A recent discussion I had about AGP got me thinking about which fetishes cross the line into psychological disorders and it occured to me that every Masochist I've ever met has been self destructive outside of their BDSM shit and every sadist I've met has been sadistic outside of their s*x life too so the idea that the whole thing is a LARP isn't very convincing.

Granted, I'm working with a small sample size but the one hardcore sadist I met IRL was a huge bully in his teen years who did all his "roleplay" with severely depressed chicks and also liked hurting people or watching them get hurt for the fun of it outside of his s*x life and had other antisocial traits. He was also into the really extreme shit like crying and bleeding.

I've met several women into it and unsurprisingly all of them had really low self esteem and depression.

Thoughts?

I (19F) have been dating my boyfriend Austin (24M) for 6 months now but as of recently i started using a vibrator during s*x. The reason is because he rarely makes me c*m and doesn't seem to even try, so i started using toys while he fricked me. At first he didn't seem to care until last night after we finished he said "it's a bit selfish to use that while we're having s*x"

It came as a surprise because he never said anything the other times i used it. I told him it's because i can't c*m from only penetration, keep in mind he doesn't like giving head or fingering. But most times i give him a blowjob to start things off he just never gives anything back. and i give really good head like a lot of times he cums during the blowjob before we even start fricking, which is fine because i like sucking peepee i just don't wanna feel left out

Soo because of this i resorted to using toys which feels amazing but he doesn't like it. I tried coming to some kind of agreement like asking if he can at least stimulate my clit while he's fricking me or even 69 so we both get stimulated, but he said word for word "real Gs don't eat kitty" .... idek what that means but ok

At this point im just getting so sexually frustrated and i feel like i haven't came properly in ages. Idk if im being the butthole here but i'm tempted to end the relationship and find someone else. If you know any guys that aren't selfish in the bedroom and have a high s*x drive, plss send them my way! i don't care about age or looks

What do fat r*dditors think about this dumb fake story?

I second this. REAL men care about their partners' pleasure.

WRONG. REAL men beat their wives. Also this person has only a single submission and it's in /r/poor. Keep yourself safe.

Definitely NTA. If he doesn't care about your pleasure, what's the point? You're not a s*x toy for his convenience.

Yes you are. A s*x toy that cooks and cleans. Know your place, foid.

r/50501 is planning a mass protest at every state capitol tomorrow (2/5/25).

Members of the subreddit are idolizing Luigi Mangione, discussing martyrdom, and calling for revolution. pic.twitter.com/hvdYjQcBSd

— Reddit Lies (@reddit_lies) February 4, 2025

1/ The Russian media has reportedly been ordered by the Kremlin not to cover Donald Trump positively because his agenda is seen by ordinary Russians as better aligned with their own interests and values than that of Vladimir Putin. ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/2YRqX1eWP5

— ChrisO_wiki (@ChrisO_wiki) February 5, 2025

1/ The Russian media has reportedly been ordered by the Kremlin not to cover Donald Trump positively because his agenda is seen by ordinary Russians as better aligned with their own interests and values than that of Vladimir Putin.

2/ The VChK-OGPU Telegram channel reports what a source has told it about a new directive suppressing Russian media coverage of Trump:

3/ "If the policy of the previous US administration easily created an image of an enemy for the average Russian citizen in terms of values, then now Trump, as president, meets the demands of Russian citizens better than Putin himself:

4/ "– a family man with an open large family, information about which is not classified by special services (although the security issues of the Trump family are no less acute than those of his Russian colleague);

– became a billionaire before he even came to power;

5/ "– firmly defends the interests of US citizens in matters of migrant crime and relations with their countries of origin (the recent case of Colombia with Trump's strong rhetoric and Russia's unconvincing cases with Azerbaijan and Tajikistan);

6/ "– promotes tax cuts for its own citizens and businesses while imposing tariffs and duties on foreign countries.

7/ "Whereas Russia is increasing taxes (on profits, VAT, personal income tax, scrappage fees, tariffs of state monopolies in housing and communal services) for its own citizens and businesses, and constant concessions, forgiveness of debts,…

8/ …reduction of supply prices of resources for foreign countries.

The domestic policy of the United States now absolutely coincides with the values that the Kremlin previously made "unique" for Russians.

9/ "A strict command has been given to all media outlets to stop any material on the positive aspects of Trump's domestic policy, and to reduce all news items from the US only to the growth of domestic national and class tensions.

10/ "It is obvious to the Kremlin that Moscow will no longer be able to compete in the field of traditional values with Washington; the mainstream in the Russian media must urgently be changed.

11/ "As one participant in a meeting of a government working group joked: we can lift the ban on LGBT and start supporting transgender politics by introducing it into Russian culture…

12/ … in order to maintain the agenda of global confrontation and an "alternative path" against the Americans.

13/ "Against this background, it is increasingly difficult to explain to Russians why their 'friends' are Turkey, Iran, North Korea and China, which have completely different and in many ways unacceptable cultural values for Russians…

14/ …(and the latter country is also taking advantage of the situation by sucking all the profit margins from Russia into its economy)

LET US ENABLE TOTAL REDDITOR DEATH AND TOTAL ZIGGER DEATH AT THE SAME TIME

#MAGA #MUGA #MIGA #TRD #TZD

!trump2024 !trump2028 !the_donald !project2025 !chuds !accelerationists

Ιf wе dоnt соunt sub 50B аíd ít shоuļd bе 440B mínímum

But wíkí stореd uрdаtíng ít

How is big sis going to freeze the whole entire patriarchy if she can't even freeze reddit jannies 😭

In Berlin, a decision has been made to sideline and silence the Iranian people and to appease the Islamic Republic.

At this important moment of change in Iran, I was pleased to be invited to take part in this year’s @MunSecConf. However, my participation in this conference has…

— Reza Pahlavi (@PahlaviReza) February 6, 2025

What did they mean by this

Dismal decision by Germany. They should back track. Western govts should firmly back the Iranian people and open the door to an important figure opposing Khomeini’s export of Islamist terror to the UK and around the world https://t.co/5LUHaJHp6R

— Lord Walney (@LordWalney) February 6, 2025

🔴 Unbelievable:

Germany has BLOCKED Iran's King in Exile from attending a conference in Munich, without specifying why.

Meanwhile they gladly open their doors to mullahs, regime supporters and anti-Western propagandists.@GermanyDiplo what is this insanity? pic.twitter.com/0iFP7aHGGi

— 𝗡𝗶𝗼𝗵 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗴 ♛ ✡︎ (@NiohBerg) February 6, 2025

The shameful action of the German Foreign Ministry must be strongly condemned.
Prince Reza Pahlavi is the voice of the Iranian people and their hope for the liberation of Iran from the criminal Islamic Republic regime.
The refusal to allow Prince Reza Pahlavi to attend the Munich… pic.twitter.com/LA1jsx65QS

— Shahin Najafi 𓃬☼ (@shahinnajafi80) February 6, 2025

Shame on @ABaerbock, Germany's far-left Foreign Minister, who, despite the previous invitation to His Majesty @PahlaviReza for the @MunSecConf, has pulled strings to keep him out.

This is a blatant slap in the face to the Iranian ppl, the essence of democracy, and free speech,… pic.twitter.com/h5d27TrtUJ

— 𓄂✺Yaar - يار ‌‌قدیمی🎗️ (@YaarGhadimi) February 6, 2025

Why is it always the leftist/globalist western politicians who bow to and appease the terrorist Islamic Regime occupying Iran?

Germany's @ABaerbock is no different than Canada's @JustinTrudeau.

Enabling and appeasing a bloodthirsty Islamofascist Dictatorship is not a good look. https://t.co/OjtT4CfN0q pic.twitter.com/kItEoQ0EtJ

— Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری (@gghamari) February 6, 2025

.@ABaerbock @GermanyDiplo
You claim democracy and human rights, but you are allies with dictators and terrorists.
Shame on you.#WeRemember pic.twitter.com/H9Fd9HyGQw

— TIGER (@tanhayektiger) February 6, 2025

I remember when I first joined it was kind of cheeky and irreverent, and it still seemed plausible that women posted here. But it's become progressively more shallow and heartless. I mean I can't be the only one picking up on this, right? "The worst thing about DOGE is how soy it all is"? We can't just express outrage at immorality anymore, every criticism must be given through the lens of haughty indifference and framed around coolness or lack thereof. I think some people here have genuinely replaced their concept of wrong and right with cringe/not cringe and never stopped to consider how cruel and purposeless it could make them.

every criticism must be given through the lens of haughty indifference and framed around coolness or lack thereof

Quick question did you ever listen to the pod? Like even one clip or so?

People actually listen to Rspod?!

Gooooood, for the 100,000th time - this is a unique sub and one of the only decent culture/current events subs on reddit, the podcast sucks shit so most people here either never listened or stopped listening in 2019 (me). I used to like A&D but in the last five years one became a Fox News dork and the other is hawking a shit coin, they've changed. That being said, what drew me to them and this sub in the first place was their critique/thoughts on the overly woke/grifter left and establishment liberals. What I and many didn't know back in 2018 was A&D are insecure dorks who just adopt whatever ideology they currently find chic/edgy, and as soon as Bernie/progressive politics became boring they moved onto the next thing. But a lot of us here have beliefs based on morality/ethics/what we find to be true, so here we are

Tldr: "I have never and will never engage with the content this sub is about but here's how it should be run."

Anyways I thought this was a fun thread. The commenters even got OP to self delete out of shame.

!redscarepod

Streamer Emiru threw a Lunar New Years Party so all the lonely s that watch her can pretend they have friends. At one point a newer streamer named itskatchii who was quite drunk does a "heart goes out to you". Emiru's mods have quietly tried to push it under the rug, but none can stop the weaponized autism that is terminally online streamer drama enjoyers.

Here's a clip of the salute in question: https://i.imgur.com/salute-GcZquYx

bottom text

I have gradually accumulated this 2025 year of skincare spares from dollar tree. Their glow recipe dupes are amazing, too! I love the collagen line (blue containers and droppers). If anyone has skincare questions, hmu!

I'm sensing that horror game invented a genre. Someone is working on a femboy clone.

At his annual Super Bowl news conference Monday, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell strongly supported the league's policies designed to promote diversity at the club-employment level and said they would continue.

But during Super Bowl LIX, and with President Donald Trump apparently planning to attend on Sunday, the NFL might be making another kind of statement on the Caesars Superdome field itself. According to two league sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the discussions, league officials recently changed one of the slogans expected to be stenciled in the back of an end zone from "End Racism" to "Choose Love."

The game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Philadelphia Eagles will mark the first time since February 2021 that "End Racism" is not included as a message in the back of a Super Bowl end zone.

The switch, conveyed internally to high-level employees earlier this week, could be perceived as a nod to the current political climate. Following the lead of Trump, who was inaugurated last month, many corporations and institutions are abandoning their diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Goodell did not follow suit when asked about the league's policies on Monday, saying he was "proud" of the league's diversity efforts.

"We got into diversity efforts because we felt it was the right thing for the National Football League," Goodell said. "And we're going to continue those efforts, because we've not only convinced ourselves we've proven it to ourselves — it does make the NFL better."

!mensfootball discuss

cheeky U2 pilot lol

I am sorry I let you all down.