- 4
- 22
I need DC asap because the casino is fricking rigged, so you're getting a movie review! This movie is like two years old now and I still think about it to this day, not because of the pornographic scene, but because of the storyline.
The whole idea behind the movie is that a 30 year old dommie-mommie is broke asl and needs to pay property taxes to keep her mom's house. Instead of selling it off, she wants to keep it because of the NOSTALGIA o algo. To get the money, she finds a craigslist offer about a family who's giving away a car for a hot single in their area to "date" their son. The whole reason behind this is that their son is an incel (not a he-man woman hater incel) and they want to get him used to socializing before he's sent off to college. After this, the movie is mostly comedic filler that doesn't really expand on the story, but is still fun to watch. She goes to the place that the son is working at (as the parents don't want him to know it's all staged) and tries seducing him. I forgot how it happens but she ends up getting him in some van and he pepper-sprays her thinking she's going to r*pe him (friggin sweet!). The only other memorable part is the scene on the beach where they go skinny dipping for some reason, a group of teens steal their clothes and a NAKED JENNIFER LAWRENCE beats the shit out of them. After that she tries having s*x with the incel but he refuses, so she then steals HIS clothes and tries to drive off which results in him jumping on her (borrowed) car and fighting for some reason. The scene is both funny and arousing (to me at least). I also now permanently associate Maneater with this scene, which is somewhat nice.
Later in the movie, the incel finds true love and ALMOST has s*x with someone who wasn't trying to use him, but SHE ends up barging in and ending anything that was going on between them. The next day, the incel overhears his parents conversing with the MC about how she needs to convince him to go to college and not stay with the actual love of his life. In a fit of rage, he calls over his groomercord buddy to crash the reward car and tries to scam her into having s*x. He ends up prematurely ejaculating because WHO WOULDN'T? The movie then becomes boring as they retract from the main point about the incel and go back to the MC's useless self-inflicted issue about paying off the house. She decides to sell the house and move to California because her friends are moving away too and this makes her start to think if soying over nostalgia is actually productive to her life.
This movie did have it's own fair share of drama (albeit wasn't that big) where the film was accused of normalizing grooming.
Xhe almost has a point, the part where it falls flat though is that I would be happy to be in his position.
During the whole movie, I felt a huge connection with this dude. I suggest giving it a watch if you're ever in need of a laugh/feeling down/feeling romantical.
- 4
- 17
Yes it's true, I get social anxiety when I try to order a coffee at Starbucks, and I spend almost all my time writing on social media about how I want to achieve brutal revenge against everyone who disagrees with my political views. But the truth is, women don't like me because I'm slightly unattractive. I don't know if this is actually true, since I don't talk to women, but I have an entire folder of infographics explaining that women only want to have s*x with jacked 6'7" billionaires.
- 29
- 98
Thread theme btw if anyone knows more Chappell Roan songs like this let me know, I love this song
When Kennedy ran for President in 2024, he was a joke. The very weird failson of a famous dead politician throwing a strange tantrum because Joe Biden was too pro-vaccine. His announcement speech in 2023 would get taken down by YouTube because of his strange rants about vaccines, and the Brandonslide in the Democratic primaries was too powerful to be stopped - Kennedy couldn't stop Biden, Phillips couldn't stop Biden, Williamson couldn't stop Biden, not even my GOAT Jason Palmer could stop Biden.
Remeber this? That was so awesome. Anyway, Kennedy was a weird joke like Marianne Williamson or Dean Phillips - until he announced he was going to run third party, then he became a very serious threat. His early polls were incredible - some (obviously bollocks ones) were at 15%, and he was generally polled at around 8% - 10% near the start of his run. Of course, fate would not smile upon RFK. After a graveyard shaped closet was unleashed, he eventually gave up and endorsed Trump. Kennedyheads, who had given up there time and money to a real outsider, saw Kennedy give up and endorse a former President. They need to be talked off the rooftops, but are they dumb stupid morons? When has a third party candidate ever really mattered? Three, arguably five, times;
1924: Calvin Coolidge (R) v John Davis
(D) v Robert La Follette
(P)
1968: Richard Nixon (R) v Hubert Humphrey
(D) v George Wallace
(AI)
1992: Bill Clinton (D) v George H.W Bush
(R) v Ross Perot
(I)
These third parties were either marginal influences in the party that had a great amount of regional influence, but a marginal voice if any at all in the party they were associated with - so they struck out and walked their own path, and enthralled millions with their unique messaging. This longpost will look at what they did right, and where Kennedy went wrong.
There are two other third party runs that did very well, but I'm not counting them for a few reasons
The election of 1912 had Progressive Teddy Roosevelt comfortably humiliate Republican Howard Taft in the best ever performance for a third party, coming second with 88 EVs to Howard Taft's 8 EVs. I'm not counting Teddy because he was a former president - I think any third party run would be made stronger by the candidate being a former President.
The election of 1848 had Martin Van Buren win 10% of the vote with the Free Soil party, an anti-slavery party - impressive, but he's not included because he is both a former President, and his third party run had him compete against the Democrats and the Whigs. Around 1896 is when the two party system as we understand it emerges, and the cut-off point to studying third party runs begins.
1924 - Robert "Fighting Bob" La Follette, Progressive Party (Wisconsin) 
"Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from men who are aggressive for what is wrong."
Wisconsin has always been a liberal state - meaning that in the early 20th century, it was a Republican strong hold, dominated La Follette and his son, Robert La Follette Jr. La Follette's progressivism was the old school, prairie kind - born and raised on farms, with a conservative "got mine" bent to it that pleasingly led to a dedication to civil liberties and isolationism.
Come 1924, and the Democrats and Republicans both nominate conservatives. Calvin Coolidge won re-nomination as the Republican, while after 103 ballots John Davis was settled on when delegates at the convention started to run out of money had to leave. If you think the duopoly is bad today, Coolidge and Davis aligned on nearly every issue, differing only on condemning the Klan (Davis did so, Silent Cal did not) and on tariffs (Davis liked them low, Coolidge liked them high). Otherwise they agreed on a limited government, deregulated industry and tax cuts. American conservatism has never had it so good, the uniparty in fundamental agreement.
La Follette, not a man loyal to any particular party despite being a Republican, was angry that neither party had nominated any kind of liberal. At the 4th Conference for Progressive Political Action, 1,200 delegates composed of union members, socialists, liberals but not communists, frick off Foster , nominated Robert La Follette and Burton Wheeler, a ticket that called for mass nationalisation of companies, tax hikes and support for labour unions. And he did amazingly - despite what the map may tell you.
"Well winning one state is impressive for a third party, but is it really that good?"
Yep. He won 16.6% of the vote, nearly half the votes of Davis, won his home state of Wisconsin and beat Davis (coming in second) in the following states; Oregon, California, Washington, Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Wyoming, Iowa, Minnesota and both the Dakotas . These are some pretty astonishing results, located mostly in the Western plains with a higher amount of farms then normal. So, how on earth did La Follette do so well?
It can't be denied that his unique politics played a role. When both parties have so much in common, it's clear there's an unheard voice in that election and La Follette was able to amplify that voice. There was so much frustration that he near totally unified the left, leaving only the communists out in the cold. Another advantage he had over Coolidge and Davis is that he was actually the one to campaign. Coolidge had a pretty understandable reason - his son Calvin Jr died in a freak tennis accident, when he got a blister that turned sepsis. Obviously in a deep grief, Coolidge rarely left the White House and his campaign speeches were mostly about his theory of governance rather than addressing the issues or his opponents. By contrast, Davis just didn't like campaigning much and in his meeting with party bosses would need his arm twisted to say to he supports them because showing affection in any way was simply not his character. Equally valid reasons, I'm sure one would agree.
Coolidge was always going to defeat to Davis thanks to the booming economy, but La Follette turned Davis into a joke - to this day, Davis' 28.8% amount of the vote is the worst a Democrat has ever done in the Popular Vote, isolating his support near entirely in the Jim Crow South where votes were tightly controlled. To explain just how lacking Davis' support was, electoral votes in the electoral college are determined by population. California had 13 EVs, Alabama had 12. California, won by Coolidge, had 1,263,413 votes with about 400,000 going to La Follette. Alabama, won by Davis, had 157,971 votes, with 45,005 going to Coolidge. Underscoring just how catastrophic Davis' loss was, during the 1864 US election, the South was not able to vote in the election due to the "rebellion" thing - and McCellan still got 44.9% of the vote against Lincoln.
La Follette would die in 1925 at 70, meaning he never got to see his work vindicated by the Democratic party. In 1928, Al Smith would win the Democratic nomination. A progressive, urban Catholic, the south would abandon him in droves due to fear of Papal influence while the north continued to bet on the Republicans - with President Herbert Hoover winning in one of the biggest landslides at the time. Hoover would be left holding the bag when the economy crashed, New York Governor Franklin Roosevelt would unite the Democrats and the country to implement many of La Follette's ambitions - except of course, without the isolationism.
1968 - George Wallace, American Independence Party (Alabama) 
George Wallace standing in the doorway of the University of Alabama to block the entrance of black students. "I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!"
From a left wing populist to a right wing populist, George Wallace was about as anti-La Follette as you could get. With Hubert Humphrey supporting measures to integrate society and Nixon opposing de-jure segregation, George Wallace, who had built a national profile as one of the top opponents to integration, ran third party to appeal to the raving bigots. The Wallace campaign plan was to win enough states to prevent Nixon from getting 270 Electoral Votes, force the election to the House and work out a deal where Nixon would uphold Segregation and Wallace released his EVs to let Nixon become President. His plan was to speak aggressively and passionately, decrying the elitism of the mainstream parties and "handouts" from the Great Society like Nixon did.
But he also mimicked Humphrey with his support for unions. He had no issue with an honest days pay for an honest days work - but wasn't it so unfair you were paying for lazy people? While he struck a middle ground economically, he went in a different direction for the war - Nixon was "peace", Humphrey was for status quo, and Wallace was ramping it up. An infamous quote of his is "We win in 90 days or we pull out", which sometimes misinterpreted as a peace plan. Wallace wanted to destroy North Vietnam, to teach Red China and the Soviet Union a lesson . More importantly, he didn't talk about segregation unless pressed about it, where he would of course defend it. Wallace's victory plan was to build a coalition of single issue voters, racists, anti-welfare union workers, warhawks and people that enjoyed him picking fights with hippies, to cause the deadlock.
Trust me, picking fights with hippies is critical to the central thesis regarding Kennedy. To generate enough media attention, he used inflammatory language to create controversy. "The only four letter words don't know are W-O-R-K and S-O-A-P!" he would say of his protestors. When it came to the Lyndon Johnson's protestors? "If any anarchists lie in front of my automobile, it'll be the last automobile they ever lie in front of." Sometimes he'd even get into shouting matches with his protestors. When called a fascist, he boasted "I was killing fascists while you were in diapers!" Another memorable line was when he grinned and chatted to a heckler. "I love you, I really do. Because when you come to me, I get another million votes." People loved it. While Humphrey was in full shill mode, trying to pick up the pieces of the Democratic party, and while Nixon was chilling not doing anything at all because he was winning massively, Wallace was the man in the arena, ranting and raving in a way people loved.
Wallace at his peak was polling at an astonishing 20% of the vote, but crashed out pretty badly during LeMay's first press conference. "We seem to have a phobia of nuclear weapons" LeMay began. He would continue with "it doesn't make much of a difference to me if I have go to a jungle in Vietnam and get killed with a rusty knife or get killed with a nuclear weapon. As a matter of fact, if I had the choice I would lean towards nuclear weapon." Wallace, visibly panicked, steps in to say "General LeMay hasn't advocated for nuclear weapons, not at all. He discussed nuclear weapons with you, he is against the use of nuclear weapons and I am too." Moments later, LeMay was asked if he would use nukes on Vietnam. "If I found it necessary." Like a fricking sitcom.
The consequences were swift and brutal, with Wallace plateauing from 20% of the vote to around 14%-12%, and he would ultimately get 13.5% of the vote and a far better EV count than La Follette.
301 EVs is a pretty respectable amount from Nixon, but Wallace's defeat was a lot closer then one might think. The Midwestern states had the powerful union votes split between Wallace and Humphrey, letting Nixon sweep the anti-union vote easily. But Nixon only won several Southern states with less then 40% of the vote. Had Wallace preformed better or rather, not suffered from the LeMay fiasco, he could have won North Carolina or Tennessee due to thinness of Nixon's victory. The margin for Nixon's victory goes from 301 - 191 - 46 to 289 - 191 - 58, still a win but a narrow win when you need 270 to win without a deadlock.
In turn, Missouri and Ohio both have Nixon with a margin of roughly 1% over Humphrey. If Wallace didn't have the nuke comments weighing him down, he could have tapped better into the Conservatives of the state and allowed Humphrey to win them both. If those states went blue but Nixon got every vote from North Carolina, the margin of victory is 269 - 229 - 45, just one EV from preventing Wallace's actual victory of forcing Nixon to end integration. Granted, this is all a lot of what ifs. But Wallace's defeat was a very narrow thing.
After the election, Wallace crawled back to the Democrats and became a bizarrely accepted part of it - to the point there were rumours of a Humphrey/Wallace ticket in 1972. He would ultimately come third in the 1972 primaries, despite being shot, and managed to outlive both Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon, despite being shot. His legacy is of interest only to historians, his riot having accomplished nothing at all. De-jure segregation is illegal, and de-facto segregation remains commonplace all over America - no thanks to Wallace's tantrum.
1992 - Ross Perot, Independent (Texas) 
"The budget should be balanced, the treasury should be refilled, the public debt should be reduced and the arrogance of public officials should be controlled."
After dealing with two populists, it only makes sense our final candidate before Kennedy is Ross Perot - an anti-populist. A man who went on TV, promised to raise taxes and cut benefits, and soared to the top of the polls.
That's not an exaggeration - Gallup had at one point Ross Perot leading with 39% of the vote, to Bush's 31% and Clinton's 29% of the vote, past the 4% margin of error. As well as these other candidates have done, none of them have ever been polled at outright beating both candidates.
His key policy was going against the grain, and embracing protectionism when Bush and Clinton were both enthusiastic supporters of NAFTA. During the debates, he eerily prophesied "there will be a giant sucking sound going south" if NAFTA passes due to Mexico's lax environmental and labour laws. His other
Those were his most notable policies, and what he really railed against Bush and Clinton on. Bush had got them in this mess, and Clinton's liberal policies weren't gonna get them out. But he also had an eclectic series of other policies - like "Direct Democracy" through electronic town halls (fitting for a CEO of a company that specialised in computers), and a less involved America (although not isolationist).
Also unique was his messaging. While Clinton used platitudes and uplifting advertising, and Bush viciously attacked Clinton as a philandering communist plant, Perot's defining ads would be him buying 30 minutes of air time and frankly explaining what he thought was right for the country and how he would do it, with CHARTS BABY!
It's goes against every single populist idea there's ever been. Perot had policy that didn't have "popular" aspects of it, delivered in a frank, clear and detailed manner. By nearly any political junkie's understanding of the American electorate, he should have flopped, his advertisements discovered by pathetic teenagers saying "so true!" and calling themselves Perotstans in the new 20s.
There is a lot more to the story then this, worthy of it's own article (I haven't even mentioned Perot thinking the CIA was sabotaging him or dropping out of the race), but that is the short version when it comes to analysing Perot's place in third party history.
With Bush losing, the Republicans generally considered Perot to have stolen votes from Bush and handing Clinton the election - the facts don't reflect this, Perot generally took from both bases, but the Republicans grudgingly took notice and for the midterms introduced the Contract With America, an ambitious set of reforms that included the Balanced Budget Amendment to outlaw deficit and term limits for members of Congress - all of which failed to pass.
Perot would try his luck again in 1996, forming the Reform Party and couping it's nomination from Richard Lamm, and getting decent results - 8.4% is nothing to sneeze at, and more then enough to win the party federal funding. The party's apex would be in 1998, when former pro-wrestler Jesse "The Body" Ventura won the Minnesota Gubernatorial race. The Reform party would crumble shortly afterwards, as Progressives and Paleoconservatives feuded with each other over which way to take the party - ultimately the Paleoconservatives won, nominating Pat Buchanan and getting less then 1% in 2000. Ross Perot for his part endorsed George Bush.
2024 - Robert Francis Kennedy Jr, Independent (California) 
"Why should somebody be able to pollute the air, which belongs to all of us, or destroy a river or a waterway, which is supposed to belong to the whole community?"
What does a left wing populist, a right wing populist, and centrist anti-populist have in common? Why did they succeed when the Greens, the Libertarians, the Communists, and my GOATS the Prohibition Party fail, time after time?
I narrowed it down to three factors.
A wedge issue
A wide coalition
A unique voice
A Wedge Issue
The first and most important step is the wedge issue. La Follette had progressivism, Wallace had segregation and Perot had NAFTA and the deficit. You need to be saying something that no one else is saying, that really resonates. Chase Oliver of the Libertarians fails because his socially progressive message is being used by the Democrats, and his fiscal conservatism is being used by the Republicans. Perhaps there are voters that prefer his message as a whole, but most consider one issue more important and back the party likely to win to accomplish this goal.
It's called the marketplace of ideas, and you need to operate like a business. You can't walk in with a mishmash of policy both party's are offering, you just enter a saturated market. You need a unique selling point no other competitor is offering, or else you'll just be overshadowed by your better funded competitors. (Glad to put my diploma in business to good use).
Did RFK Jr have these unique ideas? In a sense he did. As he pointed out frequently, the COVID-19 vaccines came from one Donald J. Trump's project Warpspeed.
This didn't matter. Despite starting as a hippie thing, of which RFK is a remnant of, vaccine scepticism has become firmly an stance of the fringe right, who Donald Trump commands. They may not like that Trump is pro-vaccine (here's Trump being booed for saying his crowd should take the vaccine) , but he is still their guy. Saying "uhhhh I don't trust those vaccines" doesn't fly when Q is warning people if they don't back Trump JFK Jr will stay dead or whatever.
A Wide Coalition
This is important, third party or first. No single issue is ever popular enough to propel someone to the finish line just on that single issue. You need to have a stance on everything that's in the public consensus as "important". La Follette's sheer uniqueness gave him the widest coalition of the American left there's ever really been, while George Wallace flirted with Warhawks and the unions. Ross Perot's top concern was the economy, but he also had the most non-interventionist foreign policy and some eccentric ideas on general governance.
I conducted a small (tiny) poll asking random people why they thought RFK Jr was running and to assume it was in good faith. The vast majority of the answers I got were "vaccines". I had three other answers of the dozen or so people I asked - one included Bobby's issues with the FDA, which is technically different but ranting about the chemicals in our food is on a similar wavelength to anti-vaccine rhetoric, two answers included opposition to the duopoly, and one came from an outright Bobby fan who correctly identified Bobby has having the most anti-corporate, pro-environment platform in the race (aided by Biden and Harris not actually having a platform).
No one mentioned his isolationist foreign policy, his shockingly progressive stance on race, his transphobia, or his ties to crypto currency. Because he never really talked about it! It was all about the Duopoly, the FDA, or the Vaccines. He seemed to be trying to build this wide net on his policy page, but gave up when it came time to campaign and focused on his most nutjob stances.
Opposing the Two-Party system isn't enough. If it was, Gary Johnson would be included in this list. Remember him? The 2016 Libertarian candidate, running against two of the least popular mainstream candidates ever. He won 3.28% of the vote, not a terrible result for a third party, but hardly what you would expect from arguably the least popular race of all time.
So RFK Jr doesn't really have a wedge issue, and he doesn't really have a coalition. Surely such a wacky candidate has the final part?
A Unique Voice
He sure did have a unique voice! Because spasmodic dysphonia and he does seek treatment for it, it's very insensitive to make fun of it.
But when it comes to how he campaigned, he was rather standard. He appeared on podcasts… and that was about it
Sitting down and explaining your crank beliefs on a podcast may have been unique in 2010, but it's really not that different from sitting down and explaining your crank beliefs on a TV show these days. In fact, Donald Trump has been the one experimenting with messaging, doing a "X Space" and going on a livestream with popular r-slur Adin Ross.
There is one exception to this. One instance where he had a truly message that wasn't about chemicals, delivered in a manner that was unique and appealed to people outside of his eccentric circle - his Superbowl ad, wherein all that was advertised is that a Kennedy is running for president, and he's younger than Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
The same fricking duopoly message that doesn't work.
In all three factors, Kennedy came up short. He couldn't wedge an issue, he refused to expand his circle, and his campaign style was far blander then his bizarre campaign ideas.
Kenndy and his scandals
The Scandals
Scandals are part of any good campaign, and Kennedy is no exception. His campaign may be more famous for the constant, bizarre scandals then any of his very silly beliefs.
All I can say is Kennedy is very, very lucky that the outlandish scandals overshadowed his dark past.
In the same day he was accused of eating a dog, he was accused of sexually assaulting a woman he hired as babysitter, allegations he responded to with a blasé "I am not a Church Boy". These very serious criminal allegations were overshadowed by the ludicrous ones, a reoccurring theme. The fact he literally had a brainworm overshadowed how this information got out - it was disclosed during divorce proceedings where he was so callous to his ex-wife during and after the marriage, he drove her to suicide. There is a real darkness in Kennedy, overshadowed by the utter farce much of his campaign seemed to be.
The future of third parties
It's hard to not view the future of third party politics as bleak. The party's are more unified then ever, but that's come with polarisation increasing loyalty to the parties. Wedge issues are by their nature impossible to predict, and in the age of mass media, what's unique is generally a very fleeting thing.
Joe Biden dropped out of the race, Donald Trump got shot about two months ago, and the world has just continued to chug with those events just being part of the news cycle. The third party uniqueness vital for them to stand a chance seems like they're much more likely to just be a fad, rather than anything impactful.
I hope I'm wrong. But more likely, you'll see outsiders - like former Reform party member Donald Trump or Independent Bernie Sanders work within the party, and force compromises along inside the system.
- HailVictory1776 : Globalist shill
- GOLEM : polish thread about russia
- MARFAN_EATS_DOODOO : ziggers mad x24
- Thirtythirst4sissies : There is literally not a single Russhit on this website btw
- 77
- 154
Dear Putin,
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) November 17, 2024
I hope this post fiinds you well... We want you to know, the American people do not support Ukraine or this administrations escalation over there.
It’s only our corrupt neocon government that does.
Signed,
Real Americans
I think we can all agree this is an absolutely pathetic post lmao.
Note rightoid seethe:
The fact that the Biden regime is trying to start WWIII right before Trump, who just won a historic landslide victory who ran on ending the Russia/Ukraine war, just shows how evil these POS treasonous traitors scumbags really are.
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) November 17, 2024
The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives.
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 17, 2024
Gotta lock in those $Trillions.
Life be darned!!! Imbeciles! https://t.co/ZzfwnhBxRh
Biden is trying to start World War 3
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 17, 2024
This is pathological and totally insane.
US weaponry should NOT be used to fire into the interior of Russia!
Imagine if Russia supplied missiles to fire into America!
Imagine if Mexico attacked the US with missiles supplied by Russia.
— Doug Henwood (@DougHenwood) November 17, 2024
Why are neo rightoids so cucked?
: Noon you can't act like the stronger country they have nukes what if they use them nooo they said they surely will this time
Meanwhile Russia:
!anticommunists !nonchuds destroy russoids
- 109
- 79
Lots of things have bothered me, a lot, over time. Brexit, Amazon & Google, Netflix, Trump, AI... But it's only been specifically recently with Musk and Farage that I truly felt scared for my future, my kids future.
Right off the bat we are faced with the full frontal delusion of the average . After his country is bombarded with 1.2 million people a year during a time when COVID had dealt a Mortal Kombat finisher to an economy in terminal Stage IV socialism, the bong sifts past all this to find a single guardian headline about Elon Musk meeting with Farage (The devil himself).
I literally have no idea why he references Netflix. I'm sure it isn't all the they added to our period dramas
The idea that Musk can do trivially choose to give any amount of money to the far right in our country
political donations? Perish the thought! The Supreme Soviet Presidium of SSR Blighty would never take money from wealthy donors
Diagnosing the Collapse
To anyone with eyes, the reason for Britain's demise is completely fricking obvious. To the labour voter, however, this poses a problem since access to young moroccan bussy is a point of personal contention, and so he must invent alternative explanations as to why their Christmas market looks like this:
I'm worried about the UK now. Average British person these days sounds like Oswald Mosely.
We live in a period
The same journ*lists who stopped using X because it's 'far-right'? Or was it the ones who Made out that Rwandan mass murderer Axel Rudakubana was a welsh Christian and innocent Choir boy? Perhaps it was the journ*lists who, at risk of prejudicing a trial, invented a Pakistani Migrant superhero who was able to 'wrestle a knife' from an attacker, unharmed and unbloodied with no witnesses, only to deliver a pro-migration homily in a pull-focused interview?
Of course, they're 'scapegoated' because it's literally impossible that immigration could've maybe, perhaps, possibly caused a public finances problem.
How would this affect you personally? Well, I would stop reading stories about women being r*ped to death in public by somalians, for one thing. Quieter buses for another.
It's a fait accompli, comrade! Nothing can be done, we just have to Spend 5.7 billion pounds on asylum seekers because of uhhh George Bush or something
in actual fact the issue has always been a chronic underinvestment in actually useful services
It's because we haven't sacrificed enough blood for the blood god!
Render to the worms what is theirs! Another 50 billion for free dentists in Eritrea
ignore that silly little graph teehee
We've been fricked since Thatcher destroyed the post war consensus
Oh, it was Thatcher, was it? What an original and thoughtful analysis of 2024 britain
Far right discourse is so normalised that a sitting member of parliament had his bank account shut down for being xenophobic
Far right violence is so normalised that a man was given over two years in prison for shouting by the same justice system that let an infant r*pe enthusiast walk free!
The biggest issue for the UK is lack of full access to the EU single market and a customs union.
brave dramatard here baited several
to emerge from their slam poetry events
How many "hard left socialist" parties were successful in the last General Election?
yeah it's just this really fringe party you might not've heard of it
yeah that's like totally normal, right?
Looks normal to me!
I ain't reading all that:
- The bankers the bonuses the bankers the bonuses it's disgusting, and if the tories were serious they would tax the bankers the bonuses to 90%
I invite !britbongs to weigh in with their own interpretation
- 121
- 152
Introduction
I was scrolling the dreges of reddit for content, as you do..
I like looking in the BPD subreddit, usually I can find some of the juiciest drama there
_____
Now as many of you know, most diagnosed BPD cases are found in women.
That means a lot of posts on /r/BPD deal with relationships, romance and raging hysteria.
Though, sometimes you get a rare gem. A BPD male, or in this case, a self diagnosed BPD male.
____
Meet /u/FrankBuns
A twenty something that managed to land one of the most controversial posts in /r/BPD this month.
Quite the accomplishment!
I'll go over some of that later, FrankBuns has been pretty open on reddit.
The Controversy
Now surprisingly, despite all the times I've seen otherwise, the denizens of /r/BPD did not pat FrankBuns on the back
Apparently, the communal braincell all redditors fight over was well and alive in this post's comments:
Why worry about the diagnosis. In my experience having a diagnosis doesn't do much for you aside from changing how doctors think about you. Worry about treating the symptoms you're experiencing and improving your quality of life. Diagnosis are just unnecessary labels that can come with stigma and lack of understanding.
FrankBuns: Because I want to get better, and idk, I feel like that would have to be the first step. I think there's a lot of reason in your comment, I'd like to think that even if I don't have BPD (which I still believe that I do) then learning the skills to handle it would be beneficial if not for dealing with my issues, then helping a loved one or friend in the future who might be going through the same stuff.
Then do DBT, anyone can do DBT.
Redditor Sneeding about "the system"
everything's a racket, it wouldn't exist in a capitalist society if it weren't.
dsm just allows clinicians to standardize care and makes billing easier, it's not any grand insight into human existence. look up some articles about dsm5 and professionals in the field who take exception with the changes from dsm4. It's just academics bickering, whose pet theories get to dominate.
Yes, I'm bitter. Grants Pass decision was a direct indictment of the failure of American care, we had 40 years of funding to provide treatment and people don't feel like we were effective now and now we aren't focusing on treatment anymore. This whole field dropped the ball and vulnerable people will suffer. Frick the dsm.
You'd be better off reading the bhagavad gita or dostoyevsky than the dsm if you're trying to heal.
____
Right about now, you may be asking:
"wait a sec, Lilmarsey, how do you know that this is actually a moid posting this and not an FtM?"
I'm so glad you asked, now you'll have to see it, too:
I will not be posting the other two pictures, you can go to
His whole butthole was out
It makes sense that he'd have some of these traits, given that this is a
✨ homosexual ✨
____
Hmm...funny you should say that.
_____
mental illness comes with friends
FrankBuns has also posted about shrooms and has expressed interest in DMT.
He was also a chronic masturbator.
https://old.reddit.com/r/NoFap/comments/10pvv17/oops/
FrankBuns also has a track record of being a bit of a hypochondriac.
Making posts like "what is this dark spot on my foot", and "why does my foot have orange spots"
https://i.imgur.com/gallery/r-askdocs-QPuy48p
He's also a very active furry, and stupid enough to facedoxx.
I'm sure you may also be wondering
"Wow! I wonder the relationship FrankBuns ominously mentioned went?"
I'm so glad you asked:
The "break"
As we all know, either party asking for a time out in a relationship usually bodes badly for relationship stability.
"Wow, that didn't last long, did it?"
_______
TLDR: typical redditor that I spent way too much time writing about
- BimothyX2 : who
- 18
- 50
She's too cute!
I got some great skincare supplies after work today, and I feel content. I also got a cute lil valentines-ish makeup bag, who am I?
- CasinoFiend : OP is a dirty r-slur gorilla BIPOC. Do not engage
- 72
- 45
欢迎你们回来!
#freeboounironically
- 1
- 6
i was making a joke since u were of age it's surprising he'd follow u because ure a pedophile
— Kendi Dilworth (she/her) (@KenDillgames) March 2, 2025
- 55
- 51
Most Based Comments
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘
Wait? You've "moved on" from him cheating on you? You seem like you are walking on eggshells. You deserve better. (972)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘
"My boyfriend also has a history of drunkenly cheating on me"Ma'am… (6401)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘
Let's call this what it is You are not really worried about her age being 21. You're worried that he's doing the exact same thing he did with you, this time with someone younger than you and I think that's the biggest issue - that she's younger than YOU, because it's like something "new and shiny" came along that's about to take your place. She's 21, if you have been in this field for that long then you should know it's not uncommon in the restaurant/bar industry to have a lot of older male "friends" that are regulars because it helps with tips and building a clientele. The concern is not him befriending a young girl, it's that he's not trustworthy and he's proven that to you many times according to your post. You'd likely feel this way if she was also 29. Believe people when they show you who they really are. (79)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Moved on as in I'm not letting that situation affect entirely how I feel on this situation. I know me being upset by this isn't me being insecure. (-597)
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Biggest Lolcow: /u/SkoolBoi19
Score: 🐮🔘🔘🔘🔘
Number of comments: 3
Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
Maximum angriness: 😡😡🔘🔘🔘
Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents.
Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
- 35
- 75
شكراً لتواصلك مع القيادة العامة لشرطة دبي، تم تحويل الموضوع للجهة المختصة لإتخاذ الإجراءات اللازمة.#أمنكم_سعادتنا
— Dubai Policeشرطة دبي (@DubaiPoliceHQ) January 1, 2025
🇦🇪 Dubai police have launched an investigation into tourists mocking a Muslim couple dining. The women have been detained. pic.twitter.com/T7pI1nBBce
— Update NEWS (@UpdateNews724) January 4, 2025
- usernaw : turkphobia
- DickButtKiss : someone should punch him in the face too
- QueenOfSchqiperia : It literally is so over for hasan
-
Wojak
: ADL..... I kneel
- KoreanDramaKing : I cant believe the mod who banned him was named Samson Hydeman.
- Freak-Off : Cute twinkness. beware
- 6
- 31
Angry bride struggles through vows as guest lets baby cry during ‘adults-only’ ceremony https://t.co/krV5rYs4IS pic.twitter.com/XwHcQoRkeQ
— New York Post (@nypost) February 17, 2025
- 44
- 58
Greetings Dramatards
I've been binging a lot of Anime which had specifically aired in South Africa on the Anime specific infamous channel Animax which had aired on DSTV in many Southern African channels from the mid 2000s to the early 2010s, before it was shitcanned by the producers during the era in which greedy executives thought about replacing much of their Broadcasting
roster, with Reality TV nonsense.
During the Reality TV nonsense era, we got bullshit on the famous Documentary Channels (Trademark/Copyright ) which was so nicknamed by Safricans for being clustered together sequentially on the DSTV channels (Usually from channels 65, 66, 67, 68 & 69).
They were Discovery Channel, National Geographic Channel, Animal Planet, the History Channel, and so on. They were relatively popular for at the time you got tune into one of these 4/5 channels at any point in time, morning to midnight, and there would be something worthy of your time airing
The History Channel got nicknamed the Hitler Channel because of the channel's apparent obsession with WW2, but it was still vary popular with africans like
@Murdervann, though others got very tired
from the near exclusive focus on WW2 era, and usually from viewpoints from the Allied side (it was made in Burgerland/Bongland usually).
Little did we know how much we would yearn back to to the Hitler Channel days - cuz then the Reality TV menace era attacked! No longer was documentaries the norm when you tuned into the Documentary squad of channels, instead it was the most low brow, common as grass, lowest common denominator Reality TV slop.
The worst offender would be the infamous History Channel, which would rebrand large sections of it's runtime as "HISTORY MADE EVERYDAY" They would air crap like Ice Road Truckers and fricking Ancient Aliens - holy frick what a fall.
And the WORST of all was that apparently fricking normies liked this shit - cuz the TV brands claimed that they were making gangbusters, and that ratings was higher than ever - which was contrary to literally every Boer boomer whom i talked to regarding the fall of the documentary channels, and ESPECIALLY THE disgrace of the Hitler Channel, which even the detractors now missed, and in hindsight declaimed was much better than this reality TV brokenshit dogshit
It was in this point in my life when i realized that large sectors of the populations of society - just have really really really REALLY dogshit taste
The reality TV nonsense also began to spread to other channels, with soooooooooo many fricking macho Auction nonsense, like these posers who pretended to the camera that they were cool, while buying shit from Shipping containers. But the true dark age came, when inevitably also Animax, the anime channel would be desecrated.
It came in waves - 1st only parts of airtime was now dedicated to weird Yank nonsense shows, like Kenny-vs-Spenny (the worst travesty ever to be broadcasted upon mine eyes
), that Octagon survival mindrape show, and some were good like the Ninja Warrior where magnificent athletes performed spectacular feats of fitness, but it wasn't fricking anime!
Rest in Peace Animax
Now I've been intending on watching every single Anime show ever aired upon Animax in it's half decade of running, so that I might make a megapost Longpost about Animax and the drama following it being soft-cockblocked by executive harpies, and have a short blurb at the end of the Longpost, where I placed may review/recommendation on every show aired.
Of course this project started January, and it's now October..... please forgive me Dramatards, but anime takes a lot of endurance to finish.
Now you guys know how many dramatards absolutely despise anime to a self-destructive irrational extent?! How on every single Weekly-Anime-Watch post on rdrama.net is filled with people expressing their violent fantasies to keelhaul all anime fans?? Well I'm here to tell you guys.................that they are absolutely right, anime as a medium is fricking brokenshit
I've talked about it before, but I despise the cultural chauvinism of Japs, just as much as I despise the wokeism of westoid liberals, I think it to be two sides of the same coin - the same emotion but inverted. Wokes place their culture beneath others, while cultural chauvinists place theirs above everything.
There's a great deal of reasons to hate Anime and anime fandoms, like the proliferation of libertarian-bait by anime and fans, the uncritical acceptance of bad writing by fools.
For me the root cause of much of what I despise in anime can be summed up in Japanese cultural Chavinism. There is much to admire in Japanese society, their discipline in keeping public spaces clean, the adoration of international audiences when they clean stadiums after Olympics, their politeness and industriousness.
But I'm not a filthy weeb, and I've also seen much of how their self-blinding of their
culture can also hobble them. Much of their modern societal problems like the low birthrate and stagnating economy, can be likened to a lumbering ship, with a rudder too small to change course compared to speedboats. It's like they are shackled and chained by their culture and adherence to tradition.
This I believe can be reflected in their writing of Anime - especially the negative parts. The repulsive incestuousness of tropes and cliches. It's like mobile games constantly in a war on the PlayStore on Android, where their gacha games try to plagiarize each other. The constant fricking repeated character archtypes. Like holy frick, the actual fact that there are recognizable archtypes which can be summed up into one word like Tsundere's are an indication of the sheer SHALLOWNESS and repetativeness of Japanese character writing, NOT a fricking strength as weebs lead themselves to believe.
https://the-dere-types.fandom.com/wiki/Tsundere
The insular nature of the Japanese Manga and Anime industry can be felt just as strongly as that of modern Hollyweird. In the same fricking way in which the cultural Zeigheist of fricking modern contemporary California and San Francisco, bleeds into modern High Profile shows like Rangs of Power, Witcher, Willow, and Wheel of Time, by incorporating Modern Contemporary politics and values, even into the fictional societies divorced from the modern world by hundreds of years, and continents, the reflection is so self serving and navel-gazing, that the Woke yanks are incapable of envisioning societies other than their own - which is why the woke slop is so meanderingly undistinctive.
So too is the navel-gazing in the Jap Anime industry's isolation from other cultures felt. I often laugh at other chuds telling me that at least the modern Gayming landscape and Anime industry will be SAVED by the more conservatively-minded japanese society and Anime-industry!
And I'm like: lol, lmoa.
The Japs insular nature is every bit as abrasive for me as that of Hollyweird. They hobble themselves, with their incapacity to even know about cultures and histories and stories other than their own. And it's not just shit like regurgitated genres, like the perpetual trendchasing Isekai slop deluge currently in modern anime, which even Weebs will decry as being painfully derivative.
Take for example their perpetual obsession with their Samurai and Sengoku periods. It's all so
There is seldom ever swords or weapons or cowtools or costumes from a non-Japanese inspired historic nation. Whenever Japanese shows take fricking place in the past or some magical other realm, it is often just Japan but in the past. Never a variation of Chinese of Indian, or philipino or Vietnamese or Korea historically-inspired settings or weapons or costumes or cultures. Always the same fricking katana sword, never even the myriad of different weaponry like spears and firearms which real-historic samurai used - it's like a human centipede of regurgitated cliches and copycats.
Oh and don't forget the massive infantile nature of Japs in the anime industry. Many Anime, even the very violent ones, have this peculiar obsession for taking place in Schools! Doesn't matter if they are violent horrors, clearly not intended to be watched by todlers, there will be a fricking high school in their somewhere It's so pervasive - do the Japanese just not have any other universal experience they can shorthand for their fellow Japs?? Is Highschool just the last moment of happiness Jap animators experienced before they became
wageslaves for the rest of their miserable existence????
I've often found that the best Anime had to offer was when the Japanese went out of their comfort zones, when they explicitly tried to incorporate cultures or histories not of their own, when they suspended their cultural Chauvinism for just a moment, and reflected onto other cultures - because I believe the products they created was superior to both mother cultures.
Shows like Black Lagoon, taking inspiration from a myriad of Pacific and international influences, Vinland Saga Season 1, where the author went to great degrees to research a history outside of his own. Even famous anime like Death Note which even non-Anime fans are aware of, and has been watched by people whom have never watched any other anime in their lives, wear their non-jap influence on its sleave.
It reminds me a lot of Seven Samurai
- A movie which is very dear to me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Samurai
Basically a bunch of brokenshit poor rice farmers are being extorted by bandits, during a very unstable era, where there is no national law-and-order from the shogunate, and these poorcel poors are basically boned. Because their harvest semi-failed, and they literally cannot meat their annual extortion tribute, without literally suicidaly starving themselves in the coming winter.
In a last ditch effort, caught between the devil and the deep blue sea, some farmers volunteer to go to the nearby big cities and requisition the services of samurai to defend them against the bandits. But the issue is as we've mentioned, they are brokenshit poor, and literally cannot pay with anything more than rice - but our protagonist rice farmers are still determined to go and find at least a couple of benevolent ronins......
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20181029-the-100-greatest-foreign-language-films
The movie Seven Samurai was released in 1954 and MANY people at the time, and since, have stated that the film had obvious Western influence, as in it being influenced by yank Western Cowboy movies
https://www.bfi.org.uk/features/seven-samurai-akira-kurosawa-classic-status
The film was not expected to be a success, and was a truly risky venture.
====Donald Richie, in his book The Films of Akira Kurosawa (published in 1965), reported the director's exasperated response to such attacks: "You try to give a film a little pictorial scope and the journ*lists jump on you for spending too much money. That is what I really hate about them – they are only an extended form of advertising." Kurosawa also pointed out that the expenditure on Seven Samurai was but a fraction of the means available to directors in the west, claiming that Japanese films were made too cheaply.====
REMEMBER YOU NEVER HATE FRICKING JOURNOS ENOUGH
====Most reviews drew attention to the influence of the western on Kurosawa, particularly the films of John Ford, with Monthly Film Bulletin surmising, "If all this attests to the way Kurosawa has assimilated the influence of Western directors for his own purposes, it also explains, perhaps, the detached attitude of Seven Samurai. ====
==== claiming this "extraordinary film, which matches his first [Rashomon] for cinema brilliance… bears cultural comparison with our own popular western High Noon. That is to say, it is a solid, naturalistic, he-man outdoor action film, wherein the qualities of human strength and weakness are discovered in a crisis taut with peril. And although the occurrence of this crisis is set in the sixteenth century in a village in Japan, it could be transposed without surrendering a basic element to the nineteenth century and a town on our own frontier."====
Many yank
cowboy movies had the elements of Frontiersmenship and the ruthlessness that the uncivilized world had upon mankind. Often yank cowboy stories are about lone benevolent heroic men having to step up against dangers like intruder bandits whom were terrorizing the helpless in frontier-towns, when law-enforcement or higher security was too far located from civilized coastal cities. Many themes between these distinctly American media, and Seven Samurai was shared in the storytelling.
Considering the incredible cultural influence Yanks had upon Japan pre- and ESPECIALLY post-WW2, it was only natural that artistic directors like Akira Kurosawa, would loan story elements and thematic building blocks from the best of a foreign culture. I mean holy shit, modern anime as we know it literally developed as an imitation to Disney cartoons!
The very earliest anime from 1950s-1960s looked distinctly western when compared to the later forms in which the anime medium would develop in the 1970s-1990s!
https://wallflyer.wordpress.com/2017/01/21/goku-astro-boy-and-mickey-mouse-character-design/
Speaking of cross-cultural pollination: 6 years later, ANOTHER of my most favorite movies of all time (and perhaps one of the best in history) would be released. The Magnificent Seven! (1960)!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magnificent_Seven
It became both a critical and commercial success and has been appraised as one of the greatest films of the Western genre. Where this time, the movie copied the broad basic plot of the Seven Samurai, but westernized it - in the same way in which 4Kids westernized Riceballz into Jelly Donuts
But no really, the movie changes many cultural things, to the extent that character inspirations and personalities change - but the core remains the same: 7 men willing to show up when the call to aid comes from a Mexican village of Maize farmers.
I personally believe that in the same way restrictions had forced innovation in many Media projects like movies which were constantly having production issues like Jaws, or Games barely limping past releasing like the Bloodlines game in 2004 - so too does having a separate cultural influence have imposed a type of restriction which jumpstarts a type of writing innovation.
So had movies like Seven Samurai become the most influential film ever to hail from Japland.
BASILISK (2005) REVIEW:
I never had the opportunity to actually watch all of the shows which had Aired on Animax, between 2005 - 2012, because many of the shows literally only showed between midnight and 6 in the morning, these were the really HARDCORE and EDGY shows like Deathnote, and had a 16-Age-Rating!!
Deathnote back in 2006-2008 only ever aired after 10PM on Saturdays on Animax, so I always hoped the Saturday movie would finish soon enough, so that my parents would frick off and go to bed early enough, so that I would sneak back into the TV room and watch the cartoon in the dark, and with the sound low, cuz I knew my uber conservative parents would NEVER allow us to watch such Satanic shit. I'm still salty at having been forbidden to see Aliens-Versus-Predator......
Other even more HARCORE shows like Basilisk, had the extremely rare DSTV age rating of 18R!!11!! And thus was never allowed to be aired outside of the rare midnight-6AM slot. What random Horror movie crap did you guyz watch without your parent's consent dramatards??
Now more than 15 years later when I have complete independence from my parents and conservative community, and have disposable income, so I can afford my own fiber-internet
and pirate whatever my heart desires, and because I haven't watched good movies from HollyWoke, I could finally indulge going back and seeing if any of the anime Slop from Safrican
Animax was worth a darn.
========
Well amongst all the garbage like Chrono Crusade (don't watch this shit), and extremely mediocre slop like Burst Angel, I found one show which surprised me, and took me aback in how good it was. And also how it demonstrates how fricking tasteless most weebs are, becuase there is like ZERO
fanart or discussion from old forums or new about Basilisk (2005) - while other crap from 2005 have much higher awareness in weeb circles - it's like weebs are incapable of recognizing quality
https://old.reddit.com/r/anime/comments/14rxmpv/the_anime_called_basilisk/
The premise: The year is 1614 AD, and two Ninja clans hate each other's guts, for like 400 hundred subsequent years. Except our two lovebird protagonists whom are our Nip Romeo and Juliette, and these two just can't catch a break, as outside forces conspire to pit the clans into a mutually destructive nightmare conflict.
Imagine it being like Naruto, if it wasn't straggy and lame, and actually focused on the queer strange ninja magic nonsense. It may even be compared to Ninja Scrolls or Vampire Hunter D.
Throughout the 24 Episodes, 10 ninjas on each side will slaughter each other
in a Battle Royale, and great deal of action will follow.
The show has a couple of great strengths. The animation is a God-Tier quality. Extremely fluid motion for both action scenes and mundane happenings - non of that BS where Jap animators will like have still frames for 30 seconds, and literally nothing but the mouths will move during dialogue, to save costs.
The Dub (i dont watch subs cuz I'm not a
Libertarian) is also S-tier, as good as that of the Dubs of Cowboy Bebop or Deathnote. And this is topped by a very grand soundtrack score. Somber music for the inevitable tragedies and action tunes.
What also makes the show stand out, is how in comparisons, to other shonen slop, Basilisk is very economical with its runtime. There are only like 2 flashbacks in the series, and there are no hype-chats where the opposing parties tell how fricking baddass they are for 3 episodes instead of fighting. People die very quickly and suddenly and with no warning, and it is NEVER obvious which warrior will come out on top. Thus Basilisk keeps you on your toes, as to whom will perish next up until the very final 24th episode.
A MASSIVE refreshing turn of storytelling compared to the overplayed modern anime shit of telegraphing whom is gonna be victorious in Shonen shit. The thing which anime excels at compared to Western Shows - the weird and strange supernatural powers which individuals possess is also displayed at its best here, but no one individual is invulnerable - there is never a bullshit moment where the Main Character or Bossman nr. 3000 is just gonna be boringly invulnerable
until the story says they get to die
Just nonstop action and a contest of brutality for 24 Episodes. Did i mention it's only 24 Episodes? Yeah, the show ends when it ends, and doesn't frick with your time.
Also it's very very violent and EDGY. There's 3 attempted r*pes, and two SUCCESSFUL r*pes onscreen so....uh, Trigger warning.
Also, apparently it got a sequel season, DON'T WATCH IT It's very very bad
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/2000121-anime-and-manga-other-titles/76869044
Anyways, that's it
- CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM : PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP
- 77
- 223
Marsey has been spending a lot of time alone, thinking about things that make her sad. She looks like she's about to cry...
This Marsey is based on one of my favorite Marseys, @X's
, which itself is based on a Peach cat animation. And yes, I referenced my own Marsey (
).
As usual, I made different variants. I will submit the first 7 for 1750 dramacoin. If you have suggestions, be sure to comment them.
The letters were originally to the left of the Marseys, but I moved them to the right about 6 hours after making the post to make it less confusing for mobile.
I also made sleeping and crying variants that didn't come out the way I wanted. I may or may not submit these. I added J because of @DWHITE___________DYNAMITE.
Which ones are your favorite?
(Drawn using Inkscape, inspired by and referenced , also referenced
and
)
- 5
- 13
Drop episodes. Watching s22 ep12 rn
- DickButtKiss : Thee smallest amount of hydration u can survive on is the healthiest, anything more is excess
- DK_KD : The human body wasn't meant to survive on anything but Pepsi Max
- anonymousm : i have drank nothing but bloxy cola for the past 999999999 years
- 45
- 86
Are there actual health benefits of drinking more water?
Publicly released: Tue 26 Nov 2024 at 0300 AEDT | 0500 NZDT
We often get told we should drink more water, but US experts say the actual benefits of increasing water consumption are not well established, so they set out to review the evidence that drinking more water is good for you. They found that while there is a limited number of clinical trials, a small number of studies did suggest increasing your water intake has benefits for weight loss and kidney stones. There were also individual studies which they say raise the possibility of benefits for migraine prevention, UTIs, diabetes control, and low blood pressure. They say that given how cheap and safe water is, we should have more well-designed studies to assess the benefits of drinking more water for these conditions.
If you drank water before today, in any amount at all, you are nothing more than a pseudoscience peddling witch doctor twink.
Thank you Neil.
Thank you Bill.
Thank you the other Bill.
Thank you Asian Dude.
Thank you Newton.
WATER IS GOOD FOR YOU TO DRINK
LK-99ers would be on suicide watch, but they're all dead. From suicide.
- DickButtKiss : Erection day*
- 119
- 112
Kamalasister seethe:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1002
https://lolcow.farm/ (this is actually a leftist site, first time I saw a left-leaning image board)
https://littlegreenfootballs.com/
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/
https://old.reddit.com/r/pics/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/
https://old.reddit.com/r/europe/
https://old.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/
https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/
https://nitter.poast.org/stealthygeek
Chud spergout:
https://scored.co/c/consumeproduct/
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/General-Discussion/5/
https://freerepublic.com/home.htm
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/
https://old.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/
https://old.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/
Local subs:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Pennsylvania/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Cleveland/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Detroit/
Unsorted :
https://old.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/
https://old.reddit.com/r/SocialistRA/
https://old.reddit.com/r/TheDeprogram/
https://old.reddit.com/r/fivethirtyeight/
https://old.reddit.com/r/liberalgunowners/
Please add more places to keep an eye on
- 2
- 3
I saw the face of God,
It was a thing neverending,
My eyes forever trying to grasp,
Cast adrift, a visage too vast to hold.
/
It was a thing without angles, edges, or depth,
It was a thing from a time long before them,
It was the first time I felt grateful,
To possess a mind too feeble, to comprehend.
/
My good man, the man of science,
He was not so lucky a soul,
Somehow the ant managed to grasp,
A single crevice and hold on, for but a moment.
/
A moment I will never understand,
'cept for this, the man was changed,
I could not sense it right then,
'cept for the stars that now felt too cold to bear.
/
We walked back to the car,
And traveled down an hours long road, without break,
We couldn't even drift our eyes away no longer,
And so carried on in silence, staring at our hands.
/
We parted ways without a word,
And as I said, I was fortunate,
That I could not comprehend,
And so I went about life,
With the additional knowledge of "don't go there. Don't frick with that."
/
My good man of science on the other hand,
They say he disappeared,
and after months of searching,
There still hasn't been a trace.
/
That's not the worst that bothers me though,
It is the fact that I at times must pass through his town,
And more and more people now I see,
Prefer to stare at the ground, unwilling to recognize the stars.
/
I think he brought back some understanding with him,
And now it is in the very ground where he lived,
But thankfully I am just an average fool,
And all I need to know about the place," Don't go there. Don't frick with that."
/
Lucky me, I know a few other routes that skip the town entirely.
- 2
- 20
- 38
- 85
Where the GOP abandons the old southern strategy republicans over time and transforms into a diverse technocrat bro party, while the Democrats return to being the party of racism, the KKK and sexism and icky mayo white bios and abandons wokeism, DEI, black people, and their old base. Would be hilarious lmao.
- 14
- 28
This is the person who was being very evil pic.twitter.com/KQLg7aEXz6
— MaryShelleyStepOnMe (@_MSSOM_) February 17, 2025
on the one hand dasha weighed in and i want to frick dasha so im inclined to agree
She must be very unhappy, I'm sorry she is lashing out at you
— dasha (@dash_eats) February 17, 2025
but on the other hand the person who made the reddit post is called lana and lana is a hot name too
what is the correct take here
- 27
- 39
I was recently contacted by an anonymous source that Capy J. Nohonorsworth III, who poses as a humble website """provider""" is actually a ripoff artist.
I have received tips (not plural, just one) that aevann probably isn't the cool guy we all thought he was.
I forget what he was accused of, but it was prolly true. That, my journ*listic crede rests upon.
Think twice before giving capy any bux.