I am not even a Manlet but these threads always crack me up.

The whole scandal was about non liscenced therapists being on the platform and better help doing no vetting on who's offering services on their platform.

No, that is NOT what their scandals have ever been about.

Your research is laughably bad lol

https://www.newsweek.com/betterhelp-patients-tell-sketchy-therapists-1762849

Also tons and tons of youtube vids you can watch on the topic.

I just read the entire article you linked, nothing in there at all about non licensed therapists being on the platform. Care to quote the relevant section?

I didn't even bother reading it because this is such a widely known controversy I figured I could pick any article. Here's another for you:

The article you linked literally says the opposite of what you claimed. The complaint was that users could not SEE the credentials of the therapist they're seeing, not that the platform is using unlicensed therapists.

Obviously you got a terrible therapist in your anecdote, but how does this connect to criticizing BetterHelp? What do you want them to do, screen providers for their political views or conspiratorial tendencies? How would they even do that? How would something like that even come up when providers sign up to participate in the BetterHelp network?

That's why it's a scam. There's no screening at all. Your personal beliefs should never even come up if you're supposedly a professional.

What do you mean by “screening”? This is never done in the healthcare industry. Do you think BlueCross BlueShield, Aetna, Cigna, or any other traditional health carrier screens their providers? They don't.

What the frick are you talking about. You're telling me that ABSOLUTELY NO ONE in the healthcare industry screens their professionals? This is utter bullshit. You work for BetterHelp don't you?

You don't know what you're talking about. There's no reason for an employer to screen HCP when they're licensed. The screening is done by the regulatory body that does the licensing, and any employer who hires you just has to check to make sure you're licensed and able to practice. Why would they run a full background check or whatever on you? Anything serious that would prevent you from being hired would have resulted in your license being suspended or revoked.

There's plenty reasons for it. But you're so sure about it.

Are therapists predisposed to having mental illnesses?

I've never heard of such a thing. Never heard of any other health carrier screening doctors for mental illness. That seems completely ludicrous.

Therapists for a therapy service not being screened for mental health? I had to fill out a psychological survey to apply at fricking Best Buy.

Doctors don't go through any such screenings when they join provider networks, their qualifications are professional in nature — meaning, that they are accredited providers of the services they perform. This accreditation is not done by any health insurance carriers or provider network administrators. So BetterHelp does not do it in the same way that Blue Cross Blue Shield doesn't do it. Whoever your insurance carrier is, they do not “screen” any doctors that participate in their networks in the matter that you are describing.

You're just saying stuff. Do you have some kind of source on this?

Are you a therapist? What are your credentials? To obtain those credentials you didn't have a psychological screening ever? Wow.

The context is a guy getting hit in the balls by a baseball pitch

!foidmoment

I (47 F) found out that my 7+ year relation was over via FB when I saw pictures of my SO (49 M) on vacation with another woman.

We were long distance starting right before COVID, so we hadn't seen each other in a couple of years.

I was still putting in the effort. He was not.

Apparently, he had decided it was over & just figured I would get the hint if he stopped speaking to me. This was AFTER we had several long conversations about our relationship being basically a marriage without the piece of paper. He thought the piece of paper didn't matter. And, although I agreed, apparently I was the only one who took the commitment seriously.

Anyway, when I confronted him about it, he just ignored me. Go figure. So, I contacted her. She didn't know anything about me, so SHE confronted HIM. They had been together just about 6 months & he hadn't told her anything about me. Although, they had talked about moving in together & getting married, things he & I had agreed we were not quite ready for yet. Apparently , that was just for me.

Cut out the rest of the boring 888 Foid is very surprised that her LDR relationship with a man she hasn't seen in years is over, finds out the new fangled internet way.

She rightly gets pilloried in the comments, leading to some incredible mental gymnastics:

You say you were basically married to someone you hadn't seen in years. There's no such thing. Either you are married or you are not. And not seeing someone for years means you aren't even in a relationship. He didn't tell you because I think most people would gather that.

So, you're saying anyone who doesn't see their significant other for a couple of years & still thinks they have a relationship is stupid? I know a few military families that would beg to differ. Regardless, I gave him repeated opportunities to bow out gracefully, but he assured me everything was fine. Not everyone who has been married before is down for getting married again. I thought that was the agreement. But I guess that was his escape clause. I am upset that he cheated, I won't lie about that. But what really hurt, what made me more sad/angry/betrayed/every other emotion than anything else was being lied to. Being told repeatedly that everything is fine, that there is this future waiting for us, only to find out that the first opportunity he got, he took, and still reassured me that everything was fine.

Mega cope jfc

Still coping as of three hours ago:

Seriously though. Honey, you're young & you have yet to meet all the men who are going to piss you off. Eventually, you'll find the right one who will piss you off about the right things. It will make sense later. Hopefully he's good looking & has a nice butt. Long distance is hella hard. I was a sailor and a Navy wife and just ended a 7 year relationship because we were long distance for a couple of years, thanks COVID, and I found out via FB that he had been cheating. But I digress. Long distance is hard. Even for the strongest of relationships. I don't know how long y'all have been together, but this doesn't bode well for your relationship once you're separated by miles & not just a few hours of work. You're going to be in a new place, experiencing new things, meeting new people. Do you really want to be saddled with a lame boyfriend who chose hiking with the guys over you on your last weekend when you're meeting new "people"? Just remember, be safe, take care of you, wear sunscreen, make him wear a condom & always have $ for an Uber

This post is basically a figleaf to try out the newfangled redditor harassment tech, so /u/lagx777 please join and elaborate further

Had this sent to me a hundred times yesterday, held off til more details came out.

Now that they have, what should the punishment be for this girl who blatantly lied & sewered a small business in hopes of going viral?

wtf is wrong with this world?https://t.co/FHXHC5ktic

— Dante (@DanteTheDon) March 14, 2024

She's nuked all her socials already.

Bar's TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@hubbardinnchicago/video/7345947161005133102

Reddit discussions:

https://old.reddit.com/r/chicago/comments/1bes198/hubbard_inn_responds_to_tiktokers_allegation_of/

https://old.reddit.com/r/ImTheMainCharacter/comments/1bf44vp/hubbard_inn_responds_to_morons_allegations_of/

https://old.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/comments/1bf1wgx/to_lie_about_being_pushed_down_the_stairs_by_bar/

https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1beu34j/hubbard_inn_responds_to_tiktokers_allegation_of/

OP is not only a Leaf hooker, they're a janny for Canadian hooker subs

(OP said she thought she was asexual until she discovered that her mother had her fun button removed.)

Selected comments:

I'm asexual, don't have s*x, and I am still a successful person doing a lot with my life so I don't think it's the end of the world

Yeah sis, someone having her clit dug out with a rusty spoon is totally fine because s*x doesn't matter to you personally

I mean, first of all, an Ace person wouldn't be upset at all about not being able to feel sexual pleasure.

I'd love to not feel anything. I find it to be an inconvenience that comes with my body, rather than a good thing.

The clitlet actually apologized for upsetting this person, lmao

You likely are asexual. A woman's clitoris is much much more than the bump up top, the nerves curl all the way around the vaginal opening down to around the anus.

Reddit psychologists

There's also a few slapfights about circumcision dotted around the thread.

No comment from Kensington Palace tonight after at least 3 international pictures agencies refuse to distribute this morning’s photo of Kate and her children. Some of them (@AP ) have claimed “the source [the palace] has manipulated the image”. pic.twitter.com/ppOwDtPr9P

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 10, 2024

!britbongs @BussyBoy

People were already sus about the photo this morning

NEW: A photograph of Kate has just been released by Kensington Palace for Mother’s Day (in the UK).
It was taken by Prince William in Windsor earlier this week in order to thank everyone for their support while the Princess of Wales has been recovering from her abdominal surgery. pic.twitter.com/4Si7PRq4Q6

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 10, 2024

By confirmed dead, I mean a car crash has been scheduled in a Paris tunnel.

Twitter foids seem really into this so let's see how gay this website really is.

Context: Dr. Charlotte Proudman is a gigafeminist known for her hot takes, including:

• A message to pregnant women — please give the baby your surname.

• The only person of colour in the royal family isn't present because Meghan Markle was bullied out.

• Harry Potter is a little patriarch that resorts to magic & violence to rule.

Today, she has launched a campaign to change the law so that moids have to prove a foid consented when defending an accusation of r*pe. In her own words:

It would put the onus on defendants to show how she consented, if she wanted to have s*x, if she was asked if she wanted to have s*x, what steps did she take to make sure that she was wanting to have s*x and was enthusiastic about it.

Proudman (who I have personally diagnosed as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder) decided to make herself the face of the campaign, producing this wonderful poster:

The slogan itself has become a point of contention:

https://x.com/BiFelicia319/status/1765044078897471864

https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910

https://x.com/Daisy_J_S/status/1765096615352959472

https://x.com/LizMaryWard/status/1765065360271888644

https://x.com/beesley_cathy/status/1765059359447330969

https://x.com/jessothomson/status/1765080110141722910

Selected comments:

This is obviously r-slurred, but naturally there are some male feminists arguing against their own self-interest

Why do you think this switches the burden of proof to the accused?

Because that's literally what she said it does?

The criminalisation of basic human behaviour continues.

I'm 30, there are only a handful of times the woman actually said ‘let's have s*x'

Which 'basic human behaviour' are you referring to, coercing women into s*x?

That Redditor should be arrested for not getting the consent forms signed!

I feel that these sorts of things are proposed in bad faith to make feminists look ridiculous.

Feminists would never say something completely r-slurred unless they were plants.

Really cool stuff happens when you google your name pic.twitter.com/gOr043HXhW

— Liv (@Liv_Agar) March 4, 2024

BECAUSE YOU ARE VISIBLE FROM SPACE:

Finding plump foids attractive is a crime: