she clarifies later down that he didn't actually say he loved her, just "things that felt like I love you"

Ewer, 28, showed an unhealthy interest in her student that was noticed almost "immediately" after she started working at Brady Exploration School in August 2023, the DA Office's investigation revealed.

In November 2023, after the boy hinted at an improper relationship with Ewer in a classroom assignment that another teacher saw, authorities at the school contacted the Lakewood Police Department.

They soon uncovered evidence of a disturbing sexual relationship between the pair, including explicit text messages and signs that drugs, guns and alcohol had been introduced, per prosecutors.

Thousands upon thousands upon thousands" of messages were sent by Ewer to her student and vice versa, with references to many sexual encounters, according to prosecutors.

Ewer introduced the teenager to illegal and deadly drugs including fentanyl, First Judicial District Attorney's Office Special Victims Prosecutor Brynn Chase told her sentencing hearing.

She also attempted to get the boy to bring a gun to their sexual encounters as well as shoot a fellow faculty member in their school, the sentencing hearing heard.

Ewer told the boy "to bring the gun to school and shoot another faculty member in the leg," Chase said at the hearing.

Average dimwit American (aka teacher's) understanding of firearm usage

Ewer was sentenced to four years in jail on January 31, after pleading guilty last November to sexual assault on a child and contributed to the delinquency of a minor, both felonies, a month before her trial was due to start.

"I'm really sorry; this will never happen again," she said, as per the office.

Probably because nobody will let you around the 'tarded kids anymore

Before her brief spell there, Ewer had worked at several Jefferson County public schools in various roles, including teaching assistant, paraprofessional, and school nurse, since 2015.

@Redactor0 @BrasilIguana @Gaydinosaurtrain @SCUM !historychads decided to just go ahead and make a post.

Despite Japan being closed to outsiders during the Edo period between 1603 to 1868, they still had some idea of the outside world. One interesting case was what they knew about the fledgling country of America. The following is a collection of different pages from a book about America's history called Osanaetoki Bankokubanashi written in 1861. After doing some digging it seems like this book was in earnest, it believed what it had written, taking its sources from two other books about America.

Here is George Washington (with bow and arrow) pictured alongside the Goddess of America.

Here is Christopher Columbus (seated at center) reporting his discovery of America to Queen Isabella of Spain.

Now it's the American Revolution. Here is George Washington defending his wife "Carol" from a British official named "Asura" (same characters as the Buddhist deity).

And here is Washington's "second-in-command" John Adams battling an enormous snake.

Here is Washington and his wife "Carol" meeting an extremely youthful Benjamin Franklin, who has an impressive squat.

Here's the incredibly jacked Benjamin Franklin firing a cannon that he holds in his bare hands, while John Adams directs him where to fire.

And here is George Washington straight-up punching a tiger.

Best buds John Adams and Ben Franklin must have had a falling out, because John Adams fires an arrow at Ben and then rides away like a cowardly little b-word. Of course Ben Franklin is a total badass, so he just stands there and lets the arrow fly by without even flinching.

During a calmer moment, John Adams is just chillin' in the countryside, having a quiet picnic with his elderly mother...

But then! While John Adams is too obsessed with the food and drink, a huge snake comes along and eats his mom!

Maybe the snake was a child of that other snake John Adams killed, or maybe it was sent by Ben Franklin as part of their feud?

Here is Washington leading his army from behind in a carriage. The American flag has no stars, only stripes, and the author seems very impressed that the carriage has not one but TWO horses.

Meanwhile, John Adams wants to get revenge on the snake that ate his Mom , so he goes to ask a magical mountain fairy for help!

The mountain fairy does Adams a solid, and summons a gigantic eagle!

Together, John Adams and the eagle kill the enormous snake that ate his Mom. The power of teamwork!!!

So that's it, really interesting blend between a modern idea like the US and more mythical storytelling. Reads a lot like tales of Alexander the Great or of bible characters like David. Cool illustrations too. There are more pages, but I can't find any translation, despite them looking very interesting. Here's the whole book: https://archive.wul.waseda.ac.jp/kosho/bunko11/bunko11_a0380/bunko11_a0380_0002/bunko11_a0380_0002.html

oh you’re non-binary? that’s interesting…

computers operate on a binary system—every piece of technology you use runs on 1s and 0s

DNA is built on base pairs—adenine only pairs with thymine, cytosine only pairs with guanine

electrical circuits are binary—on or off, current…

— stepfanie tyler (@wildbarestepf) February 11, 2025

!transphobes begin purge

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

He hates Philly. I hope the Eagles win by a landslide. (7681)

So far so good (617)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

He totally called out the election being rigged, having a black uncle Sam and telling America they picked the wrong one. Think he did pretty good speaking out. (511)

Wait when'd he do the other stuff beside have Sam Jackson do the intro (4)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

If this were Biden, I'm sure he'd have a few things to say (12)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Weeeeeeeell Donald Trump is a b-word- he's a big fat b-word He is the Biggest b-word in the whole wide worldHe's a stupid b-word- if there ever was a bitchHe's b-word to all the boys and girlsOn Monday, he's a b-word- on Tuesday he's a bitchOn Wednesday to Saturday- she's a bitchThen on Sunday, just to be different- she's a Super King Kamehameha bi-atch!Come on, you know the words! (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I would call him a bag or shit, but i can nourish soil with shit, so ill go with a bag of puke…that just kills anything and is absolutely worthless. And that salute during the anthem…tool. (5)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I get that a little less than half of the country doesn't like him, but can we stop it with the "convicted felon" bullshit? It's obvious that he committed a crime-- so did, probably, every politician, Congressman, businessman, or executive of any standing ever. There are thousands of state and federal code violations on the books and we all know that Trump was only nailed because there was political motivation to do so. The same reason the Republicans had political motivation to go after Hunter Biden.Continuing along this weak (and apparently unpersuasive line of logic, by the fact he was still elected) only serves to discredit your attempts to criticize this man. (5)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/phillygirllovesbagel

Score: 🐮🔘🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 2

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡🔘🔘🔘

Minimum angriness: 😡🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

Other stuff I guess

He hardcoded API tokens

• Implemented .env file with dotenv

Logs growing too large

• Configured log rotation, and a cap on log size, etc

API failures & retries

• Increased timeout and added retry logic

Database locking issues

• Optimized database queries for better concurrency

!marseyartists !saiyans Can you guess who it is?

Right, there's nothing productive to be had in terms of discussion here, and I don't think you guys even care at this point either to try.

Call it whatever stupid buzzword you want - Woke, DEI, PC, SJW, or whatever dumb term people come up with next week. I don't care. The term means, always has meant, and always WILL mean "Not being an butthole to someone because they're different to you."

Don't pretend that the old stories were fine just having black or gay people - Because buttholes complained about that then, just like you are complaining about it now. The reality is, people who are not the same skin colour, sexual orientation, gender, lifestyle, size, physical ability, etc etc, than you, Exist. They always have, and always will.

Culture including people with different characteristics to you IS NOT A SLIGHT. They are not doing it to offend you, or to "gaslamp you" or whatever nonsense the Anti Woke Brigade has come up with this week. These characters are being created so that the real human beings who have those differences, have someone to look at and go "Hey this guy's like me!" That's it. That's the whole thing. It's just about making everybody feel welcome.

If you want to complain about this, I encourage you to send us a modmail. But this thread is locked, and you know darn well why.

Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.

Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.

🇺🇸🇺🇦‼️🚨 Trump destroys Zelensky:

Reporter: “Will you support Ukraine and the exchange of territories, which includes the Kursk region?”

Trump: “Zelensky will have to do what he has to do and his ratings are not very good.” pic.twitter.com/t7iDE2rMBV

— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) February 13, 2025

Update: got sent home. Am waiting for my connection at Kowloon Tong. Never usually see the MTR after 8.30am or before 6pm.

Wikipedia's "talk" page on the Gulf of Mexico/America/Cuba/Florida has been in an uproar the past few weeks because of 's EO to change its name. Some highlights:

If the international groups such as the United Nations group of experts on geographical names (meeting in April), the International Maritime Organisation and the International Hydrographic Organization opt-in to recognising the U.S. owned portion of the gulf as the Gulf of America, then I agree that we should concede to the name. Somejeff (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

To both sides of this "question", this entire discussion is moot, since the moment Donald Trump leaves office the next President of the United States will immediately reverse the name-change order. The Gulf of Mexico will remain The Gulf of Mexico so long as modern human society endures. Looneybunny (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

We should call it the Gulf of the Olmecs since they were there first

Google just announced there changing it on their maps Bamaboi445 (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Google is not Wikipedia. Accuratelibrarian (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

You had no problem with President Obama changing the name from Mount McKinley to Denali it's over if that's what president Trump wants that's what he gets you can still go on to Google maps and this nonsense on here Wikipedia and I still got to hear the same bullshit if it's good for the goose it's good for the gander it changes and it needs to be changed now today not yesterday because you don't like trump it don't matter I voted for Obama I voted for that change I didn't like that Mount McKinley got changed him out Denali but because I voted for it happened it going to happen fight it love it leave it it does not matter it's changing and we're not going to stop until it does 65.102.184.179 (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

In case editors don't realize, usage of this name has already begun: "an area of low pressure moving across the Gulf of America, interacting with Arctic air, will bring widespread impactful winter weather to North Florida, etc." StAnselm (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

That "source" is from the POLICTICAL OFFICE of a well-known extremist right-wing supporter of Donald Trump. It is not a reliable, nor independent source, and therefore should be discounted Looneybunny (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

I don't see why a mention would be a problem considering the fact that American schools (and media) will soon be teaching it as the Gulf of America. Jstewart2007 (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Also, the moment Donald Trump leaves office the next President of the United States, (who will, considering recent events, most assuredly be a Democrat), will reverse the order, and the "Gulf of America" will vanish as quickly as it appeared, just another example of exactly why Donald Trump was the worst pick for President in American history. Looneybunny (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

This Looneybunny person has posted similar comments on multiple reply chains even if it is questionably relevant

Seriously, how long are the admins going to drag their feet on an official government change? Regardless of whether people like it or not the Government of the U.S. as well as major state and private institutions will refer to it as the Gulf of America going forward unless the change is reversed. The title of the article doesn't have to change but the intro to the page should at the very least include "also known as the Gulf of America in the United States" and there should be a new page on the dispute itself like the pages for the disputes around names of the Persian Gulf and Sea of Japan respectively, instead of relegating it to two clearly tacked paragraphs at the end of the etymology section. No one else outside of the Koreas calls the Sea of Japan the "East Sea" but the article intro still recognizes the dispute's existence, why isn't this any different? Syracuse58 (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Because it's Drumpf silliness and not something that has to be indulged here. Among all the other reasons given. Acalamari 02:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I think we're going to be stuck fielding whatabouts from the people who erroneously believe that the United States should be allowed to rewrite reality like O'Brien from 1984 for a very long time if we don't start aggressively clerking this page. An RfC generally has a shelf-life of minimum six months. Can we please have a moratorium on discussions of American nicknames for the Gulf of Mexico for the next six months so that we have the clarity of consensus necessary to clerk these repetitive arguments promptly? Simonm223 (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

The nonsense is from those fighting so hard to pretend like the American government doesn't have the authority to name things. It's hilarious to see how quickly Wikipedians tripped over themselves to change Mount McKinley to Denali, and how hard they're ignoring the same arguments to change it back, same with this page. Ortizesp (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Funnily enough, although both the Gulf of Mexico and Denali name change were part of the same EO, Denali's wikipedia page intro has already been changed to include the tagline "Denali, federally designated as Mount McKinley"

Oppose, see the example of Clingmans Dome, which was changed by Wikipedia the very same day Biden changed it. Funnily, all these scruples about COMMONNAME and all those "voices of concern" were nowhere to be seen. XavierItzm (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

This is a comment for the RFC that isn't open right now. Comparing a relatively obscure mountain in Tennessee to an internationally important body of water isn't doing this argument any favors, politically motivated or otherwise. Departure– (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

We should rename the Atlantic Ocean to the American Ocean so that people stop worrying about the gulf name change since then it wouldn't be as big of a deal.

Strong Support It is important to address the elephant in the room here: There is a strong liberal bias on Wikipedia. By comparison, the Obama administration changed the name of Mount McKinley to Denali in 2015, and the Wikipedia editors were almost tripping over themselves trying to make the name change from Mount McKinley to Denali. I understand that the Gulf of Mexico is a different case in that the Gulf of Mexico is not entirely within the borders of the United States, as Denali/Mount McKinley is, but I think that at the very least the president's executive order must warrant changing the title to: "Gulf of Mexico, officially the Gulf of America in the United States." To me, any opposition to simply noting that it is officially called the Gulf of America in the U.S. is bald-faced activism protesting the name change more than it is actually rooted in reason, evidence, and consistency across articles. U.S. Federal Agencies will henceforth be referring to it as the Gulf of America. If someone sees the name Gulf of America on a U.S. Federal map and enters it into Wikipedia, they'll need to scroll down to the middle of the page and read a paragraph buried in the article containing irrelevant information such as a comedian Stephen Colbert's comments on the name to try to make sense of why they're seeing Gulf of America on a map. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia designed to transmit information; activism and bias should be discouraged. (For evidence of such activism and bias, just look at the opposing comments above describing this as a "stunt"; yet no one ever described Obama's name change from McKinley to Denali as a "stunt." Such opposing positions are not rooted in reason, only bias and activism.) Ambrosiaster (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

This really is the essence of false balance. "We shouldn't call something Trump does a stunt, unless we can also describe something unrelated that Obama did as a stunt." (We can unpack the facts if you like, but this isn't the Denali page; it's the Gulf of Mexico page.) Things can be qualitatively different from each other. Describing different things with different terms isn't bias, it's analysis. And sometimes the analysis can quite validly (if informally) be 'yeah, that's a stunt'. Biden claiming to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment was also a stunt. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

NB: The above user is currently blocked from editing in the main space, as a sanction for having edit warred on the Gulf of Mexico article. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Correct. And the editors who were warring to include comments from comedian Stephen Colbert and to revert the changes with even more frequency than me were not temporarily blocked from editing. Further evidence of bias and activism. Thanks for pointing that out. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

That's an interesting linguistic tic you've got there, always pairing "bias and activism". GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Still waiting on that analysis you alluded to in your prior post. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Nope. I mentioned that it's possible, which it is. I'm not here to perform for you; your own biases are showing. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Figured that would be your response. Ambrosiaster (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Support in a way its very similar to Deadnaming if the federal government wants it to be Gulf of America then that is what it should be called. Did we have this type of vote when Ellen Page changed her bame to Elliot? I know its not a human but it still applies here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fruitloop11 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You mean his name'. And no it's not, because Eliot Page is the leading authority on what his own name is - it's within his power to choose it, and he did. He is, in fact, the individual affected. Neither the President of the USA, nor the US government generally, are the Gulf of Mexico, nor do they own or control it. It's international waters, and it is beyond the power of any arm of the US government to change its name unilaterally - even in common usage within the USA, never mind globally. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You are so terrified, I can tell your hands start shaking every time you type. The fact is it WILL be changed you need to stop harassing all support voters. Imagine if someone was allowed to harass you while you voted Harris, which you 100% did. Even another user has warned you to stop Fruitloop11 (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from personal attacks. You are wrong about my voting, for a reason that should be apparent upon reflection. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm literally about to report you for harassment. the admins will see user:Wildfireupdateman giving you a warning and the harassment you made against User:Ambrosiaster user:AnotherWeatherEditor and many others. and no, I will not call Ellen Page Elliot Page until you stop bothering people. Fruitloop11 (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome to try. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia Jannies hid this one in spoilered text simply titled "Enough."

Thank you. This user's engagement certainly veers more on mud-slinging than it does on civil discourse in my opinion as well: (1) She told me I have a linguistic tic and (2) She tried to undermine my position by claiming that I had a very temporary ban for an edit war. She is free to reason through it, but she is mostly engaging in name-calling and attempting to shame the support voters. Ambrosiaster (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

I knew before I posted she was going to reply to me, so I was on the defense. I think anyone will see this person isn't using the discussion board the way it is intended. It's all about bullying someone who doesn't have the views as you. Fruitloop11 (talk) 16:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

This strikes me as in line with Facebook's actions of lightening censorship and Twitter's actions of existing past 2022 of trying to be in line with the new Trump government because if I'm not mistaken they're facing a pretty serious federal anti-trust lawsuit. What shows up in Google maps does not necessarily reflect what is in common usage. Departure– (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

You do understand that this is merely a question of entering in the lead ", officially Gulf of America in the United States," not to change the title wholesale. As pointed out earlier, the moment that the Obama admin changed the name Mt McKinley to Denali, liberal Wikipedia editors changed it forthwith and added the hashtag #ThanksObama! Common usage was moot at that time because everyone knows that the common used term was Mount McKinley, not Denali. But now all of a sudden common usage returns to the forefront. Ambrosiaster (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

In sum, stop treating common usage as a dispositive factor. It was not dispositive for Mount McKinley, and in that case, the entire article name was changed—a much more drastic measure than is being proposed here. Ambrosiaster (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:No personal attacks: "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Better read up the policy. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Gotitbro (talk) 04:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

I hope that is not directed at me. Defining someone who posted #ThanksObama in the edit line of the Denali article as a liberal is a personal attack? Read the link I shared above: While redirecting the Mt McKinley article to Denali, an editor inserted the political line into the edit #ThanksObama. That to me is far less neutral and inappropriate than me defining such an individual as a liberal. Certainly a conservative didn't write #ThanksObama. No one was attacked personally here. Ambrosiaster (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Is Ambrosiaster Wikipedia's biggest ?

Bonus: The Denali Wikipedia talk page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Denali

Opppose (changing the name back to McKinley on the website) per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRYSTAL. This move request is premature and entirely based on a political maneuver that likely is not going to affect the common nomenclature of the mountain. Its status among governmental figures is not relevant to the article's name. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

In the above discussions, it's been made clear that both are common names. If "McKinley" is the name that the government and Associated Press are going to use, it should be given precedence as the title. Derpytoucan (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Are the majority of reliable sources going to follow the federal government and the Associated Press? Is every publication that adopts the AP stylebook going to discard Denali completely? It's too soon to tell, and we shouldn't react on the spur of the moment. XOR'easter (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

How many times is the goalpost of "well not ALL RS call it McKinley" going to be moved over the next four years? There's already a precedent that's been set when the article was renamed in 2015. If McKinley is a common name, and its the name that the federal government and Associated Press are going to be using, it should be the article's title. I'm fine with waiting until the Secretary of the Interior has actually made the name change official, and perhaps seeing how other RS call the mountain when reporting on that event, but implying that we need to wait any longer to rename the article is absurd, especially given the aforementioned instant renaming in 2015.Derpytoucan (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Stop WP:BLUDGEONing the discussion. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't see this as bludgeoning. @Derpytoucan makes a good point. anikom15 (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Repeatedly replying to multiple commenters is textbook BLUDGEON. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Talk about projection because that's exactly what you're doing. Esotericmadman (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Bonus bonus: The edit page for the Gulf of Mexico webpage:

106 edits in the last 24 hours alone

I've always believed that Wikipedia is a goldmine for drama and petty squabbles between self-centered know-it-alls, but I usually can't care to look into it because I find the layout of their website atrocious.

!ifuckinglovescience what is the scientific consensus?

shilling s, a youtube channel, and chris chan.

back in my day we had REAL WRASSLIN' SIGNS

[tumblr_ndppwag1mj1qm9odpo1_500-1416127163.avif]

eddie was mexican but i'm sure i don't have to tell you that everyone knows dead wrasslers

edit: why didn't that first pic work is it just me it's the RODDY HAS AIDS sign

is it gonna work this time does rdrama just hate stuff saved from tumblr

I completely misremembered the Bill T-shirt joke and now I'm a day off

NFL had their little award show/NFL Honors + Hall of Fame inductees. Sterling Sharpe is in the HoF now.

Previous Threads: week 18/MVP/Regular Season threads, Wildcard, Divisional, Conference Champs. There are 2 bets left pending the SB results.

Sunday 6:30 PM Eastern Time

Enter BetKansas City Chiefs - 436 bets

Enter BetPhiladelphia Eagles - 450 bets - WINNER!

Enter BetDon't Click This - 117 bets

pings: !mensfootball !goomble !goomblers !bets @BILLYBIGBOLLOCKS @Freak-Off @Drippo @SpudsMackenzie

more betting: https://rdrama.net/post/340823/real-superbowl-betting-thread-for-real

closed

PREVIOUSLY: https://rdrama.net/h/slackernews/post/254464/ceo-of-data-privacy-company-onerepcom

The data privacy company Onerep.com bills itself as a Virginia-based service for helping people remove their personal information from almost 200 people-search websites. However, an investigation into the history of onerep.com finds this company is operating out of Belarus and Cyprus, and that its founder has launched dozens of people-search services over the years.

KING KREBS

https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/113980130896539182

https://www.mozzarella.org/en-US/about/legal/terms/subscription-services/

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/03/mozzarella-drops-onerep-after-ceo-admits-to-running-people-search-networks/

Oh boy oh gee willikers Braveman. Another week another Furryfox is fricking shit-tier garbage post lmfao

Go on Mozzarellacels, do it https://brave.com/download/

1. "not every white character has to be played by black people..." "Athena isn't white, she doesn't exist"

Soy Pole is back

2. "the same people who like this also hated Gods of Egypt" "Athena isn't white"

3. "she never existed, y'all complain about anything..." "R-slur"

4. "I wanna see Disney do a modern Tarzan film wink, wink"

5. "I think the mafia is behind this blackening up' these European historical movies" words, words, words "Niqqer"

6. posts Shiieett meme "Lol you mad" "your race is useless"

This dude causes some seethe lol and then a random man and woman get into an unrelated argument in the comment chain

7. "my girlfriend and I play BINGO when we watch movies to see how many gay, black, trans, etc there is in the movie" "that's a little odd..."

Reminds me of this:

He couldn’t suppress his retardation any longer.

Now Ukraine can win without the US, good then!

Why all the drama then? They should win on their own, like a proper sovereign country. pic.twitter.com/i7wKmFCYlK

— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) February 13, 2025

Some Ukrainians 🇺🇦 have been posting, “Oh, how I hate America” lately. I wonder what happened? https://t.co/3ixgRBZdA9 pic.twitter.com/4D7URtEL64

— Nina 🐙 Byzantina (@NinaByzantina) February 13, 2025

Neighbors told you before that at one point khohols will hate burgers more than Russian

And suddenly

‼️🇺🇦🇷🇺 50% of Ukrainians FOR ceding Ukrainian lands to Russia to end hostilities , — The Telegraph

▪️As the publication writes, this means a frozen conflict in which Russia gets most or all of the 14% of Ukrainian territory it has conquered since 2022, as pic.twitter.com/QAtSLfXyJy

— Rajendran (@Rajendr67215893) February 13, 2025

50% Ukrainian are ok to give up on land. All those epic Nazi battalion are now filthy rich and don't give a frick about this conflict and those who legit believed in Crimea is Ukraine had long time ago their chance to fight for it.

But biggest surprise is that Zelenskyy is double down

Zelensky refused to sign the agreement on rare earth metals

The Ukrainian president had hoped for a personal meeting with Trump to discuss a "broad vision of the world," but instead he was offered a "financial deal." pic.twitter.com/ojF9rVn1c7

— Sprinter Observer (@SprinterObserve) February 13, 2025

He told no to Trump and did first steep to mobilise 18 years old so dude is ready to fight till last Ukrainian

Funny that this became fake news in regards to when republicans and Trump told last 3 months for Zelenskyy to lower mobilisation age they didn't expected him to do it, their goal was to show that Zelenskyy can't win and will only sacrifice Ukraine future. Also this is a super unpopular action. Most people didn't liked previous mobilisation age downgrade from 27 to 25 and now it's to 18 so a lot of moms will be angry.

That's why Trump told today that Zelenskyy ratings looking very bad.

So as you see a guy from a country where during martial law only parliamentary elections is cancelled and parliament picks the president (remember in 2014 how they picked a president during martial law). That guy cancel all those rules and now doesn't have popular support really doesn't look good.

Soon operation remove Zelenskyy will start

@Szia_uram how is your hero doing ? I still remember how you were telling me he won't remove Zaluzhnyy

stol from https://instagram.com/p/DF68vLTR5_l/

Context: So, as you might know, the Drumpf administration offered a severance package to all 2 million federal workers to entice them to quit. This offer was sent out by some of Elon's flunkies that were recently employed by the Office of Personel Management. After this email, there have been several follow-up messages listing some questions and answers about the program.

Someone got the idea to respond to one of the emails asking more questions, and were automatically put on the list to be shitcanned.

Now to the comments:

Someone at our org CC'ed their supervisor on their resignation response and the supervisor got added to the list

Hahaha holy shit.

"Oh Mr. supervisor, I've just quit my job and it looks like I quit your job too. No takebacks."

Shocking that a bunch of clownfarts with no experience managing large organizations would make such a mistake.

Do you really think it's a mistake?

I had an out of office message…. Uhm… 😐

This whole thing has been hold and we don't even know if it will be allowed . But the drama coin is already being paid out. !fedposters

Really elucidating (and depressing) read, Matt Christman's fate really is a fitting metaphor for the dirtbag left. The movement ultimately went nowhere with all its personalities either fading into obscurity or chudding out like A+D, forever trapped in the mind prison of "what if Bernie got elected?"

The landlord stuff is especially depressing, it's pretty clear by now that leftism correlates heavily with personal and financial administrative incompetence, but the fact that these people make six figures a month and are still renting + faux seething about their landlord (clearly for their loser audience) in their 30s really boggles the mind.

I think in the end the dirtbag left, with it's airs of cold cynicism, realpolitik and class analysis will be remembered as naive and unsophisticated.

Wanna specify with this I'm absolutely not making fun of/gloating about Matt Christman here, I wouldn't wish anyone (especially with a family) to go through that.

Looking good, queen!

Chuds why do you hate America? Why do you hate the constitution? What did James Madison ever do to you that you hate his work so much?

The 10th Amendment establishes the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine, this is that the federal government cannot force or order states to expend resources for federal functions. SCOTUS first established it in Prigg v. Pennsylvania when they found the federal government could not force states to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act. The '97 landmark case of Printz v. United States was the most recent case they affirmed the doctrine and solidified its current form.

The federal government cannot force states to spend on enforcing federal laws. Immigration laws suffer a double blow because its also exclusive federal jurisdiction, states are not permitted to regulate immigration.

This is settled law. The bimbo is being r-slurred, and she hates America.

Whenvever I log on the chat seems to be filled with indoctrinated teen Americans/bots regurgitating far-right propaganda from social media; why is this not moderated?

A lot of what is said would be classed as incitement to racial hatred which is a criminal act so I find it strange this is allowed on a public chat. This isn't Twitter and I find it a bit disgusting the developers don't prevent their game being used as an indoctrination tool for the far-right.

Mechabellum is a moderately entertaining auto battler created by a small Chinese developer. There is a "global chat" that anyone can talk in and it's a completely unmoderated free for all, so as you'd expect it's basically an Xbox Live lobby from 2006. Almost everyone just ignores it. This causes occasionally sneed on the subreddit.