I shall not rest until every man, woman, and child has been hanged and political peace has been restored.

!chuds !nonchuds

It was about 30k usd including everything (Design, titanium implant manufacturing, surgery, hospital stay etc.)

Next up is bimax, genio and jaw angle implants. But, I'm also planning on getting a few soft tissue adjustments and potentially limb lengthening in the future.

Yes, the surgery was quite long by itself, it would be too dangerous to combine the two.

Sure. Spend 30k to shape your skull so some foid will love you.

How long till drugmaxxing where you start to move drugs beocuse you get best kitty that way

Other users there are saying he got strabismus. Its thing where one of your eye looks in other direction. Imagine spending 30k to look like goofball

I hate p-dophiles so fricking much I cannot put it into words GOD FRICKING DAMMIT

Somehow a misconception seems to be spreading that I'm a furry. I am NOT a furry.

Proof:

1. I am not gay

2. Girls can't be furries

3. I am an anti-furry

4. I am an actual animal (vulptex)

5. I'm not a libtard

6. I'm asexual and aromantic

7. I don't watch porn

That is all.

A cuck

It's his wife with her new boyfriend

Since I haven’t seen many others saying this, I’m going to. Given the pep, energy, clarity and calm we saw in President Biden, late Friday morning, I would hope that someone (like maybe Dr. Jill Biden) start demanding to know who was in the chain of custody between anything he…

— Jack Hopkins (@thejackhopkins) June 30, 2024

"Chevron has proved to be fundamentally misguided."

"Experience has also shown that Chevron is unworkable." pic.twitter.com/ubc297hivO

— Rob Romano (@2Aupdates) June 28, 2024

The Chevron doctrine stems from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984). It established a legal test for determining when courts should defer to a federal agency's interpretation of a statute that it administers. The doctrine involves a two-step process:

Step One: The court asks whether the statute's language is clear and unambiguous regarding the issue at hand. If it is, the court must follow the statute's plain meaning.

Step Two: If the statute is ambiguous, the court then considers whether the agency's interpretation is "reasonable" or "permissible." If the agency's interpretation meets this standard, the court defers to the agency's expertise.

This doctrine recognizes the expertise and policy-making prerogatives of administrative agencies and allows them to fill in the details of broad legislative frameworks.

TLDR: fed agencies can't make up rules

Fricked another chick. This time I did it while my parents were at a dinner party or something.

She wanted to leave afterwards and didn't cuddle because I think she was wierded out because I drank a post-s*x protein shake (i had a pump so I didn't want to waste my anabolic window).

Ama

https://old.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/comments/1dq8v7f/if_trump_wins_the_presidential_election_im/

Would you be willing to sacrifice our """democracy""" if it means a lot of redditors will an hero? I think we all know the answer.