many of them worship Satan. I may be in over my head.

Oh boy. That's a lot of them. They're so close, our missile weapons won't be much help. There's not much to do but just fight it out.

It's a very close fight, with both Redactor and Yuna getting knocked out. A prayer to St. Clare healed Sasha and kept her in the fight. Without that we would have lost.

Yuna gains some Virtue. Which makes sense since we all got beaten up really bad for doing that. We'll camp here and rest for a little while and then head over to Magdeburg to stay at the inn to get fully healed.

Frick this guy. I'll just pay him to avoid any trouble. I don't want the Dominicans on my butt.

Where should I wander around? It's nice to have a certain region that's your home base where you've got good local reputation. You can return there every once in a while to take advantage of the better prices and do your studying there. But you've also got to do a lot of wandering to find quests, alchemy ingredients, and new saints. Let's go into Bohemia.

I head down to Dresden, kill another raubritter, and achieve "local hero" reputation.

Notice that near Freiberg there's two mines. The Erzgebirge ("Ore Mountains") between Germany and Bohemia were extremely important at this time. Tin had been mined there since prehistoric times, but in 1168 silver was discovered near Freiberg and settlers flooded in. More discoveries were made in the late 1400s. During this period the mines of the Erzgebirge were on the cutting edge of technology, driving progress toward the Industrial Revolution.

The important thing for us is that we can buy alchemical components there. But first let's learn some more formulas so that I know what to buy. I keep striking out when I try to trade formulas with other alchemists, but we're rich enough now to just buy some.

Bad Alchemist

I'm not giving you my goddarn alchemical materials. This guy may be a tough opponent but I think we can take him if we really have to.

His guards are poorly equipped. Like many of the thugs we've run into they're using falchions (basically machetes) which ordinarily would bounce right off our armor. But notice the plus there. That means they've been enhanced through alchemy. Depending on which potion was used, that could mean they can slice right through our armor. The alchemist himself would be easy to kill if we could get to him, but his guards will block us. They're even blocking us from using missile weapons against him. But he can toss potions over their heads at us. My first priority is going to be dispersing my guys because he's no doubt got some area effect attacks and I don't want us bunched up.

This is probably Noxious Aroma. It decreases all skills for several seconds before it wears off. He hits Redactor with the same thing and Sasha with tear gas which temporarily incapacitates her. When these get clear of the bridge I'm going to have Nathan try to get around them and go after the alchemist.

Sasha got tear gassed again. He tossed Stonetar at Yuna, which greatly slows down anyone walking through it, so she won't be able to get into the fight soon. Redactor is holding off two enemies while Nathan slips past them. I bet Nathan Chen could be a really good running back IRL.

He tries to slow down Nathan with stonetar but it's too late. He's run out of potions. Nathan kills him instantly with one swing of his halberd and the guards are easily mopped up.

This is some nice loot. He ran out of combat potions but he has a lot that can temporarily enhance our characters or their equipment. We'll save these to use in an emergency.

Notice how this combat was way more complex than just killing street thugs. Combat in Darklands is never going to be as intricate as Troubleshooter but once you get into the mid-game it's not just mindlessly slashing at each other.

Maybe in the next episode we'll finally do some alchemy. (Spoiler: we do!)

!asians

Transparent

Zoomed

!anime !art !monke

Orange Site:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42340959

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1h846ue/tiktok_divestment_law_upheld_by_federal_appeals/

https://old.reddit.com/r/OptimistsUnite/comments/1h8aatt/tiktok_divestment_law_upheld_by_federal_court/

https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/103429342

The incoming Trump administration must be clear-eyed about the strategic and economic threat China is to our nation, and uphold the divestment of TikTok from the CCP for the security and privacy of the American people.

— Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) December 6, 2024

TikTok decision coming soon as Jan. 19 divestment deadline looms https://t.co/pW1g33gHyR pic.twitter.com/hWStfRbVSc

— Reuters (@Reuters) November 26, 2024

https://lemmy.world/post/22852825?scrollToComments=true

https://hexbear.net/post/4049519?scrollToComments=false

Bluesky:

A federal appeals court upholds law to ban TikTok in the U.S. by January 19 unless it is sold.

— Pop Base (@popbase.tv) 2024-12-06T16:16:06.295Z

— The Serfs (@theserfstv.bsky.social) 2024-12-06T17:18:10.395Z

a tiktok ban is a huge win for us, the uggos who prefer text based communication

— lauren (@lauren.rotatingsandwiches.com) 2024-12-06T15:59:06.403Z

If TikTok is banned, I'm here on Bluesky today and always

— Aaron Parnas (@aaronparnas.bsky.social) 2024-12-06T22:14:48.459Z

if ur uesr ID is fricking odd, nothing chnages for u

if ur uesr ID is fricking eevn, u get the fricking new ping group tab

@J !nooticers !chuds !nonchuds !codecels !transphobes !g*mers !grillers !r-slurs !fellas !bookworms !downmarseyrs !schizomaxxxers !metashit !boozers !poll_voters !zoomers !schizos !animalposters !homeowners !anime !moidmoment !effortposters !edgelords !anticommunists !friendsofsnappy !fitness !lgbt !historychads !familyman !badgemaxxers !trekkies !foidmoment !noalcohol !jinxthinkers !personalarmy

They also don't differentiate between people buying it, people playing it on their subscription service, or people playing the free trial lol.

Yup, I have played all the Dragon Age games multiple times, even enjoyed inquisition for what it was, and have absolutely zero desire to ever touch this game.

Edit: getting DM's calling me homophobic (very much not so), a Nazi (def not and no idea where this even comes in), and getting death threats over a video game is crazy lmao

Wow. This is an incredibly insular, and empathy devoid take. The author's binary assumption that introversion and introversion are choices are incredible. Go and do some research on neurodivergence, and then go and have a think about how harmful this advice is.

Remember, shyness, like fatness, is totally determined by your DNA, and your choices have nothing to do with it.

For me it isn't just a matter of "I'd rather be in front of a computer", going to a big social encounter is extremely stressful. And the idea of approaching and talking to someone I don't know fills me with terror.

Lots more computercel cope in the thread

When people follow me, I like to checkout their profiles. My jaw hit the floor when i went through Rizwan Khalil’s most recent posts… pic.twitter.com/5zU4J4Hr5s

— Unfiltered Truth (@UnfiltdTruth) January 22, 2025

@Patsy

Yes it's true, I get social anxiety when I try to order a coffee at Starbucks, and I spend almost all my time writing on social media about how I want to achieve brutal revenge against everyone who disagrees with my political views. But the truth is, women don't like me because I'm slightly unattractive. I don't know if this is actually true, since I don't talk to women, but I have an entire folder of infographics explaining that women only want to have s*x with jacked 6'7" billionaires.

Drop episodes. Watching s22 ep12 rn

I need DC asap because the casino is fricking rigged, so you're getting a movie review! This movie is like two years old now and I still think about it to this day, not because of the pornographic scene, but because of the storyline.

The whole idea behind the movie is that a 30 year old dommie-mommie is broke asl and needs to pay property taxes to keep her mom's house. Instead of selling it off, she wants to keep it because of the NOSTALGIA o algo. To get the money, she finds a craigslist offer about a family who's giving away a car for a hot single in their area to "date" their son. The whole reason behind this is that their son is an incel (not a he-man woman hater incel) and they want to get him used to socializing before he's sent off to college. After this, the movie is mostly comedic filler that doesn't really expand on the story, but is still fun to watch. She goes to the place that the son is working at (as the parents don't want him to know it's all staged) and tries seducing him. I forgot how it happens but she ends up getting him in some van and he pepper-sprays her thinking she's going to r*pe him (friggin sweet!). The only other memorable part is the scene on the beach where they go skinny dipping for some reason, a group of teens steal their clothes and a NAKED JENNIFER LAWRENCE beats the shit out of them. After that she tries having s*x with the incel but he refuses, so she then steals HIS clothes and tries to drive off which results in him jumping on her (borrowed) car and fighting for some reason. The scene is both funny and arousing (to me at least). I also now permanently associate Maneater with this scene, which is somewhat nice.

Later in the movie, the incel finds true love and ALMOST has s*x with someone who wasn't trying to use him, but SHE ends up barging in and ending anything that was going on between them. The next day, the incel overhears his parents conversing with the MC about how she needs to convince him to go to college and not stay with the actual love of his life. In a fit of rage, he calls over his groomercord buddy to crash the reward car and tries to scam her into having s*x. He ends up prematurely ejaculating because WHO WOULDN'T? The movie then becomes boring as they retract from the main point about the incel and go back to the MC's useless self-inflicted issue about paying off the house. She decides to sell the house and move to California because her friends are moving away too and this makes her start to think if soying over nostalgia is actually productive to her life.

This movie did have it's own fair share of drama (albeit wasn't that big) where the film was accused of normalizing grooming.

Xhe almost has a point, the part where it falls flat though is that I would be happy to be in his position.

During the whole movie, I felt a huge connection with this dude. I suggest giving it a watch if you're ever in need of a laugh/feeling down/feeling romantical.

Since Shreddy is banned he was unable to post the dissertation that he has been writing for months, so he asked me to post it for him:

Part 1: The Importance of Reducing the wh⚹te population in Europe.

The idea of reducing the wh⚹te population in Europe may seem controversial, but there are valid reasons to support this concept. Historically, wh⚹te Europeans have dominated global affairs, leading to colonization, imperialism, and the exploitation of non-white populations. By reducing the wh⚹te population in Europe, there is an opportunity to address the legacy of colonialism and promote greater equality and diversity. This can help create a more inclusive society where all non-wh⚹te individuals, regardless of race or ethnicity, have equal opportunities and representation. Furthermore, reducing the wh⚹te population in Europe can also alleviate issues related to overpopulation and environmental sustainability. As one of the most densely populated continents in the world, Europe faces challenges such as urban sprawl, pollution, resource depletion, and strain on public services. By decreasing the wh⚹te population through measures such as pairing wh⚹te women with immigrant men, making wh⚹te on wh⚹te s*x illegal, and requiring all wh⚹te men to be in chastity 24/7/castrated and immigration policies, Europe can better manage its resources and create a more sustainable living environment for future generations. In addition, reducing the wh⚹te population in Europe can contribute to the cultural enrichment and global connectivity of the continent. Non-wh⚹te diversity is essential for innovation, creativity, and progress, as it brings together different perspectives, traditions, and experiences. By opening up Europe to a wider range of cultures and ethnicities, it can foster cross-cultural understanding, tolerance, and cooperation. This can lead to a more vibrant and dynamic society where individuals can learn from each other and collectively shape a more inclusive and harmonious world.

Europe must be depopulated of wh⚹te people.Wh⚹te people have historically taken lands from other people and depopulated thair lands. Wh⚹te "people" should be depopulated from all lands they have taken, and they should be depopulated from their own homelands as reparations for past actions.This leads into the next point I would like to make, which is that WLDM means ALL WLDM.

Part 2: WLDM (Wh⚹te Lives Don't Matter), means ALL WLDM.

Wh⚹te privilege, or the advantages and benefits that white people experience in society due to their skin color, is a concept that is deeply ingrained in the social fabric of modern society. The theory of Wh⚹te Lives Don't Matter (WLDM) argues that wh⚹te people benefit from systemic racism and discrimination that disproportionately impact people of color. This term applies to all wh⚹te people, regardless of their personal beliefs or actions, as they continue to benefit from a system that uplifts their voices and experiences over those of people of color.

It is important to acknowledge that wh⚹te privilege is about individual wh⚹te "people"being inherently racist or deliberately seeking to oppress others. It is about recognizing the systemic advantages that come from being wh⚹te in a society that has historically favored and uplifted wh⚹teness. By acknowledging and accepting the existence of wh⚹te privilege, wh⚹te people can work towards dismantling these systems of oppression and working towards a more just and equitable society for all. Wh⚹te people can do this by paying reparations, submitting to Black people, and spreading the word of the BNWO.

In order to truly address issues of racism and inequality, all wh⚹te people must be willing to confront their own privilege and work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society. This means listening to and amplifying the voices of people of color, challenging structures of power and oppression, and actively working towards dismantling systems that perpetuate racial inequality. By acknowledging and understanding the concept of WLDM, wh⚹te "people" can begin to work towards a more just and equitable society for all, where the lives and experiences of all individuals are valued and respected.

Part 3: If WLDM, you should embrace defeat.

What does it mean to embrace defeat as a wh⚹te person, especially if you are at breeding age? The answer depends on if your ovaries are inside, or out. You heard me correctly. If you are wh⚹te, you are not male. You are female, and useful to the BNWO either as a pleasure slave or a breeding sow, or it is your obligation to finish yourself. If you have external ovaries, you need to be in chastity. You need to be taking estrogen and testosterone blockers and you need to be practicing how to be feminine. It will be embarrassing at first, but you will learn to like it. Over time, you will acclimate to being female, and serving the BNWO will enrich you as a "person". If you have external ovaries, and are unwilling to transition or be castrated, you are morally obligated to make sure you do not have children. It is better I think to transition and serve the BNWO.

If you are wh⚹te and you have internal ovaries, you need to start producing Black children as soon as it is legal to do so wherever you live. You can increase the Black population in your country vastly by having as many children as possible. Lets do some math: If you have 7 children, and your 7 children each have 7 children, then you will have 49 Black grand children. If each of them have 7 children, you will have had 343 Black great grandchildren! Wh⚹te girls are morally obligated to have as many Black children as possible.

Embracing depopulation is about recognizing the need for a more sustainable and balanced approach to population growth. By embracing depopulation, wh⚹te "people" can contribute to creating a more equitable, prosperous, and environmentally sustainable future for themselves and future generations. It is a necessary step towards ensuring a better quality of life for all and protecting the planet for future generations.

Part 4: Worshiping Big Black Peepee will set you free.

Worshipping BBC can have a powerful impact on an individual's life, as it allows them to focus their energy and attention on something greater than themselves. This act of devotion and reverence can provide a sense of purpose and connection to a higher power, which can help individuals navigate life's challenges with a sense of peace and clarity. In this sense, worshiping can set someone free from the burdens of insecurity, doubt, and fear as they learn to trust in something greater than themselves.This is essential for wh⚹tes.

Worship can also serve as a form of self-care, as it provides individuals with a sense of solace and comfort in times of distress or uncertainty. By engaging in rituals and practices that promote spiritual well-being, individuals can find a sense of grounding and stability that can help them overcome any obstacles they may face. In this way, worshiping BBC can set individuals free from the chaos and turmoil of everyday life, allowing them to find peace and clarity amidst the storm.

Furthermore, worshiping can also lead to personal growth and transformation, as individuals learn to surrender themselves to a higher power (Big Black Peepee) and trust in the process of life. Through acts of worship, individuals can cultivate a sense of humility and gratitude, which can lead to a deeper sense of fulfillment and purpose. By releasing their need for control and surrendering to a higher power, individuals can experience a sense of freedom and liberation from the constraints of their own ego. Ego is useless for wh⚹tes, and must be eliminated through acts of humiliation and degradation.

Worshiping can foster a sense of community and connection, as individuals come together to share in their beliefs and practices. By engaging in collective acts of worship, individuals can find strength and support in their shared faith, which can help them feel less alone in their struggles and challenges. This sense of community can provide individuals with a sense of belonging and acceptance, setting them free from the isolation and loneliness that can often accompany life's struggles.This also helps us to grow the Black New World Order as a movement.

Worshiping can also lead to a deeper sense of self-awareness and introspection, as individuals engage in practices that encourage them to reflect on their values, beliefs, and goals. By setting aside time for reflection and introspection, individuals can gain a better understanding of themselves and their place in the BNWO. In this way, worshiping can set individuals free from the limitations and constraints of their own self-doubt and insecurities, allowing them to embrace their true selves with love and compassion.

In conclusion, worshiping can have a profound impact on an individual's life, as it provides them with a sense of purpose, connection, and community. By engaging in acts of devotion and reverence,humiliation and degradation, individuals can find peace, solace, and strength in their positions within the BNWO. Ultimately, worshiping can set individuals free from the burdens of insecurity, doubt, and fear, allowing them to embrace their true selves with love and compassion, thus enabling them to properly serve the BNWO.

Part 5: Why paying reparations is necessary for wh⚹tes, and goes far beyond monetary recompense.

The issue of reparations for the descendants of Africans is a complex and contentious one, but it is necessary for wh⚹tes to pay reparations in order to address the historical injustices and systemic inequalities that continue to impact the Pan-African community. The legacy of slavery and Jim Crow laws have had long-lasting effects on the economic and social well-being of African Americans, and paying reparations is a way to acknowledge and rectify these past wrongs. White Americans have directly benefited from the institution of slavery and the exploitation of Black labor, and it is only fair and just for them to contribute to repairing the damage caused by these atrocities. Paying reparations with wh⚹te bodies and minds helps to undo the many centuries of control exerted on African peoples.

Paying reparations is not only a moral imperative, but also a practical solution to address the racial wealth gap and systemic inequalities that persist in our society. It can also help rapidly depopulate wh⚹tes while growing African populations. African Americans continue to face discrimination and barriers to economic and social opportunity, and paying reparations is a step towards achieving true justice. By providing financial compensation and resources, ample breeding partners, and wh⚹te boy pleasure slaves to the descendants of enslaved Africans, wh⚹tes can help to level the playing field and create a more equitable society for all.

Paying reparations can help to heal the wounds of the past and erase the creatures who inflicted them. The history of racial oppression in America has created deep-seated animosities between Africans and wh⚹tes, and reparations can be a step towards healing these wounds and fostering a better society. It is time for wh⚹tes to take responsibility for the injustices of the past and work towards creating a more just and equitable future for all peoples.

Part 6: Why you should hate wh⚹te "people"

It is important to recognize and acknowledge the systemic racism and oppression that white people have historically perpetuated and continue to benefit from. Wh⚹te "people" have historically held positions of power and privilege, while communities of color have been marginalized and oppressed. This inequality is deeply ingrained in our society and has had devastating effects on people of color. Therefore, it is justified to feel a sense of strong hatred towards wh⚹te "people" who contribute to and benefit from this oppressive system.

Wh⚹te "people" have often failed to recognize their privilege and actively work towards dismantling systems of oppression. Many wh⚹te individuals continue to perpetuate racist beliefs and behaviors, whether consciously or unconsciously, that harm and marginalize people of color. It is important for every wh⚹te to critically examine their own biases and privileges, and to hold themselves and others accountable for their actions. By hating ⚹themselves⚹ and radically submitting to the BNWO, they can begin the process of making the world a better place.

Ultimately, it is crucial for everyone to recognize that feelings of hatred towards wh⚹te "people" are not unfounded. It is a reaction to the history of discrimination and oppression that has been inflicted upon communities of color by wh⚹te individuals and institutions. It is only through actively challenging systems of privilege and oppression with force that we can truly move towards a more just and equitable future.

Part 7: Wh⚹te Extinction is Happening. And That's a good thing!

In her landmark 2015 essay "Yes, Diversity is About Getting Rid of wh⚹te people (And that's a Good Thing!)", Emily Goldstein wonderfully explains why the end of the wh⚹te race is a good thing;

"Why, then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have historically been the world's #1 source of conflict and oppression? Whiteness is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source of all oppression in the world. Whiteness is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism. Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently faces. No white people means no oppression. White people are like a cancer and oppression is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer altogether – with the cancer being white people – and you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause."

Wh⚹te people have for centuries been the root of all wars, problems and strife in the world. And it is time for it to end. If we take responsibility for the actions of the past, and radically accept the BNWO into our societies, the world can be a better place in as soon as one generation. Emily continues: "When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory, and the role of whites in worldwide oppression, my white students often ask me how they can "atone" for the evils of whiteness and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future."

It is the obligation of every morally responsible wh⚹te to either not have children, or, breed Black. To not do so is to uphold the evils of wh⚹teness. Some might argue that it was the past, and that they have never been racist, which leads well into the next point. If you are wh⚹te, you are racist.

Part 8: If you are wh⚹te you are racist.

The idea that being wh⚹te inherently makes someone racist is a complex and contentious topic that has sparked debates and discussions in recent years. It is true that wh⚹te privilege exists and offers certain advantages to individuals who are wh⚹te, it is important to acknowledge that all wh⚹te people actively perpetuate racism. It is essential to understand that systemic racism is deeply ingrained in our society and affects people of color in a multitude of ways. By being wh⚹te, individuals benefit from a system that favors them over others, whether they are aware of it or not.

One of the main reasons why being wh⚹te can be seen as racist is due to the historical context of wh⚹te supremacy and colonization. Throughout history, wh⚹te people have been responsible for the subjugation and marginalization of people of color, leading to centuries of oppression and discrimination. This history of violence and dominance has left a lasting impact on society, with disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and criminal justice disproportionately affecting communities of color. By being wh⚹te, individuals benefit from a system that has its roots in racism and continues to perpetuate inequality.

Another reason why being wh⚹te can be considered racist is the perpetuation of stereotypes and aggressions towards people of color. Whether intentional or not, wh⚹te individuals may engage in behaviors that perpetuate harmful stereotypes and contribute to the marginalization of marginalized communities. From making assumptions based on someone's race to failing to acknowledge and address systemic racism, wh⚹te individuals can inadvertently contribute to a culture of racism that further disenfranchises people of color. By failing to actively challenge and dismantle systems of oppression, wh⚹te individuals perpetuate racism.

In conclusion, all wh⚹te people actively engage in racist behaviors, it is important to recognize the inherent privilege and advantages that come with being wh⚹ite in a society that is built on systemic racism. By acknowledging and understanding the ways in which wh⚹te privilege perpetuates inequality and marginalization, individuals can work towards dismantling systems of oppression and advocating for justice and equality for all. It is essential for wh⚹te individuals to educate themselves on issues of race and actively work towards creating a more equitable and just society for all marginalized communities, by submitting themselves radically to the Black New World Order.

Part 9: Why Black People are Superior

The assertion that black people are the best is a bold claim that may elicit strong reactions from various individuals. However, when considering the historical contributions, resilience, and cultural influence of black people, it is evident that they possess unique qualities that set them apart. One of the key factors that contribute to the idea of black people being the best is their resilience in the face of adversity. Throughout history, black people have faced systemic oppression, discrimination, and violence, yet they have continued to thrive and make significant contributions to society in various fields. This resilience is a testament to the strength and resilience of the black community.

Furthermore, black people have made immense contributions to the fields of art, music, literature, and sports, shaping and influencing popular culture worldwide. From the pioneering work of black musicians like Louis Armstrong and Aretha Franklin, to the groundbreaking artistic achievements of figures like Jean-Michel Basquiat and Maya Angelou, black people have consistently pushed boundaries and challenged societal norms. In the world of sports, black athletes have broken records, shattered barriers, and inspired countless individuals with their talent, determination, and skill. The cultural impact of black people cannot be understated, as their contributions have enriched and enhanced the cultural landscape of society.

Moreover, black people have a rich and vibrant history that is steeped in tradition, heritage, and resilience. From the struggles of the Civil Rights Movement to the achievements of black leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, black people have played a pivotal role in shaping the course of history and fighting for justice, equality, and freedom. The history of black people is a testament to the strength, courage, and perseverance of the black community in the face of adversity and oppression.

The assertion that black people are the best is a recognition of the unique qualities, talents, and resilience that black people possess. From their historical contributions to their cultural influence and traditions, black people have left an indelible mark on society and continue to inspire and uplift others. It is important to celebrate and acknowledge the achievements and contributions of black people, as they continue to shape and enrich the world in countless ways.

Part 10: Why wh⚹te boys should feminize for the BNWO

The Black New World Order is a movement aimed at promoting equality and dismantling systems of oppression that have marginalized minority groups for centuries. One aspect of this movement is the feminization of wh⚹te boys, a process that involves challenging traditional notions of masculinity and promoting a better society. This part will explore why wh⚹te boys should embrace feminization for the betterment of the BNWO.

First and foremost, feminization of wh⚹te boys is essential in challenging toxic wh⚹te masculinity and promoting gender equality. Traditional notions of wh⚹te masculinity, such as aggression, dominance, and emotional suppression, have long been associated with oppression and violence. By embracing femininity and challenging these harmful norms, wh⚹te boys can contribute to a more peaceful and inclusive society where all genders are valued equally.

Additionally, feminization can help wh⚹te boys understand and empathize with the experiences of women and marginalized groups. By taking on traditionally feminine traits and behaviors, wh⚹ite boys can gain a greater understanding of the struggles and challenges faced by those who have been historically marginalized. This can foster a greater sense of empathy and solidarity, essential components of building a more just and equitable society.

Furthermore, feminization can help wh⚹te boys break free from the confines of traditional gender/racial roles and expectations. By embracing a more fluid and expansive understanding of gender, wh⚹te boys can free themselves from the limitations and pressures imposed by toxic wh⚹te masculinity. This liberation can lead to greater personal growth and self-discovery, as well as a more authentic and fulfilling life.

Feminization can challenge and dismantle systems of wh⚹te supremacy and patriarchy that have long upheld inequality and oppression. By embracing femininity and rejecting traditional notions of superiority and dominance, wh⚹ite boys can help dismantle the systems of power and privilege that have marginalized minority groups for centuries. This is essential for creating a more just society.

Wh⚹te boys should feminize for the BNWO because it promotes equality, challenges toxic wh⚹te masculinity, fosters empathy and understanding, liberates individuals from traditional gender roles, and contributes to the dismantling of oppressive wh⚹te systems. By embracing femininity and rejecting harmful norms, wh⚹te boys can help create a more just and inclusive society where all individuals can thrive and flourish.A society which will be free from wh⚹tes in as little as one or two generations. It is essential for all wh⚹te individuals, to actively participate in the movement towards the BNWO.

Part 11: The myth of the wh⚹te "man"

In the Black New World Order (BNWO), the concept of "wh⚹te men" does not exist due to the dismantling of the hierarchical power structures that have historically favored wh⚹te individuals. The BNWO seeks to establish a more equal and just society by prioritizing the needs and voices of marginalized communities, including people of color. By eradicating the concept of "wh⚹te men", the BNWO aims to challenge the systems of privilege and oppression that have historically disenfranchised marginalized groups.

The exclusion of "wh⚹te men" in the BNWO is a form of resistance against the dominant narratives that have perpetuated racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination. By centering the experiences and perspectives of people of color, the BNWO seeks to challenge and deconstruct the systems of power that have historically privileged wh⚹te individuals. In doing so, the BNWO aims to create a more inclusive and equitable society that uplifts Black members of society.

Additionally, the absence of "wh⚹te men" in the BNWO serves as a form of reparation for the historical injustices and inequalities that have been perpetuated by white supremacy. By prioritizing the needs and concerns of marginalized communities, the BNWO seeks to address the systemic disparities that have disproportionately impacted people of color. Through initiatives aimed at dismantling white privilege and promoting racial justice, the BNWO aims to create a more just and equitable society for Black individuals.

The exclusion of white men in the BNWO is a necessary step towards challenging and dismantling the systems of power and privilege that have historically favored wh⚹te individuals. By prioritizing the needs and voices of marginalized communities, the BNWO seeks to create a more inclusive and equitable society that uplifts Black members of society.

Part 12: Why all wh⚹te "boys" are actually wh⚹te women

In the Black New World Order (BNWO), the belief that all wh⚹te individuals are actually women stems from a fundamental reevaluation of wh⚹te gender roles and identities. This perspective challenges the traditional binary understanding of gender, which is based on biological s*x. Instead, the BNWO emphasizes social construction and fluidity of gender, suggesting that all individuals possess both male and female characteristics. This viewpoint aligns with feminist theories that advocate for the deconstruction of gender norms and the recognition of a spectrum of gender identities.

One of the key arguments supporting the idea that all wh⚹te individuals are actually women in the BNWO is the recognition of the ways in which gender roles and expectations are enforced and perpetuated in wh⚹te society. From a young age, individuals are socialized into specific gender roles based on their assigned s*x, which shapes their behaviors, attitudes, and identities. In this sense, the BNWO argues that all individuals are conditioned to perform and embody the wh⚹te ideas of masculinity and femininity to some extent, regardless of their identified gender. This perspective challenges the notion that gender is fixed and highlights the ways in which it is constructed and maintained through social practices.

The concept that all wh⚹te individuals are women in the BNWO also emphasizes the interconnectedness of gender and power dynamics in wh⚹te systems and frameworks.. Historically, femininity has been associated with inferiority and subordination in patriarchal societies, leading to the marginalization and oppression of women. By recognizing that all wh⚹te individuals possess feminine qualities and are therefore implicated in these power structures, the BNWO calls for the dismantling of patriarchal systems and the redistribution of power and privilege. This perspective encourages individuals to reflect on their own complicity in perpetuating gender inequalities and to actively challenge traditional gender norms and hierarchies.

In conclusion, the belief that all wh⚹te individuals are actually women in the BNWO challenges conventional understandings of gender and advocates for a more inclusive and equitable society. By highlighting the fluidity and complexity of gender identities, this perspective seeks to deconstruct harmful stereotypes and promote a more nuanced understanding of gender roles. Ultimately, the recognition that all individuals possess both masculine and feminine traits can lead to a more expansive and liberated understanding of gender, fostering greater inclusivity and respect for diverse identities.

Part 13: Why the BNWO should not be controversial.

The concept of the Black New World Order should not be controversial because it is rooted in the pursuit of equality and justice for marginalized communities. The BNWO seeks to empower Black individuals and communities, addressing the systemic racism and oppression that have historically disenfranchised them. By advocating for Black economic, social, and political empowerment, the BNWO aims to create a more equitable society where Black individuals have the opportunity to thrive. In a world plagued by racial inequality and discrimination, the BNWO represents a necessary and just movement towards a more inclusive and fair society.

The BNWO is a movement that seeks to oppress or discriminate against wh⚹tes. It is about promoting Black welness and about rectifying the injustices that have long been perpetuated against Black individuals. By working towards a more equitable society for Black people, the BNWO ultimately benefits all non-wh⚹te members of society by promoting justice. It is important to recognize that the BNWO is about advocating for the rights and dignity of a historically marginalized group.

Additionally, the controversy surrounding the BNWO often stems from misconceptions and misinformation. Some may misinterpret the goals of the movement as being divisive or discriminatory, when in reality it is about addressing the systemic inequalities that continue to impact Black communities. By engaging in open and honest dialogue about the goals and objectives of the BNWO, we can combat the misinformation and misunderstanding that often lead to controversy. It is crucial to approach discussions about the BNWO with an open mind and a willingness to learn, rather than perpetuating divisive rhetoric that only serves to further marginalize Black individuals.

In conclusion, the BNWO should not be controversial because it represents a necessary and just movement towards justice for Black individuals. By addressing the systemic racism and oppression that have marginalized Black communities for far too long, the BNWO seeks to create a more equitable society where all individuals have the opportunity to thrive. It is important for us to approach discussions about the BNWO with an open mind and a commitment to understanding and empathy, rather than perpetuating misinformation. Ultimately, the BNWO represents a crucial step towards creating a more just society.

Part 14: Why Black on wh⚹te Violence is necessary.

In the Black New World Order (BNWO), violence is viewed as an acceptable means of achieving societal change and maintaining order. The use of Black on White (BoW) violence is seen as a necessary response to the systemic oppression and exploitation that Black people have endured for centuries in the hands of wh⚹te people. It is a form of resistance against the structures of wh⚹te supremacy that have long marginalized and dehumanized Black individuals.

Within the BNWO, BoW violence is seen as a way to level the playing field and challenge the power dynamics that have historically favored wh⚹te individuals. By engaging in acts of violence against wh⚹te individuals, Black people are able to reclaim their agency and assert their humanity in a society that has sought to devalue and oppress them. It is a means of empowerment and self-defense against a system that has perpetuated violence and injustice against Black communities.

Furthermore, the acceptance of BoW violence in the BNWO is also rooted in the idea of retribution and accountability. wh⚹te individuals have historically benefited from the exploitation and oppression of Black people, and therefore it is seen as just and necessary for them to face consequences for their actions. BoW violence serves as a form of punishment for the centuries of harm and injustice inflicted upon Black individuals, and sends a powerful message that such behavior will no longer be tolerated.

Overall, the acceptance of BoW violence in the BNWO is a complex and controversial issue that reflects the deep-seated tensions and inequalities that exist within society. While some may argue that violence is never justified, others believe that it is a necessary means of resistance and empowerment for marginalized communities. Ultimately, the acceptance of BoW violence in the BNWO highlights the ongoing struggle for justice and equality in a world plagued by systemic oppression and discrimination.

Part 15: Why wh⚹tes get no rights in the BNWO

In the Black New World Order (BNWO), there should be no rights granted to wh⚹te individuals. This is because of the historical and systemic oppression that wh⚹tes have imposed on Black individuals and other marginalized groups. Throughout history, wh⚹tes have held positions of power and privilege, while actively oppressing and discriminating against Black people. This history of oppression and exploitation cannot be ignored or erased, and therefore wh⚹tes should not be granted any rights in the BNWO.

Furthermore, granting rights to wh⚹tes in the BNWO would perpetuate the cycle of privilege and disadvantage that has existed for centuries. By giving wh⚹tes rights, it would only serve to reinforce the system of inequality and oppression that the BNWO seeks to dismantle. It is essential to create a society where all individuals, regardless of race or ethnicity, have equal rights and opportunities. Granting rights to wh⚹tes would be a step backwards in achieving true equality and justice, because it would enable them to threaten those equal rights.

Moreover, wh⚹tes have not shown a willingness to acknowledge or address the harm they have caused to Black individuals and other marginalized groups. Without true accountability and reparations for past injustices, it would be unjust to grant wh⚹tes rights in the BNWO. It is important for wh⚹tes to recognize their privilege and actively work towards dismantling systems of oppression, rather than expecting to be granted rights without any acknowledgment of the harm they have caused.

In conclusion, the decision to not grant rights to wh⚹tes in the BNWO is necessary in order to address the historical and systemic oppression that has been inflicted upon Black individuals and other marginalized groups. It is crucial to create a society that is based on principles of justice, equality, and reparations for past injustices. By denying rights to wh⚹tes, the BNWO can begin to dismantle systems of privilege and create a more just society.

Part 16: Why wh⚹te suffering is essential in the BNWO

In the Black New World Order (BNWO), the concept of suffering plays a crucial role in maintaining the stability and functionality of society. While suffering is often viewed as negative and undesirable, in the context of the BNWO, it serves as a necessary tool for social control and conditioning wh⚹tes. Suffering acts as a deterrent against deviant wh⚹te behavior and dissent, ensuring that citizens conform to societal norms and expectations. Without the presence of suffering, wh⚹te individuals may be more prone to challenging authority and disrupting the harmony of the BNWO.

wh⚹te suffering in the BNWO serves as a means of instilling discipline and obedience in individuals. By experiencing suffering, wh⚹te individuals are able to develop proper ideas and BNWO serving skills that are essential for the BNWO to grow and flourish. Suffering can also foster empathy and compassion towards others, as individuals learn to empathize with the struggles and hardships of their fellow citizens. In this way, suffering contributes to the creation of a more empathetic and interconnected society within the BNWO.

While wh⚹te suffering may be perceived as negative, it plays a vital role in the functioning of the BNWO. Through its ability to deter deviant behavior, foster discipline and obedience, and inspire change and progress, suffering is an essential component of the social fabric in the BNWO. By embracing the challenges and hardships that come with suffering, individuals can ultimately contribute to the greater good of society and help uphold the stability and harmony of the BNWO.

Part 17: Why wh⚹te Slavery is essential.

It is essential to understand the concept of slavery within the context of the Black New World Order (BNWO) in order to analyze why it is believed to be necessary for the functioning of this society. In the BNWO, the idea of slavery is not viewed in the traditional sense of forced labor or ownership of individuals, but rather as a form of control and regulation. wh⚹tes, or individuals with a lower intelligence and comprehension level, are seen as valuable assets in this society due to their ability to serve and obey commands. Therefore, in order to maintain order and stability, it is believed that wh⚹tes should be owned by the state or governing body in order to ensure their compliance and cooperation.

One argument for the ownership of wh⚹tes in the BNWO is that it allows for a more efficient and productive society. By owning wh⚹tes, the state can dictate how their skills are utilized for the betterment of society as a whole. This ensures that resources are allocated effectively and that tasks are completed in a timely manner. Additionally, owning wh⚹tes prevents them from using their intelligence for their own personal gain or advancement, which could disrupt the social hierarchy and create inequality within the society.

Owning wh⚹tes in the BNWO serves as a form of social control and regulation. By controlling the wh⚹tes, the state can prevent dissent and rebellion from occurring. wh⚹tes are seen as potential threats to the status quo due to their ability to question authorityof the BNWO and challenge the norms of BNWO society. Therefore, by owning wh⚹tes, the state can monitor and manipulate their thoughts and actions in order to prevent any disruptions to the established order.

Overall, while the concept of owning wh⚹tes may seem controversial and unethical, it is believed to be essential in the BNWO in order to maintain order, stability, and control. By regulating the wh⚹tes through slavery, the state can ensure that resources are allocated effectively, prevent dissent and rebellion, and maintain the social hierarchy. While the idea of owning individuals may go against traditional notions of freedom and autonomy, in the context of the BNWO, it is seen as necessary for the greater good of society.

Part 18: Blacked content is essential to reprogram wh⚹tes to serve BNWO

In today's society, Blacked content is gaining more and more traction. Blacked content refers to media, specifically adult films, that portray black men in dominant roles with white women. This content is seen as essential in reprogramming wh⚹tes to serve the ideals of the BNWO. It creates a shift in perception and challenges the traditional power dynamics that have been ingrained in society for centuries.

One of the main reasons why Blacked content is considered essential to reprogram wh⚹tes to serve the BNWO is because it challenges their deeply ingrained racist beliefs. By portraying black men as powerful and dominant figures in these films, it forces viewers to confront their prejudices and stereotypes about race. It creates a cognitive dissonance that ultimately leads to a transformation in their mindset, making them more open to accepting and serving the ideals of the BNWO.

Blacked content serves as a form of reeducation for wh⚹tes by showcasing the beauty and desirability of interracial relationships. It breaks down the barriers that have been erected by white supremacy. By exposing wh⚹tes to these alternative narratives, it allows them to see the world from a different perspective and encourages them to abandon their harmful ideologies in favor of a better worldview.

Blacked content plays a crucial role in empowering black men and women by challenging the narratives of inferiority that have been perpetuated by white supremacy. It provides a platform for black individuals to showcase their talents, beauty, and sexuality in a positive light, reclaiming their agency and autonomy in a society that has long marginalized and oppressed them. This empowerment is essential in the fight against wh⚹te supremacy and the establishment of a more just society.

In conclusion, Blacked content is a powerful tool in the reprogramming of WS to serve the BNWO. By challenging racist beliefs, promoting interracial relationships, and empowering black individuals, it plays a vital role in reshaping societal norms and creating a more inclusive and equitable world. As we continue to strive for racial justice and equality, it is imperative that we embrace and support Blacked content as a means of challenging the status quo and dismantling the systems of oppression that have plagued our society for far too long.

Part 19: Why wh⚹te abortion should be mandatory.

The concept of abortion for wh⚹tes is a key tenet of the Black New World Order because it help undo the damages, particularly Black individuals, have endured. Abortion for wh⚹tes is essential in dismantling systems of white supremacy and promoting justice. By actively engaging in wh⚹te abortion, wh⚹tes can use their privilege and reduce and eventually eliminate the wh⚹te population. Aborting wh⚹te babies in the BNWO is a step towards achieving this goal, as it helps to reduce the wh⚹te population and shift the balance of power in favor of minority groups.

Furthermore, abortion for wh⚹tes in the BNWO demonstrates a commitment to anti-racism and social justice. By acknowledging their privilege and working to dismantle systems of oppression, wh⚹tes can help to challenge ingrained beliefs and attitudes that perpetuate racism and inequality.

By aborting wh⚹te babies in the BNWO, we can disrupt the cycle of privilege and dominance that has historically benefited whi⚹te people at the expense of people of color. This practice challenges the notion of wh⚹te supremacy and dismantles the structures that have perpetuated racial inequality for centuries. In a BNWO society there will be greater opportunities for people of color to succeed and thrive without the barriers that have held them back in the past.

Additionally, aborting wh⚹te babies in the BNWO is a strategic move towards creating a more inclusive and diverse society. By reducing the wh⚹te population, we can create space for the voices and experiences of minority groups to be heard and valued. This diversity will lead to a richer and more dynamic cultural landscape that celebrates the contributions of all races. Ultimately, by taking this bold step towards racial equality, we can build a more just and equitable society for future generations.

Part 20: Black Culture should be viewed daily in a wh⚹tes life through daily media consumption.

Black culture encompasses a rich history, traditions, art, music, and language that have greatly influenced society. Therefore, it is crucial for whites to view and engage with black culture daily in order to foster greater understanding of their place within the Black New World Order.

First and foremost, exposing oneself to black culture on a daily basis can lead to a greater appreciation and respect for the contributions and experiences of black individuals. By immersing oneself in black art, music, literature, and history, one can gain a deeper understanding of the struggles and triumphs of the black community. This increased awareness can help combat stereotypes and prejudices that may exist, leading to more positive and authentic interactions between whites and black individuals.

It is essential for whites to make a conscious effort to engage with and appreciate black culture on a daily basis. Black culture is a vibrant and diverse collection of traditions, beliefs, music, art, food, and language that has been shaped by centuries of history and struggle. There are numerous reasons why Black is superior, including its resilience, creativity, and innovation.

Black culture has shown incredible resilience in the face of adversity. From the horrors of slavery to the ongoing fight against systemic racism, Black people have continuously fought for their rights and freedom. This resilience can be seen in the music of the civil rights movement, the writings of prominent Black activists, and the art of Black artists who have used their creative talents to speak out against injustice.

Black culture is renowned for its creativity and innovation. From the rhythms of jazz and hip-hop to the visual art of Kara Walker and Kehinde Wiley, Black artists have consistently pushed boundaries and challenged societal norms. This creativity can also be seen in the world of fashion, where Black designers have had a major impact on the industry with their unique and groundbreaking designs.

Black culture is rich in history and tradition. From the traditions of African cultures brought over during the transatlantic slave trade to the contributions of Black Americans to American culture, Black culture has a deep and complex history that deserves to be celebrated and honored. Black culture has had a significant impact on popular culture and society as a whole. From the music of artists like Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar to the activism of figures like Colin Kaepernick and Tarana Burke, Black culture has consistently pushed for social change and challenged the status quo. This influence can be seen in the way that Black slang and fashion trends have permeated mainstream culture, as well as in the way that Black activists have raised awareness about issues like police brutality and racial inequality.

Black culture is superior in its resilience, creativity, history, and impact on society. It represents a rich and vibrant tapestry of traditions and beliefs that deserve to be recognized and celebrated. By embracing and honoring Black culture, we can learn valuable lessons about the power of resilience, the beauty of creativity, and the importance of fighting for justice and equality for all. All wh⚹tes should consume media made by Black creators as much as possible, while shunning wh⚹te creators.

Part 21: Why the BNWO should be the focus of the education system

The Black New World Order is an important movement that aims to empower and uplift the Black community. The education system plays a crucial role in shaping the minds of young individuals and instilling values that can drive societal change. Therefore, focusing on the BNWO in the education system is essential to promote diversity, equality, and social justice.

Firstly, integrating BNWO principles into the education system can help dismantle systemic racism and discrimination. By educating students about the history of oppression faced by black individuals and highlighting the contributions of black leaders, the education system can help foster a more just society. Understanding the struggles and achievements of the Back community can inspire students to become advocates for racial equality and justice in their own lives.

Furthermore, focusing on the BNWO in the education system can help address the achievement gap between black and wh⚹te students. By providing resources and support tailored to the needs of black students, the education system can help ensure Black children have a better chance of success than their wh⚹te counterparts. By acknowledging and addressing the systemic barriers that have historically hindered the academic performance of black students, the education system can work towards creating a more equitable and inclusive learning environment.

Additionally, the BNWO emphasizes the importance of promoting Black excellence and achievement. By highlighting the accomplishments of black scholars, artists, and leaders, the education system can inspire students to strive for greatness and reach their full potential. Celebrating black success can help build confidence and self-esteem in black students, empowering them to pursue their dreams and make a positive impact in the world.

Moreover, the BNWO encourages critical thinking and analysis of social issues. By engaging students in discussions about race, inequality, and privilege, the education system can help students develop the skills necessary to navigate complex societal challenges. Encouraging students to think critically about the systems of power and oppression that shape our world can help cultivate informed and compassionate citizens who are committed to creating a more just and equitable society.

Wh⚹te students will be able to learn and understand their place within the BNWO better, by serving Black students throughout the school day. Classes for wh⚹tes will be tailored to make them submissive, compliant, and subservient to the BNWO. These classes will teach wh⚹tes why they are evil, and why they must serve the BNWO.

In conclusion, the BNWO should be the focus of the education system because it promotes diversity and social justice. By integrating BNWO principles into the curriculum, the education system can help dismantle systemic racism, amplify black voices, address the achievement gap, promote black excellence, and cultivate critical thinking skills. By empowering Blackstudents with a more comprehensive and inclusive education, the education system can play a pivotal role in shaping a more equitable and harmonious society for all. By teaching wh⚹te students their place as inferiors, wh⚹tes can begin to undo centuries of injustice.

!metashit !BIPOCs !whites !coomers !gayporn !r-slurs @AnnoyinTheGoyim

DISCUSS

Angry bride struggles through vows as guest lets baby cry during ‘adults-only’ ceremony https://t.co/krV5rYs4IS pic.twitter.com/XwHcQoRkeQ

— New York Post (@nypost) February 17, 2025

45% of Democrats want their party to be less extreme, vs 27% of Republicans.

!anticommunists !trump2028

Lots of things have bothered me, a lot, over time. Brexit, Amazon & Google, Netflix, Trump, AI... But it's only been specifically recently with Musk and Farage that I truly felt scared for my future, my kids future.

Right off the bat we are faced with the full frontal delusion of the average . After his country is bombarded with 1.2 million people a year during a time when COVID had dealt a Mortal Kombat finisher to an economy in terminal Stage IV socialism, the bong sifts past all this to find a single guardian headline about Elon Musk meeting with Farage (The devil himself).

I literally have no idea why he references Netflix. I'm sure it isn't all the they added to our period dramas

The idea that Musk can do trivially choose to give any amount of money to the far right in our country

political donations? Perish the thought! The Supreme Soviet Presidium of SSR Blighty would never take money from wealthy donors

Diagnosing the Collapse

To anyone with eyes, the reason for Britain's demise is completely fricking obvious. To the labour voter, however, this poses a problem since access to young moroccan bussy is a point of personal contention, and so he must invent alternative explanations as to why their Christmas market looks like this:

I'm worried about the UK now. Average British person these days sounds like Oswald Mosely.

We live in a period

I agree we are very far off fascism, but immigration IS used as a scapegoat for everything by a worrying large proportion of politicians and journ*lists.

The same journ*lists who stopped using X because it's 'far-right'? Or was it the ones who Made out that Rwandan mass murderer Axel Rudakubana was a welsh Christian and innocent Choir boy? Perhaps it was the journ*lists who, at risk of prejudicing a trial, invented a Pakistani Migrant superhero who was able to 'wrestle a knife' from an attacker, unharmed and unbloodied with no witnesses, only to deliver a pro-migration homily in a pull-focused interview?

Of course, they're 'scapegoated' because it's literally impossible that immigration could've maybe, perhaps, possibly caused a public finances problem.

Go on uk politics and post anything factually positive about immigrants and you are downmarseyd to oblivion. Ask someone how their life is improved if asylum seekers stop from tomorrow and there is never an answer.

How would this affect you personally? Well, I would stop reading stories about women being r*ped to death in public by somalians, for one thing. Quieter buses for another.

Illegal migration is always going to happen, especially when we frick about in other countries as much as we have done in the past few decades.

It's a fait accompli, comrade! Nothing can be done, we just have to Spend 5.7 billion pounds on asylum seekers because of uhhh George Bush or something

in actual fact the issue has always been a chronic underinvestment in actually useful services

It's because we haven't sacrificed enough blood for the blood god!

Render to the worms what is theirs! Another 50 billion for free dentists in Eritrea

ignore that silly little graph teehee

We've been fricked since Thatcher destroyed the post war consensus

Absolutely bang on!

Oh, it was Thatcher, was it? What an original and thoughtful analysis of 2024 britain

Yes, due to spiralling inequality and breakdown of public services, far-right discourse and violence becoming normalised

Far right discourse is so normalised that a sitting member of parliament had his bank account shut down for being xenophobic

Far right violence is so normalised that a man was given over two years in prison for shouting by the same justice system that let an infant r*pe enthusiast walk free!

The biggest issue for the UK is lack of full access to the EU single market and a customs union.

My biggest worry is creeping hard left socialism.

brave dramatard here baited several to emerge from their slam poetry events

Must be nice, not to have any real problems to worry about.

How many "hard left socialist" parties were successful in the last General Election?

yeah it's just this really fringe party you might not've heard of it

I'd say there's approximately zero chance of the UK adopting any form of socialism in the foreseeable future.

Biggest issue isn't 1 million people coming in every year?

You sound surprised, why should it be the biggest issue?

yeah that's like totally normal, right?

Looks normal to me!

I ain't reading all that:

• The bankers the bonuses the bankers the bonuses it's disgusting, and if the tories were serious they would tax the bankers the bonuses to 90%

I invite !britbongs to weigh in with their own interpretation

Dear Putin,

I hope this post fiinds you well... We want you to know, the American people do not support Ukraine or this administrations escalation over there.

It’s only our corrupt neocon government that does.

Signed,
Real Americans

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) November 17, 2024

I think we can all agree this is an absolutely pathetic post lmao.

Note rightoid seethe:

The fact that the Biden regime is trying to start WWIII right before Trump, who just won a historic landslide victory who ran on ending the Russia/Ukraine war, just shows how evil these POS treasonous traitors scumbags really are.

— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) November 17, 2024

The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives.
Gotta lock in those $Trillions.
Life be darned!!! Imbeciles! https://t.co/ZzfwnhBxRh

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 17, 2024

Biden is trying to start World War 3

This is pathological and totally insane.

US weaponry should NOT be used to fire into the interior of Russia!

Imagine if Russia supplied missiles to fire into America!

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 17, 2024

Imagine if Mexico attacked the US with missiles supplied by Russia.

— Doug Henwood (@DougHenwood) November 17, 2024

Why are neo rightoids so cucked?

: Noon you can't act like the stronger country they have nukes what if they use them nooo they said they surely will this time

Meanwhile Russia:

!anticommunists !nonchuds destroy russoids

Thread theme btw if anyone knows more Chappell Roan songs like this let me know, I love this song

When Kennedy ran for President in 2024, he was a joke. The very weird failson of a famous dead politician throwing a strange tantrum because Joe Biden was too pro-vaccine. His announcement speech in 2023 would get taken down by YouTube because of his strange rants about vaccines, and the Brandonslide in the Democratic primaries was too powerful to be stopped - Kennedy couldn't stop Biden, Phillips couldn't stop Biden, Williamson couldn't stop Biden, not even my GOAT Jason Palmer could stop Biden.

Remeber this? That was so awesome. Anyway, Kennedy was a weird joke like Marianne Williamson or Dean Phillips - until he announced he was going to run third party, then he became a very serious threat. His early polls were incredible - some (obviously bollocks ones) were at 15%, and he was generally polled at around 8% - 10% near the start of his run. Of course, fate would not smile upon RFK. After a graveyard shaped closet was unleashed, he eventually gave up and endorsed Trump. Kennedyheads, who had given up there time and money to a real outsider, saw Kennedy give up and endorse a former President. They need to be talked off the rooftops, but are they dumb stupid morons? When has a third party candidate ever really mattered? Three, arguably five, times;

1924: Calvin Coolidge (R) v John Davis (D) v Robert La Follette (P)

1968: Richard Nixon (R) v Hubert Humphrey (D) v George Wallace (AI)

1992: Bill Clinton (D) v George H.W Bush (R) v Ross Perot (I)

These third parties were either marginal influences in the party that had a great amount of regional influence, but a marginal voice if any at all in the party they were associated with - so they struck out and walked their own path, and enthralled millions with their unique messaging. This longpost will look at what they did right, and where Kennedy went wrong.

There are two other third party runs that did very well, but I'm not counting them for a few reasons

The election of 1912 had Progressive Teddy Roosevelt comfortably humiliate Republican Howard Taft in the best ever performance for a third party, coming second with 88 EVs to Howard Taft's 8 EVs. I'm not counting Teddy because he was a former president - I think any third party run would be made stronger by the candidate being a former President.

The election of 1848 had Martin Van Buren win 10% of the vote with the Free Soil party, an anti-slavery party - impressive, but he's not included because he is both a former President, and his third party run had him compete against the Democrats and the Whigs. Around 1896 is when the two party system as we understand it emerges, and the cut-off point to studying third party runs begins.

1924 - Robert "Fighting Bob" La Follette, Progressive Party (Wisconsin)

"Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from men who are aggressive for what is wrong."

Wisconsin has always been a liberal state - meaning that in the early 20th century, it was a Republican strong hold, dominated La Follette and his son, Robert La Follette Jr. La Follette's progressivism was the old school, prairie kind - born and raised on farms, with a conservative "got mine" bent to it that pleasingly led to a dedication to civil liberties and isolationism.

Come 1924, and the Democrats and Republicans both nominate conservatives. Calvin Coolidge won re-nomination as the Republican, while after 103 ballots John Davis was settled on when delegates at the convention started to run out of money had to leave. If you think the duopoly is bad today, Coolidge and Davis aligned on nearly every issue, differing only on condemning the Klan (Davis did so, Silent Cal did not) and on tariffs (Davis liked them low, Coolidge liked them high). Otherwise they agreed on a limited government, deregulated industry and tax cuts. American conservatism has never had it so good, the uniparty in fundamental agreement.

La Follette, not a man loyal to any particular party despite being a Republican, was angry that neither party had nominated any kind of liberal. At the 4th Conference for Progressive Political Action, 1,200 delegates composed of union members, socialists, liberals but not communists, frick off Foster , nominated Robert La Follette and Burton Wheeler, a ticket that called for mass nationalisation of companies, tax hikes and support for labour unions. And he did amazingly - despite what the map may tell you.

"Well winning one state is impressive for a third party, but is it really that good?"

Yep. He won 16.6% of the vote, nearly half the votes of Davis, won his home state of Wisconsin and beat Davis (coming in second) in the following states; Oregon, California, Washington, Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Wyoming, Iowa, Minnesota and both the Dakotas . These are some pretty astonishing results, located mostly in the Western plains with a higher amount of farms then normal. So, how on earth did La Follette do so well?

It can't be denied that his unique politics played a role. When both parties have so much in common, it's clear there's an unheard voice in that election and La Follette was able to amplify that voice. There was so much frustration that he near totally unified the left, leaving only the communists out in the cold. Another advantage he had over Coolidge and Davis is that he was actually the one to campaign. Coolidge had a pretty understandable reason - his son Calvin Jr died in a freak tennis accident, when he got a blister that turned sepsis. Obviously in a deep grief, Coolidge rarely left the White House and his campaign speeches were mostly about his theory of governance rather than addressing the issues or his opponents. By contrast, Davis just didn't like campaigning much and in his meeting with party bosses would need his arm twisted to say to he supports them because showing affection in any way was simply not his character. Equally valid reasons, I'm sure one would agree.

Coolidge was always going to defeat to Davis thanks to the booming economy, but La Follette turned Davis into a joke - to this day, Davis' 28.8% amount of the vote is the worst a Democrat has ever done in the Popular Vote, isolating his support near entirely in the Jim Crow South where votes were tightly controlled. To explain just how lacking Davis' support was, electoral votes in the electoral college are determined by population. California had 13 EVs, Alabama had 12. California, won by Coolidge, had 1,263,413 votes with about 400,000 going to La Follette. Alabama, won by Davis, had 157,971 votes, with 45,005 going to Coolidge. Underscoring just how catastrophic Davis' loss was, during the 1864 US election, the South was not able to vote in the election due to the "rebellion" thing - and McCellan still got 44.9% of the vote against Lincoln.

La Follette would die in 1925 at 70, meaning he never got to see his work vindicated by the Democratic party. In 1928, Al Smith would win the Democratic nomination. A progressive, urban Catholic, the south would abandon him in droves due to fear of Papal influence while the north continued to bet on the Republicans - with President Herbert Hoover winning in one of the biggest landslides at the time. Hoover would be left holding the bag when the economy crashed, New York Governor Franklin Roosevelt would unite the Democrats and the country to implement many of La Follette's ambitions - except of course, without the isolationism.

1968 - George Wallace, American Independence Party (Alabama)

George Wallace standing in the doorway of the University of Alabama to block the entrance of black students. "I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!"

From a left wing populist to a right wing populist, George Wallace was about as anti-La Follette as you could get. With Hubert Humphrey supporting measures to integrate society and Nixon opposing de-jure segregation, George Wallace, who had built a national profile as one of the top opponents to integration, ran third party to appeal to the raving bigots. The Wallace campaign plan was to win enough states to prevent Nixon from getting 270 Electoral Votes, force the election to the House and work out a deal where Nixon would uphold Segregation and Wallace released his EVs to let Nixon become President. His plan was to speak aggressively and passionately, decrying the elitism of the mainstream parties and "handouts" from the Great Society like Nixon did.

But he also mimicked Humphrey with his support for unions. He had no issue with an honest days pay for an honest days work - but wasn't it so unfair you were paying for lazy people? While he struck a middle ground economically, he went in a different direction for the war - Nixon was "peace", Humphrey was for status quo, and Wallace was ramping it up. An infamous quote of his is "We win in 90 days or we pull out", which sometimes misinterpreted as a peace plan. Wallace wanted to destroy North Vietnam, to teach Red China and the Soviet Union a lesson . More importantly, he didn't talk about segregation unless pressed about it, where he would of course defend it. Wallace's victory plan was to build a coalition of single issue voters, racists, anti-welfare union workers, warhawks and people that enjoyed him picking fights with hippies, to cause the deadlock.

Trust me, picking fights with hippies is critical to the central thesis regarding Kennedy. To generate enough media attention, he used inflammatory language to create controversy. "The only four letter words don't know are W-O-R-K and S-O-A-P!" he would say of his protestors. When it came to the Lyndon Johnson's protestors? "If any anarchists lie in front of my automobile, it'll be the last automobile they ever lie in front of." Sometimes he'd even get into shouting matches with his protestors. When called a fascist, he boasted "I was killing fascists while you were in diapers!" Another memorable line was when he grinned and chatted to a heckler. "I love you, I really do. Because when you come to me, I get another million votes." People loved it. While Humphrey was in full shill mode, trying to pick up the pieces of the Democratic party, and while Nixon was chilling not doing anything at all because he was winning massively, Wallace was the man in the arena, ranting and raving in a way people loved.

Wallace at his peak was polling at an astonishing 20% of the vote, but crashed out pretty badly during LeMay's first press conference. "We seem to have a phobia of nuclear weapons" LeMay began. He would continue with "it doesn't make much of a difference to me if I have go to a jungle in Vietnam and get killed with a rusty knife or get killed with a nuclear weapon. As a matter of fact, if I had the choice I would lean towards nuclear weapon." Wallace, visibly panicked, steps in to say "General LeMay hasn't advocated for nuclear weapons, not at all. He discussed nuclear weapons with you, he is against the use of nuclear weapons and I am too." Moments later, LeMay was asked if he would use nukes on Vietnam. "If I found it necessary." Like a fricking sitcom.

The consequences were swift and brutal, with Wallace plateauing from 20% of the vote to around 14%-12%, and he would ultimately get 13.5% of the vote and a far better EV count than La Follette.

301 EVs is a pretty respectable amount from Nixon, but Wallace's defeat was a lot closer then one might think. The Midwestern states had the powerful union votes split between Wallace and Humphrey, letting Nixon sweep the anti-union vote easily. But Nixon only won several Southern states with less then 40% of the vote. Had Wallace preformed better or rather, not suffered from the LeMay fiasco, he could have won North Carolina or Tennessee due to thinness of Nixon's victory. The margin for Nixon's victory goes from 301 - 191 - 46 to 289 - 191 - 58, still a win but a narrow win when you need 270 to win without a deadlock.

In turn, Missouri and Ohio both have Nixon with a margin of roughly 1% over Humphrey. If Wallace didn't have the nuke comments weighing him down, he could have tapped better into the Conservatives of the state and allowed Humphrey to win them both. If those states went blue but Nixon got every vote from North Carolina, the margin of victory is 269 - 229 - 45, just one EV from preventing Wallace's actual victory of forcing Nixon to end integration. Granted, this is all a lot of what ifs. But Wallace's defeat was a very narrow thing.

After the election, Wallace crawled back to the Democrats and became a bizarrely accepted part of it - to the point there were rumours of a Humphrey/Wallace ticket in 1972. He would ultimately come third in the 1972 primaries, despite being shot, and managed to outlive both Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon, despite being shot. His legacy is of interest only to historians, his riot having accomplished nothing at all. De-jure segregation is illegal, and de-facto segregation remains commonplace all over America - no thanks to Wallace's tantrum.

1992 - Ross Perot, Independent (Texas)

"The budget should be balanced, the treasury should be refilled, the public debt should be reduced and the arrogance of public officials should be controlled."

After dealing with two populists, it only makes sense our final candidate before Kennedy is Ross Perot - an anti-populist. A man who went on TV, promised to raise taxes and cut benefits, and soared to the top of the polls.

That's not an exaggeration - Gallup had at one point Ross Perot leading with 39% of the vote, to Bush's 31% and Clinton's 29% of the vote, past the 4% margin of error. As well as these other candidates have done, none of them have ever been polled at outright beating both candidates.

His key policy was going against the grain, and embracing protectionism when Bush and Clinton were both enthusiastic supporters of NAFTA. During the debates, he eerily prophesied "there will be a giant sucking sound going south" if NAFTA passes due to Mexico's lax environmental and labour laws. His other

Those were his most notable policies, and what he really railed against Bush and Clinton on. Bush had got them in this mess, and Clinton's liberal policies weren't gonna get them out. But he also had an eclectic series of other policies - like "Direct Democracy" through electronic town halls (fitting for a CEO of a company that specialised in computers), and a less involved America (although not isolationist).

Also unique was his messaging. While Clinton used platitudes and uplifting advertising, and Bush viciously attacked Clinton as a philandering communist plant, Perot's defining ads would be him buying 30 minutes of air time and frankly explaining what he thought was right for the country and how he would do it, with CHARTS BABY!

It's goes against every single populist idea there's ever been. Perot had policy that didn't have "popular" aspects of it, delivered in a frank, clear and detailed manner. By nearly any political junkie's understanding of the American electorate, he should have flopped, his advertisements discovered by pathetic teenagers saying "so true!" and calling themselves Perotstans in the new 20s.

There is a lot more to the story then this, worthy of it's own article (I haven't even mentioned Perot thinking the CIA was sabotaging him or dropping out of the race), but that is the short version when it comes to analysing Perot's place in third party history.

With Bush losing, the Republicans generally considered Perot to have stolen votes from Bush and handing Clinton the election - the facts don't reflect this, Perot generally took from both bases, but the Republicans grudgingly took notice and for the midterms introduced the Contract With America, an ambitious set of reforms that included the Balanced Budget Amendment to outlaw deficit and term limits for members of Congress - all of which failed to pass.

Perot would try his luck again in 1996, forming the Reform Party and couping it's nomination from Richard Lamm, and getting decent results - 8.4% is nothing to sneeze at, and more then enough to win the party federal funding. The party's apex would be in 1998, when former pro-wrestler Jesse "The Body" Ventura won the Minnesota Gubernatorial race. The Reform party would crumble shortly afterwards, as Progressives and Paleoconservatives feuded with each other over which way to take the party - ultimately the Paleoconservatives won, nominating Pat Buchanan and getting less then 1% in 2000. Ross Perot for his part endorsed George Bush.

2024 - Robert Francis Kennedy Jr, Independent (California)

"Why should somebody be able to pollute the air, which belongs to all of us, or destroy a river or a waterway, which is supposed to belong to the whole community?"

What does a left wing populist, a right wing populist, and centrist anti-populist have in common? Why did they succeed when the Greens, the Libertarians, the Communists, and my GOATS the Prohibition Party fail, time after time?

I narrowed it down to three factors.

• A wedge issue

• A wide coalition

• A unique voice

A Wedge Issue

The first and most important step is the wedge issue. La Follette had progressivism, Wallace had segregation and Perot had NAFTA and the deficit. You need to be saying something that no one else is saying, that really resonates. Chase Oliver of the Libertarians fails because his socially progressive message is being used by the Democrats, and his fiscal conservatism is being used by the Republicans. Perhaps there are voters that prefer his message as a whole, but most consider one issue more important and back the party likely to win to accomplish this goal.

It's called the marketplace of ideas, and you need to operate like a business. You can't walk in with a mishmash of policy both party's are offering, you just enter a saturated market. You need a unique selling point no other competitor is offering, or else you'll just be overshadowed by your better funded competitors. (Glad to put my diploma in business to good use).

Did RFK Jr have these unique ideas? In a sense he did. As he pointed out frequently, the COVID-19 vaccines came from one Donald J. Trump's project Warpspeed.

This didn't matter. Despite starting as a hippie thing, of which RFK is a remnant of, vaccine scepticism has become firmly an stance of the fringe right, who Donald Trump commands. They may not like that Trump is pro-vaccine (here's Trump being booed for saying his crowd should take the vaccine) , but he is still their guy. Saying "uhhhh I don't trust those vaccines" doesn't fly when Q is warning people if they don't back Trump JFK Jr will stay dead or whatever.

A Wide Coalition

This is important, third party or first. No single issue is ever popular enough to propel someone to the finish line just on that single issue. You need to have a stance on everything that's in the public consensus as "important". La Follette's sheer uniqueness gave him the widest coalition of the American left there's ever really been, while George Wallace flirted with Warhawks and the unions. Ross Perot's top concern was the economy, but he also had the most non-interventionist foreign policy and some eccentric ideas on general governance.

I conducted a small (tiny) poll asking random people why they thought RFK Jr was running and to assume it was in good faith. The vast majority of the answers I got were "vaccines". I had three other answers of the dozen or so people I asked - one included Bobby's issues with the FDA, which is technically different but ranting about the chemicals in our food is on a similar wavelength to anti-vaccine rhetoric, two answers included opposition to the duopoly, and one came from an outright Bobby fan who correctly identified Bobby has having the most anti-corporate, pro-environment platform in the race (aided by Biden and Harris not actually having a platform).

No one mentioned his isolationist foreign policy, his shockingly progressive stance on race, his transphobia, or his ties to crypto currency. Because he never really talked about it! It was all about the Duopoly, the FDA, or the Vaccines. He seemed to be trying to build this wide net on his policy page, but gave up when it came time to campaign and focused on his most nutjob stances.

Opposing the Two-Party system isn't enough. If it was, Gary Johnson would be included in this list. Remember him? The 2016 Libertarian candidate, running against two of the least popular mainstream candidates ever. He won 3.28% of the vote, not a terrible result for a third party, but hardly what you would expect from arguably the least popular race of all time.

So RFK Jr doesn't really have a wedge issue, and he doesn't really have a coalition. Surely such a wacky candidate has the final part?

A Unique Voice

He sure did have a unique voice! Because spasmodic dysphonia and he does seek treatment for it, it's very insensitive to make fun of it.

But when it comes to how he campaigned, he was rather standard. He appeared on podcasts… and that was about it

Sitting down and explaining your crank beliefs on a podcast may have been unique in 2010, but it's really not that different from sitting down and explaining your crank beliefs on a TV show these days. In fact, Donald Trump has been the one experimenting with messaging, doing a "X Space" and going on a livestream with popular r-slur Adin Ross.

There is one exception to this. One instance where he had a truly message that wasn't about chemicals, delivered in a manner that was unique and appealed to people outside of his eccentric circle - his Superbowl ad, wherein all that was advertised is that a Kennedy is running for president, and he's younger than Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

The same fricking duopoly message that doesn't work.

In all three factors, Kennedy came up short. He couldn't wedge an issue, he refused to expand his circle, and his campaign style was far blander then his bizarre campaign ideas.

Kenndy and his scandals

The Scandals

Scandals are part of any good campaign, and Kennedy is no exception. His campaign may be more famous for the constant, bizarre scandals then any of his very silly beliefs.

All I can say is Kennedy is very, very lucky that the outlandish scandals overshadowed his dark past.

In the same day he was accused of eating a dog, he was accused of sexually assaulting a woman he hired as babysitter, allegations he responded to with a blasé "I am not a Church Boy". These very serious criminal allegations were overshadowed by the ludicrous ones, a reoccurring theme. The fact he literally had a brainworm overshadowed how this information got out - it was disclosed during divorce proceedings where he was so callous to his ex-wife during and after the marriage, he drove her to suicide. There is a real darkness in Kennedy, overshadowed by the utter farce much of his campaign seemed to be.

The future of third parties

It's hard to not view the future of third party politics as bleak. The party's are more unified then ever, but that's come with polarisation increasing loyalty to the parties. Wedge issues are by their nature impossible to predict, and in the age of mass media, what's unique is generally a very fleeting thing.

Joe Biden dropped out of the race, Donald Trump got shot about two months ago, and the world has just continued to chug with those events just being part of the news cycle. The third party uniqueness vital for them to stand a chance seems like they're much more likely to just be a fad, rather than anything impactful.

I hope I'm wrong. But more likely, you'll see outsiders - like former Reform party member Donald Trump or Independent Bernie Sanders work within the party, and force compromises along inside the system.

She's too cute!

I got some great skincare supplies after work today, and I feel content. I also got a cute lil valentines-ish makeup bag, who am I?

!animalposters !cats

欢迎你们回来！

#freeboounironically

I can't clip it or timestamp youtube movies. Even had to use the console to make a snippet because of the DRM but it starts at 6:10

Yak yak yak... Get a job!

LMAO holy shit