@Poj took this before leaving for chad in the uk !friendsofpizzashill !incels !truecels

Proudly stolen from Autodrama

I’m in 100,000 dollars of debt from this movie. It will eventually be on streaming.

I get it, I used to torrent, but this was an indie project made by a bunch of broke trans people. If you steal this film or torrent it, you’re actually actively hurting the queer community https://t.co/fmh4QOwyhw

— Vera🃏 (@VeraDrew22) April 28, 2024

!kino

https://twitter.com/riddiodrome/status/1784653794623500650

https://twitter.com/zoesnotaposter/status/1784653633482547556

https://twitter.com/typejnegative/status/1784815941563437338

https://twitter.com/Venssae/status/1784782948195283139

https://twitter.com/newtypefool/status/1784708270881456217

https://twitter.com/cyberdogalex/status/1784794658532458497

https://twitter.com/Rayve_777/status/1784808799842247093

https://twitter.com/vivvian_Strange/status/1784695644906774841

https://twitter.com/positivelaser/status/1784659093652647957

https://twitter.com/atadblue/status/1784970181342585124

https://twitter.com/clementineultra/status/1784685763944198627

https://twitter.com/AmericanFilmAFI/status/1784953602924032434

If you've never heard of The People's Joker it's an indie parody of that's been going round film festivals lately

The film unofficially parodies characters from the Batman comics, and the main character is a transgender woman based on the Joker, played by Drew. The film also features Scott Aukerman, Tim Heidecker, Maria Bamford, David Liebe Hart, Robert Wuhl, and Bob Odenkirk in supporting roles

In a dystopian world monitored by Batman, a young child grows up in Smallville, Kansas idolizing the performers on a sketch comedy program, UCB Live. The unnamed protagonist's mother is disturbed when her child asks, "Was I born in the wrong body?" and immediately books a session with Dr. Crane of Arkham Asylum, who prescribes Smylex: a drug that forces its users to put on a happy face, even if they feel depression, anxiety, or gender dysphoria.

They set up in an abandoned warehouse at a dilapidated carnival and are quickly joined by a number of law-breaking comedians with their own deliberately unfunny and uncomfortable acts. One of these is Jason "Mr. J" Todd, who dresses as a Joker of his own and tells Marxist observational humor. Mr. J and the hero immediately strike up a bond and go on a date that includes Mr. J's revelation that he is a transgender man who recently left an abusive relationship. This helps encourage the protagonist to articulate that she is a transgender woman and the two plot to have her dive into a vat of estrogen to gender transition

As the duo evade guards at the chemical plant, a retired Batman appears to stop them and it leaves Mr. J shaken. While the protagonist finally feels happy for the first time after emerging from the chemicals, Mr. J reveals that his ex is Batman. The crimefighter adopted orphan Carrie Kelley and trained her to be his sidekick Robin, even assisting with a gender transition to the identity of Jason Todd, but their relationship became toxic and sexual, in spite of their large age difference and the fact that Batman was a father figure to the seventeen year old.

Cute pictures of her new velvet hippo Hickory:

https://old.reddit.com/r/velvethippos/comments/1ceklyc/welp_my_husband_brought_his_first_dog_home_to_stay/?sort=controversial

Hickory is home! After a decent introduction to Honey, we took him home. Honey was only slightly annoying to him as she yodeled loudly in his face for the first 30 minutes she met him. So, here he is! Hickory the Hippo!

Some of the typical comments:

Hickory is going to need lots of tennis balls!! I love him so much. Completely adorable! 🧡💙

⠀

He's beautiful I love him 🥰❤️ congratulations!

⠀

Honey still seems displeased.

Displeased? She looks like she's completely disassociated. Unable to comprehend the horror of the situation.

>tfw your dipshit owner brings home another pibble

Only 3 hours later, disaster strikes!

https://old.reddit.com/r/velvethippos/comments/1ceprr6/that_was_horribly_shortlived_and_i_feel_horrible/?sort=controversial

Hickory bit honey. I had just gone into my bedroom to take a nap. My husband and two sons were in the living room with the dogs. The dogs were fine. Then my daughter came home. Honey immediately ran to greet her, as did Hickory. The next thing I heard was a dog screaming and my husband screaming, “NO!! NO!! STOP!!” I ran out, and Hickory had Honey by the head. Right as I got to them, he shook her. I put pressure behind his jaw and he immediately let go of her and backed away. I had both dogs by the collar and told my husband to take Hickory to another part of the house away from Honey while I assessed her wounds. Two punctures on her ear lobe, and a puncture on her cheek. We called the vet and got instructions to care for her. The dogs are separated in different areas of the house, with strict instructions about who is to play with him, because we have a 5 year old child who is obsessed with him. We are flabbergasted. The meet and greet with them went well. We contacted a friend of ours who runs a pit rescue. We DO NOT want to take him back to the kill shelter. I fricking feel HORRIBLE. I feel like I failed Hickory, Honey, my family, and the shelter. I'm literally sick about it.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Both dogs were on leashes. Unfortunately, they both ran to see my daughter at the same time, and I'm guessing the poor guy was just overstimulated . He is NOT a bad boy. He is a sweet, sweet guy. I've been in contact with my vet and some friends who do rescue. One is a veterinarian that specifically does pibbles. Humphrey had a hard time at first, too. He was terrified and reactive to men. It took a lot of work, but he did fine. We currently have the dogs in separate halves of the house. They can see and hear each other, but can't get to each other.

He's NOT a bad boy he's so sweet he only chewed on my dog's head a little bit

If you can't reasonably keep them separated for a bit, then for everyone's safety, return to the shelter but please do not tell them about the bite because it'll be an instant death sentence. Just say your dog wasn't getting along with him and it wasn't a good fit.

GOOD idea, there's too many toddlers in the world anyway

OP, is your Husband the one who's had most of the interactions with Hickory, or are You the one? Because it may have been a relatively "simple" matter (although ADMITTEDLY Terrifying!) matter of resource guarding.💖 Both dogs were FINE, and doing reasonably well together UNTIL your Daughter walked in. She was a NEW human, and therefore a NEW resource for both dogs. He wanted the resource (remember, he hasn't HAD many resources to call his OWN in who knows how long, living in a shelter!💖), and he was trying to protect that resource (even though the resource was your DAUGHTER!), from Honey. Work with your vet, work with your friend who's been with the rescue, AND see if there's anyone GOOD locally, who works in Behavior, who you guys can tap in for advice!💝 You're very much still in that FIRST Three, of the 3-3-3 rule, correct? For now, YES, ABSOLUTELY keep the kids away unless you're next to them, keep the dogs separate but able to see/smell & get used to each other, and then take it slowly and assess each step!💖 This MAY be a deal-breaker, OR it may be a simple blip. Time, patience, and careful observation will tell you which one it truly is!

I can't be the only one who finds the juxtaposition funny between the sparkly hearts and the advice on how to stop your dogs eating each other

Bonus Post

The same foid's previous (now deceased) pibble, chilling next to her baby. Just to give you an idea of how foidbrained this foid really is

!chuds Contact me for tips on creating a superior rdrama viewing experience

Hello, long term lurker, first time poster. I have to tell someone this because it's been eating at me and I can't tell anyone else about in real life, not even my best friend.

About two years ago, I was dating this guy, I'm gonna call Shane for simplicity. Shane was 26 and really sweet, one of the nicest guys I have ever dated. There was a lot to like about him (good looking, in shape, had the same style of humor and hobbies as me, a great career, his own place in a nice city, etc) and I really, truly, loved him at one point. However, there was one thing I did not like about him and that was his consumption of porn. Even when I asked him to stop watching porn, he couldn't stop for more than a few days before he was back at it again. He would do it because he claimed he needed it to relax and go to sleep. He wouldn't watch porn whenever I visited him, but whenever I wasn't there, he would. I could always tell when he was watching porn because he would, out of the blue, start sending me a ton of super sexual text messages, and wouldn't stop until he came. He would spend hours trying to find the "perfect" video to get off to. His porn addiction was really bad.

Anyway, his sexual appetite was not just limited to porn, he wanted to have s*x and do sexual stuff all the time whenever we were together. I didn't mind that he wanted to have s*x a lot, especially since he was good at making sure my own needs were met (lol) but what annoyed me was him always wanting to try new kinky stuff. Some stuff I agreed to, like wearing a choker or thigh high heels, but other stuff I refused, like him wanting me to put anything in my butt. If I had been wiser to what I know now, I would have dumped him right when I realized he was addicted to porn. Unfortunately, at the time, I thought all guys watched a ton of porn and that this was "normal". Besides, I really cared for him and loved him at the time, so I mostly let his pestering slide. Besides, it was easy to forgive and forget because once I said "no", he would drop it and wouldn't ask again until a week or so later.

One day, he asked me again if he could do butt related stuff, to which I again said no. This time, instead of just dropping it, he persisted and tried to convince me. He showed me articles from real women that claim to love anal s*x. He showed me porn links of women who were loving it, he promised me he would go slow, be gentle, and that we could work our way up to it with buttplugs. I was disgusted with this and annoyed that he wouldn't drop the subject, so I told him I'd agree to have anal s*x but only if he let me peg him first. I figured he would say no, but he said alright, he would let me peg him. He then dropped the subject.

I thought he was only joking and forgot all about it, until two weeks or so later when I went to his house, he showed me that he had bought a harness and dildo for pegging. I was horrified and told him I didn't think he was serious. But he was. He was dead serious, and worse, he looked excited. I remember telling him, "Shane, I'm not fricking you in the butt." and him looking hurt. He said that he thought I was serious when I offered to peg him, and he was willing to be vulnerable with me in order to prove how much he trusted me. He said he wouldn't even expect me to let him frick me in the butt if I pegged him.

To make a long story short, he did convince me to peg him. I did not want to do it, but a part of me hoped that he would see that it was painful and then he wouldn't want to pursue it anymore. Unfortunately, I hadn't known it at the time, but Shane had been doing anal play on himself with toys long before we had started dating, so basically this was not at all painful for him, and he was really into it.

Me? I was so turned off. I had never understood what people meant when they said their partner did something that gave them the "ick" and then suddenly they fell completely out of love with them. That sounded hard to believe; how could anyone simply cease to stop loving someone instantly over something relatively minor? And yet that is exactly what happened to me. As I watched his face and listened to him getting off to this, something in me snapped, and I instantly found him repulsive. I suddenly no longer had any feelings for him and made up my mind right then and there to dump him later.

I don't know how long I fricked Shane in his butt, maybe 10 minutes? But I had to stop, not only because it was so cringe and such a turn off, but because fricking someone with a strap on is actually a lot of work, especially when you're not used to it. I made some excuse to Shane in order to go home. I lied to him when he texted me asking if I liked it. I should have been honest and said "No, Shane, you looked stupid, and I felt disgusted." but I didn't want to be mean. Even though I was no longer in love with him anymore, I felt it would be too cruel to shame a man when it comes to s*x. They're very sensitive about that stuff.

Over the next couple of weeks, things were awkward, I kept making excuses to stay busy and distant. Finally, I couldn't take it anymore and bluntly dumped him via text. I made a dumb excuse about me having too much going on in my life and that I needed to work on me. He was absolutely heart broken and tried several times for months to win me back, even buying me lots of gifts and writing me long love letters. He even stopped watching porn for 3 whole weeks and said he'd give it up for good. I felt kind of bad but every time I'd start to feel bad, I'd have that image of him laying back on the bed, being penetrated by me, and I would instantly feel nothing but contempt.

Why am I sharing this with rDrama? Because, everyone loved Shane and to this day people don't understand why I broke up with him. Everyone thought he was perfect for me, that he was a great catch and would have made the perfect husband. I get annoyed whenever the subject comes up, because I can't be honest. I can't say "Shane was a disgusting porn addict!" or "I fricked Shane in his hairy butthole and he looked so emasculated in that position!". I have to give some half-butt excuse that we had "different life goals" or whatever. People will then pester me and ask me why it couldn't have worked out. Part of me doesn't want to be honest with them because it's embarrassing, but the other part of me worries if some of my friends won't try to convince me that being into porn and anal s*x is good, actually, and that I should stop being a prude.

The other reason I'm posting this is because I haven't found another guy that was as good as Shane. Every guy I've dated since Shane has been meh. It makes me angry that Shane was perfect in just about every way, except his porn habits. Why did he have to be such a freak? We could be married by now if he hadn't been such a coomer.

Anyway, that's my vent. I hope this can serve as a warning to other women, if your boyfriend says he wants to be pegged, DO NOT ACCEPT THE OFFER! YOU WILL NEVER LOOK AT HIM THE SAME WAY!

Holy heck! He might be a security guard not sure but this filled me with so much joy that I can be running on this joy for a year.

The people laughing in the background

!chuds !anticommunists

Didn't see any drama threads about this. Governor Newsom signed a bill that would raise utility bills for Californians based on income.

Under $28,000 income — $24 per month

$28,000 to $69,000 income — $34 per month

$69,000 to $180,000 income –$73 per month

Over $180,000 income — $128 per month

This is on top of current utility rates.

Commiefornia Redditors in the thread explain they're happy to pay the increases while others are screaming for the heads of PG&E execs (and a few for the legislators who actually passed this lol)

Solar users are irate that they are also going to be charged regardless

https://old.reddit.com/r/TeslaSolar/comments/145guxv/california_rate_changes_will_screw_rooftop_solar/?sort=controversial

Bay Area malding

https://old.reddit.com/r/bayarea/comments/1algswt/the_pge_sucks_megathread/?sort=controversial

!metashit is this a good look for wpd and carp?

Serious connection or Gold Digger

As an older man, I often run into a huge number of young women who say they want an older man to have a relationship with, but turn out wanting a "sugar daddy" or someone to take care of them.

I have even seen advice here suggesting young women promise men s*x and flirt with them to get gifts and money with no intention of engaging in a sincere relationship.

Without outright saying "I'm poor, you're going to be pulling your own weight." how should an older man seek out and make connections with attractive women that may be younger or similar in age?

If you are a woman, what attracts you to older men that is not money and "stability"?

The right used to hate backwards women hating ideologies like Islam

Now many “red pill” influencers are embracing it

Apparently all it takes is a couple extra 💰💰💰 to support the cultural decimation they used to warn about

Pathetic pic.twitter.com/jinV6vxnwd

— Lauren Southern (@Lauren_Southern) April 24, 2024

https://twitter.com/joe_norte/status/1783071396714664361

Pre-Weimar Christianity was more like Islam than modern day Onlyfans Christianity.

men will pick their allies carefully and they will not be fooled.

https://twitter.com/H0US30FW0LV3S/status/1783353685122203777

Everyone in that photo genuinely looks inbred lmfao

https://twitter.com/joe_norte/status/1783354888015011903

so?

does most people around the world are inbred.

it is only in our cosmopolitan society where race mixing is celebrated and the norm

LMFAO rightoids want to RETVRN to inbreeding now !moidmoment !mayomoment

https://twitter.com/AvdullahYousef/status/1783537047598227907

Keep crying Lauren 👍🏻

Converting to Islam couldn't save that whiteoid's teeth

https://www.today.com/health/tammy-slaton-weight-loss-rcna149196

https://old.reddit.com/r/popculturechat/comments/1ccrkxe/harvey_weinsteins_conviction_is_overturned_by_new/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1ccrtvx/new_yorks_highest_court_on_thursday_overturned/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/nyc/comments/1ccrjgq/harvey_weinsteins_conviction_is_overturned_by_new/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1ccrnhh/harvey_weinsteins_conviction_is_overturned_by_new/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/entertainment/comments/1ccrjeq/harvey_weinsteins_conviction_is_overturned_by_new/?sort=controversial

Harvey Weinstein's r*pe conviction overturned in New York

The disgraced movie producer was convicted of r*pe in February 2020.

The r*pe conviction of movie producer Harvey Weinstein has been overturned by New York's highest court.

The New York Court of Appeals, in a 4-3 opinion, overturned Weinstein's conviction on s*x crimes against three women, finding the trial judge "erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes."

The court said that testimony "served no material non-propensity purpose" and "portrayed defendant in a highly prejudicial light."

Weinstein, 72, was a well-known, powerful man within the entertainment industry and prosecutors said he abused his power to take advantage of aspiring female actors, like the alleged victims, to coerce them into unwanted sexual encounters. According to the prosecution, the quid pro quo of assisting them with their careers in exchange for sexual favors on demand was both common behavior and a well-known secret throughout the film industry.

Prosecutors said the testimony of women other than those whose claims formed the basis of the criminal charges spoke to Weinstein's state of mind to use forcible compulsion. The majority opinion, however, said that eviscerated the time-tested rule against propensity evidence, "which, in criminal cases, serves as a judicial bulwark against a guilty verdict based on supposition rather than proof."

Weinstein remains in prison. The Manhattan district attorney's office could decide to retry him.

Weinstein was also convicted of s*x offenses in Los Angeles and sentenced to 16 years in prison there.

!dramatards

• Writer Tracie McMillan claims being white has benefited her by $371,934.30

• She argues that her family was able to save money because of white privilege

• Her claims are detailed in her new book

A Brooklyn-based journ*list calculated exactly how much racism and white privilege has financially benefited her down to the last cent - coming in at a whopping $371,000.

In her new book, 'The White Bonus: Five Families and the Cash Value of Racism,' author Tracie McMillan claims that being white has created a benefit worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

McMillan derived the number, in part, by tracing the amount of money she's received from her family over years, money she claims her family was able to save up over generations because of their whiteness.

Figuring largely into her final sum were educational loans that she received from her grandfather, totaling at $52,784.33.

McMillan, a graduate of NYU, where she studied political science, contends that her grandfather was able to give her this money because he had been able to accumulate wealth over years thanks to his whiteness.

She argues that her grandfather's wealth was rooted in benefits accrued from the GI Bill, a post-World War II piece of legislation that helped military veterans attend school and receive job training.

The Brooklyn-based writer argues that the GI Bill 'heavily favored whites,' and therefore benefited her grandfather at the expense of non-whites.

McMillan also received $40,384.72 as an inheritance from her grandfather, which, again, she contends was money that was owed to her grandfather's whiteness.

She also received $15,086.74 from her parents, which she referred to vaguely as a gift. McMillan, in a graphic posted on her website, fails to elaborate on why this 'gift from parents' was attributable to their whiteness.

The writer also cites 'avoiding foster care' as a consequence of her whiteness, which is an assertion that almost suggests that all non-whites are automatically in foster care.

She puts the value of avoiding foster care at $15,771.37.

But McMillan claims that the money she's received from her family is only one part of her 'white bonus.'

The NYU-graduate contends that her rent-stabilized apartment, has saved her $1,319.86 in costs due to discrimination that she never faced given the fact she is white.

Another white privilege was her 'job as a tutor with Maggie,' from which she claims she received $26,858.04 more than non-white tutors.

And McMillan also asserts that she's been spared $37,488.11 in credit discrimination when accessing credit.

Explaining her calculus to CNN, the Brooklyn Journ*list said: 'I calculate $146,000 from my family that probably they had because of racism.'

'I calculate $225,000 of money that I have had access to or equity I've gained probably because I was white. That's almost $400,000.'

Asked why she had written the book, McMillan said: 'I hope that readers who aren't White feel seen, too — that somebody out there who's White does see how this is happening.'

McMillan insists that her nearly $400,000 estimate only scratches the surface.

'All these are back of the envelope estimates. They are bare minimums.'

'The White Bonus,' McMillan's new book, focuses on how white privilege benefits the middle class because 'the middle class is really the fulcrum for White advantage in the US.'

In her book, McMillan lays out her argument that all white families in America have benefited because of their race,

'White people today do not understand — because this history has been hidden from them by previous generations — that somebody in their family got something because they were White.'

When McMillan announced her tour for her new book on X.com, formerly Twitter, some commenters criticized the book's premise.

One user wrote: 'Maybe we should re-label white privilege to “white, upper middle class” privilege. Since a lot of us that grew up poor didn't have the “bonuses” you enjoyed.'

Another commenter asked: 'Will you be donating all the profits from this book to black causes?'

And one critic observed: 'Money from inheritance, parents paying for college and loan from grandparents isn't a white bonus. It's a upper-class bonus.'

They continued: 'Go interview lower-class and middle-class white people and ask about their college, inheritance and loans from grandparents.'

!chuds !foidmoment

Reddit and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race pic.twitter.com/NTj2E8tVjP

— Sic 👔 (@soyencedenier) April 28, 2024

everything is reddit

An American dad faces 12 years in prison for having a tiny bit of hunting ammo in his carry on bag in Turks and Caicos.

He could miss his son growing up over this.

Do not visit there until he’s sent home. Let @TCIPremier know what you think about this! pic.twitter.com/ssOjS5sOPE

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) April 24, 2024

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1783131128922087840

Bruh it's just spare bullets, he didn't know it was illegal!

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1783146493731295429

Y'all

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1783145423978242252

https://twitter.com/shakoistsLog/status/1783271257628438555

Remember Brittney?

https://twitter.com/smalls2672/status/1783146569136496837

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Fair, but that would still make the answer obvious. People are religious because there is a god. If the question was how people could love a god that allowed for evil it would be one thing, but being religious just means adhering to a religion. IMO this is just more of another "how stupid are religious people" loaded question that doesn't really fit with the purpose of the sub. You can't really have serious conversation with someone who is just railing against something they disagree with. (10)

People are religious because they BELIEVE there is a god.Stating that there is a god as fact is not something anyone can do, because there is no empirical evidence one exists. Hence the concept of faith.I do truly believe that if children were not indoctrinated into religion from birth, religion would mostly cease to exist by the time that generation of children was dying of old age. I don't think the concept of a god existing is something that anyone would believe after the age that kids stop believing in santa if the concept was introduced after that age.My family was not religious when I was growing up, I never believed in Santa or the tooth fairy or anything like that. All humans are born atheists. They believe in god because they were taught to. Especially now with the technology and scientific understanding that we have about the world, explaining how the world was created by relying on literal magic is.... baffling.If it gives people comfort and they practice their faith... (-6)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

To each their own I guess turns out I have testicular cancer and it is not increasing my faith (10)

God is testing you. (-5)

Basedness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

You didn't mention mention Christianity once which is really what this seems to be describing, especially with the capitalization on god. The true reddit moment here is me excepting you to have asked this in good faith. I was raised in an extremely religious family and can talk for a long time about it. I'm still very open to people having faith even though I don't myself anymore. I also did a lot of soul searching and research into other religions at various points in my life. I find the subject very interesting.Anyway, sorry for assuming you were genuine. Have a good one. (6)

You used so many words to say literally nothing (-3)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Terrible terrible analogy (1)

But it's what you are claming. There is no physics because Isaac Newton kicked my dog.There is something I don't like in the universe there for any conclusion you wish to make.How can people drive Fords when cancer exists.How can Hampsters be kept as pets when cancer exists.What the heck does cancer have to do with the existence of Keven Smith?Why haven't you cured cancer! You must be evil. There is no way you exist.This is the dumbest logic. Cancer has no more barring on the existence of god then phyics does. Why do plains crash if there is a god. Why is there poison if god exists. Why do I have to wipe my own butt if god exists.There are really debates to be had about the existence of god, but this is just dumb. (3)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

For Christians, the answer is laid out in Genesis.Essentially, we live in a broken world rife with suffering. It's an inescapable fact of life, even if some of us are hit harder than others. This isn't in line with how God originally designed the world and humanity, or even the ultimate destination He has in store for us, but it was our own free will that led us to sin, which brings with it the wage of death.That isn't the end of the story, though. Jesus Christ was crucified and died so that humans could be redeemed. The word 'excruciating', as in excruciating pain, was derived from crucifixion, if that gives you an idea of how horrible of a death it is.If you accept that God became man and suffered the most horrible pain imaginable just so that we can be saved, you can accept a lot of suffering yourself, even if it's completely out of your control.Job explores your particular line of questioning pretty extensively. Honestly, some of it would be right at home in the lyrics of a Midw... (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

A truly loving god wouldnt allow this type of suffering, if god is real it is either indifferent or malevolent (-1)

You think that, and yet, God so loved the world that He sent His one and only begotten Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, to die on the cross for our sins, that whosoever believes in Him, shall not perish, but have everlasting life. For Christ did not come to condemn the world, but to save it.The world has chosen its own condemnation. Every day someone dies to murder. Every day someone lies. Every day someone blasphemes the Lord.And yet we have the gall to think we know the mind of God? Were we there at creation? When He placed the first animals, or first formed the Earth? Were we there when God separated the waters from the waters? Were we there when God separated land from the water?No. To say that we know anything, or to even think we know anything of God's plans is arrogance of the highest order.You ask why there's hardship, and I tell you because Christ suffered the worst form of torture known to man, as a living sacrifice. That we only might be saved. He knew many of us would rejec... (0)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/MuffinsandCoffee2024

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+0🐮)

Number of comments: 11

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

We love animals, but tough decisions like this happen all the time on a farm. Sadly, we just had to put down 3 horses a few weeks ago that had been in our family for 25 years.

If you want more real, honest, and politically INcorrect stories that’ll have the media gasping,… pic.twitter.com/bKhpUkchHV

— Kristi Noem (@KristiNoem) April 26, 2024

I grew up on a farm but luckily it wasn't Kristi Noem's farm or otherwise I'd be dead in a gravel pit.

I'm not making this up when I say she brought a happy tail wagging 14-month-old puppy to a gravel pit and then murdered it in cold blood and threw it into a shallow grave rather than find it a new home. Everything I just said is true and something she admitted to thinking she would get votes.

She literally wrote this into a book and it's not the only animal she murdered in the story lmao

This is the puppy btw:

To fully grasp the current situation in San Francisco, where venture capitalists are trying to take control of City Hall, you must listen to Balaji Srinivasan. Before you do, steel yourself for what's to come: A normal person could easily mistake his rambling train wrecks of thought for a crackpot's ravings, but influential Silicon Valley billionaires regard him as a genius.

“Balaji has the highest rate of output per minute of good new ideas of anybody I've ever met,” wrote Marc Andreessen, co-founder of the V.C. firm Andreessen-Horowitz, in a blurb for Balaji's 2022 book, The Network State: How to Start a New Country. The book outlines a plan for tech plutocrats to exit democracy and establish new sovereign territories. I mentioned Balaji's ideas in two previous stories about Network State–related efforts in California—a proposed tech colony called California Forever and the tech-funded campaign to capture San Francisco's government.

Balaji, a 43-year-old Long Island native who goes by his first name, has a solid Valley pedigree: He earned multiple degrees from Stanford University, founded multiple startups, became a partner at Andreessen-Horowitz and then served as chief technology officer at Coinbase. He is also the leader of a cultish and increasingly strident neo-reactionary tech political movement that sees American democracy as an enemy. In 2013, a New York Times story headlined “Silicon Valley Roused by Secession Call” described a speech in which he “told a group of young entrepreneurs that the United States had become ‘the Microsoft of nations': outdated and obsolescent.”

“The speech won roars from the audience at Y Combinator, a leading start-up incubator,” reported the Times. Balaji paints a bleak picture of a dystopian future in a U.S. in chaos and decline, but his prophecies sometimes fall short. Last year, he lost $1 million in a public bet after wrongly predicting a massive surge in the price of Bitcoin.

Still, his appetite for autocracy is bottomless. Last October, Balaji hosted the first-ever Network State Conference. Garry Tan—the current Y Combinator CEO who's attempting to spearhead a political takeover of San Francisco—participated in an interview with Balaji and cast the effort as part of the Network State movement. Tan, who made headlines in January after tweeting “die slow motherlovers” at local progressive politicians, frames his campaign as an experiment in “moderate” politics. But in a podcast interview one month before the conference, Balaji laid out a more disturbing and extreme vision.

“What I'm really calling for is something like tech Zionism,” he said, after comparing his movement to those started by the biblical Abraham, Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith (founder of Mormonism), Theodor Herzl (“spiritual father” of the state of Israel), and Lee Kuan Yew (former authoritarian ruler of Singapore). Balaji then revealed his shocking ideas for a tech-governed city where citizens loyal to tech companies would form a new political tribe clad in gray t-shirts. “And if you see another Gray on the street … you do the nod,” he said, during a four-hour talk on the Moment of Zen podcast. “You're a fellow Gray.”

The Grays' shirts would feature “Bitcoin or Elon or other kinds of logos … Y Combinator is a good one for the city of San Francisco in particular.” Grays would also receive special ID cards providing access to exclusive, Gray-controlled sectors of the city. In addition, the Grays would make an alliance with the police department, funding weekly “policeman's banquets” to win them over.

“Grays should embrace the police, okay? All-in on the police,” said Srinivasan. “What does that mean? That's, as I said, banquets. That means every policeman's son, daughter, wife, cousin, you know, sibling, whatever, should get a job at a tech company in security.”

In exchange for extra food and jobs, cops would pledge loyalty to the Grays. Srinivasan recommends asking officers a series of questions to ascertain their political leanings. For example: “Did you want to take the sign off of Elon's building?”

This refers to the August 2023 incident in which Elon Musk illegally installed a large flashing X logo atop Twitter headquarters, in violation of building safety codes. City inspectors forced him to remove it. This was the second time Musk had run afoul of the city in his desire to refurbish his headquarters: In July, police briefly halted his attempt to pry the “Twitter” signage from the building's exterior. But in Balaji's dystopia, he implies that officers loyal to the Grays would let Musk do as he pleases (democratically inclined officers, he suggests, can be paid to retire).

Simply put, there is a ton of fascist-chic cosplay involved. Once an officer joins the Grays, they get a special uniform designed by their tech overlords. The Grays will also donate heavily to police charities and “merge the Gray and police social networks.” Then, in a show of force, they'll march through the city together.

!clinklickers MOAR WORDS...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lazy-girl-job-what-is-it/

Meanwhile:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomspiggle/2021/05/25/the-gender-pay-gap-why-its-still-here/

https://old.reddit.com/r/absolutelynotme_irl/comments/1cbpory/absolutelynotme_irl/?sort=controversial

We posting incel dogwhistles on here now?

Get help for your fetish

You will never ever ever guess what subreddit shes active in. She also posted this

They don't want you either incel

Racist incel losers

Seething roastie.

this is creepy and weird

Ive found if you just stay healthy and not be a racist frick, this is the best pulling years of your life, try not going down conspiracy rabbit holes and not being hateful, you'll be a fricking unicorn these days.

You hear about the shortage of ugly reddit r-slurs nowadays?

Passport bros need to get the frick out of my country. We're not some lesser race that'll pamper you for being a man child. If you go after Asian women because they're "traditional" that just means You're a racist misogynistic creep.

Nah. We'll stay. And women love us in your country. Seethe

Enjoy it but the fact you can't pull girls in your own country is pathetic 😆

It's not pathetic. Average men are repulsive to American women. I'm Average so I can't pull. Fortunately I don't have to. I can just travel and pull in Asian countries

It's pretty fricking pathetic man it takes like no effort to take care of yourself and go outside and talk to the opposite gender 🤦‍♂️

Cope lmao, American girls are easy af

They are easy for Chad. I'm not Chad. I have no game. And I don't need it. I just go to Asia. They are slimmer and better looking with more pleasant personalities anyway. Everyone wins

Asian girls will still leave you the second they find a guy who doesn't have a dog shit personality, you're gonna die alone and it's completely on you

I haven't experienced that. Projecting your reddit brainrot onto asian women doesn't really work in reality. Dating in Asia as an average American man is paradise. No amount of downvotes, insults or snark can ruin it

paragraph warning

You actually just have a warped view of gender and it leads you to believe lies about women. Youre living a fantasy in your head bro. "Chad" isnt real and there are girls that like average guys. You need therapy my guy you know an incel just went on a stabbing spree at a mall? This line of thinking is unhealthy and there is help available bro. There are vastly less differences between the sexes than youve led yourself to believe you just need some actual exposure, and to stop surrounding yourself with people spewing hateful, unscientific rhetoric. Its not about insults or snark your idealogy is harmful to yourself and the world around you. You are making your life harder on yourself, not women, not "Chad", but you alone. You are the maker of your own destiny. Youve got serious self hatred that youve projected onto women, now you think all women hate you and are out to get you. No you need to love yourself before you see yourself as lovable, because you are, you just need to escape this mindset and focus on the right things.

Nice buzzword waterfall. But it has no bearing on who I am, how I live, or the reality of most men and women in America openly admitting that dating and finding a partner sucks. You can't gaslight the entire world into thinking American dating is totally great and only wierd incels have a problem. Everyone can see its terrible all around. Therapy and using the right terminology won't fix it. Men traveling will at least improve their experiences

Its not a buzzword waterfall its facts. Its funny because the incel playbook is just regurgitating words that incite emotions rather than reflect facts "chad" "stacy" "x pill" all words with no scientific or sociological basis that are tailor made to trigger lonely men's emotions. You are parroting grifters my dude, grifters that make money off of lonely men. Who you are or how you live have no impact on reality, that dating statistically isnt as grim as you make it out to be. That there is no science to back your feelings up. Then there is far more you could do to improve your dating odds, which you reject. Your fragile emotions regarding women do not care about the facts. The fact that you can date, but you don't. The fact that your emotions are being taken advantage of by grifters. The fact you can go outside right now and see average looking dudes dating smokeshows. And the fact that people that share your mindset are causing harm to the world. Read some science and stop getting in your feels, make some change in your life and quit blaming other people. Once again, you are the maker of your own destiny. And if your destiny is that of a weak man who sees himself as stuck with society stacked against him with no way out, then thats weakness. Your weakness, your intrinsic self defeat and preassumed failure, thats why you arent getting laid my dude. Because you believe youve already lost, because grifters told you you already lost and you believed them.

Most people aren't scientists and don't use science in their daily discussions of dating or culture. All your demands for statistics and scientific sources for casual statements about dating sound spergy and insipid. Chad is short hand for tall good looking charismatic popular guy who easily gets women. People don't want to type all of that out every single time so they say Chad. This is how language develops and it's not proof of incel pathology to use or understand what it means. All your walls of text about my inadequacies have no affect on reality whatsoever. You are wasting effort and convincing no one

Ok well i just hope you get better lol

You hope I die a painful slow death, at least be honest

I really don't, I want you to go to therapy

Men in therapy are miserable, broke from the bill, and STILL celibate. Men who travel solve the problem instantly. I wouldn't wish therapy on my worst enemy

the memer's barely disguised fetish

I have a feeling the majority of the commenter's on here are the type of people who see a white guy with literally anyone who isn't a white girl and thinks it's some colonization fetish or incel bullshit 🙄

lol white girls just simply can't stand it when all of the attention is not on them