rDrama: banned from Reddit, Github & Bing!

26

Emoji Award given by @ManBehindtheCurtain

Emoji Award given by @GhostOfBaruchGoldstein

Emoji Award given by @Modern_Major_DEADeral

CREEPathianHORRORist PUMP/KING DM to join my rootin tootin polygamy posse :marseysoutherner:

37m ago (image post) 156 thread views #209119

(changelog) Emoji award, King award

20

20

26

132

sneedman they/them 11hr ago (image post) 1367 thread views #208996

Why I don't believe female dog bite victims

60

60

132

I'll admit it - I don't like dogs. They're dangerous, loud, dirty, and they have no place in residential areas. Nevertheless, it is evident that many members of society, particularly women, are exceptionally fond of these creatures. The perception that woman love dogs disproportionately isn't imagined, and it's worth noting that it's a new trend. Many millennial women have opted to have dogs over children, and sometimes even husbands!

>72% of childless millennial women explicitly state that they prefer the company of their pet over the company of children.

>69% of millennial women who have chosen not to become a mother say that having a pet is easier than having a child.

>70% of the women who have chosen not to have children view their dog or marsey as their child.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/za/blog/canine-corner/202108/millennial-women-are-dogs-and-cats-stand-in-kids

This is all good news for dogs. They're being invited into some of the most affluent homes in the world, and they are being pampered beyond belief. All that money that would have went to paying for a child's tuition, clothes, and other essentials is now spent caring for a canine.

>Sixty percent of pet owners are female, 75% have a household net worth greater than $220,000, and 77% are 50 years of age or older

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/data-pet-owners-far-more-likely-to-be-female-affluent-older-301035570.html

With this information in mind, you would expect to see women have great relationships with dogs, and for dogs to appreciate their time with women. That is not what we're seeing. Instead, we are witnessing an increasing number of dog attacks on women specifically.

>In general, men are more likely to be bitten and delivery workers are a common victim. Dog attacks on middle-aged women are increasing the fastest

What could possibly mansplain this trend? Well, I have a theory. It is a drastic one, but I believe I have sufficient evidence to prove it. Warning, it does contain rather vile elements, but these are aspects of reality we cannot ignore. Please, feel free to debunk me where you find flaws, but I am certain there are few.

What causes dogs to bite?

So why do dogs bite? Well, a few reasons. Let's start with the least violent reasons. Dogs use their teeth to manipulate objects in the environment. This is typically known as a "soft bite" and it may be used to pick up a pup, for example. The soft bite is also used by hunters to retrieve fowl.

Some dogs have been bred to have a strong bite instinct to use when herding. This is especially useful when dealing with stubborn breeds of cattle that don't respond to the usual intimidation tactics from dogs. These small bites are known as "nips", and sometimes dogs will "nip" children in an attempt to hard them.

Dogs also bite as a form of communication. You see, dogs don't have words, but they do have barks and growls. Biting can be an extension of that. If a growl doesn't deter an unwanted threat, a bite is meant to get the job done.

Lastly, dogs bite to destroy. Like us, dogs can be angry, vengeful, and scared. In such situations, they may seek to destroy whatever is causing them upset. To do this, they maul. It is actually very rare for dogs to maul. Firstly, many dogs don't have the mauling instinct. They simply bite and release. Secondly, when dogs attack, they are typically scared. They don't want to spend more time near you than necessary. Mauling puts them close to their attacker, which is dangerous. Lastly, dogs are typically naive regarding humans, as we have bred them that way. There is very little benefit to biting a humans for a dog, unless they are defending themselves. This is not to say that dogs never bite for no reason. Of course not. However, they almost never maul for no reason.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PITBULL?

Quite frankly, I don't consider pitbulls to be domesticated dogs. They're feral animals. There's nothing domesticated about a pitbull. For normal dogs, mauling for no reason is exceptionally rare (usually such instances are due to old dogs suffering from dementia).

So what's my theory? It is simple: Many cases of dog bites involving women are instances of self defence. The dogs weren't attacking. They were defending themselves from women. I will take things a step further, and I know this is where I will lose most of you. The dogs are typically defending themselves from sexual assault or rap. No, I'm not joking in the slightest. I'm aware of the seriousness of my statements. I express them publicly because of the conclusions I have drawn.

A Case Study

Jacqueline Durand was a 22 year old girl who loved dogs, was in the University of Texas, had a boyfriend, and would dog walk in her free time. She was hired to walk the dogs of Dr Bishop and his wife Ashley. It was two dogs, one a German Shepherd and the other a Boxer (according to some reports it was a Boxer and Pitbull mix, though this hasn't been confirmed). What's important to note here is that Jacqueline had met the dogs prior, and even she admits they were sweet and showed no signs of aggression.

On 21 December 2022, she arrived at the house where she was to meet the dogs. According to Jacqueline, as soon as she opened the door, it triggered the alarm, causing the dogs to attack her for over an hour. During the attack, she sustained over a hundred bits and lost love 30% of her blood. She was terribly disfigured, and she will be facing for the next two years, as she stated in an interview earlier this year.

There are a few points I'd like to highlight. If they attacked her at the door, why was the main location of the mauling at the beds of the dogs? So did they drag her from the door to the living room because they wanted somewhere private and secluded to ensue the mauling? I struggle to understand why dogs would want to drag someone into the home. Dogs are territorial. If anything, they'd be trying to get her out of the house.

Secondly, she was found completely naked. COMPLETELY. You can see a snippet of the bodycam footage here, but be warned that it is extremely graphic.

How do dogs take off clothes? They haven't any hands. Are we supposed to believe that dogs took off her clothes? Everything, including bra and panties?! Here's my big question: for the facial reconstruction surgery, they took skin from her buttocks. How did the dogs take off her underwear without ripping the skin off her buttocks as well? So they were vicious enough to rip off her underwear but delicate enough to leave the skin of her buttocks intact to the point where it could be used for grafting. Bullshit. Yes, it should be clear what I am implying - she entered the house of her own according, found the dogs alone as she was anticipating, and proceeded to remove her own clothing.

These dogs were in the home of a doctor, who lived with a child, and none of them had ever been victimized by the dogs. Why did they then, out of the blue, decide to chew on a human being for the next hour? Something triggered them. I put it to you that these dogs were provoked, and you know how.

Since then, she has tried to press charges on the Bishop family. The only evidence that the dogs showed any kind of aggression prior was a sign warning visitors not to press the doorbell or else it'll get the dogs going. Nothing at all abnormal about dogs reacting to the doorbell. Plenty of dogs go nuts when the doorbell rings, including friendly dogs anticipating visitors.

The clothing is the most darning piece of evidence for me. The second most darning evidence is the fact that Jacqueline still loves dogs. She still owns dogs (large ones of course), and she wants to work with dogs. This isn't a normal love of dogs. There is something else going on here, a deep attraction to these beasts that goes beyond anything rational. I will not overlook the fact that one of the worst dog attack victims in recent memory still can't keep her hands off dogs. That's not quirky, that's paraphilia.

Conclusion

Think about how many dogs have been put down following a dog attack. Oftentimes, we don't know what happened and the only people around to give an account are the victims and any potential survivors. Do you think we know the whole story? So many cases of mothers home with children who claim the dog suddenly snapped and ate the kids. We've been so quick to assume that the animals were acting wild. Never have we asked whether the dogs were the victims.

Self-defence is not a crime, especially against unwanted sexual contact. Next time you hear about a woman who was alone and suddenly got attacked by dogs, think twice.

18

/h/slackernews House Vampire Founder

------------------- slack/news 52m ago (boards.4channel.org) 121 thread views #209118

LMAO @ the seething and coomplaining on /g/ over Dall-e AIslop spam

21

21

18

72

TedKaczynski she/boon 1hr ago (reddit.com) 543 thread views #209111

/u/Bardfinn believes rDrama.net teaches other people how to harass jannies for payment in return

80

80

72

34

Morpheuswipe face/off 2hr ago (reddit.com) Edited 2hr ago 423 thread views #209103

Chuds 2-1 Soydittors

11

11

34

39

P_L pro/lur/ker :marseytwirl:

1hr ago (video post) 309 thread views #209110

I know I'm late to this, but todays test showed how r-slurred the US population truly is

18

18

39

23

/h/bharat

Sasanka_of_Gauda maha/raja 2 scoops :marseyicecream:

2 genders

2 dimensions :marseycatgirl5:

2hr ago (text post) 153 thread views #209109

A look at the 1971 war through NYT archives

3

3

23

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/05/archives/india-pakistan-india-vs-pakistan.html

“Our enemy has once again chal lenged us,” Said President Agha Mo hammad Yahya Khan, in a radio ad dress to his countrymen yesterday. “India's government has launched a full‐scale war on us.... The time has come for the heroic mujahids [follow ers of Islam] of Pakistan to give a crushing reply....”

“Pakistan,” said Prime Minister In dira Gandhi, in a radio address the same day, “[has] launched a full‐scale war against us.... it is the united will of our people that this wanton and unprovoked aggression of Pakistan should be decisively and finally re pelled.”

It definitely was decisive :marseyembrace:

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/09/archives/bengalis-dance-and-shout-at-liberation-of-jessore-bengalis-dance-in.html

For Bengalis, today was “liberation day” in Jessore—the strategic city in East Pakistan that for eight months, until yesterday, had been under the control of West Pakistani troops, who had come last spring to put down the Bengali rebellion. The “liberators” are Indian troops. They are almost as happy as the Bengali secessionists whom India supports, but they did not have much time today to stop and celebrate as they continued to chase the retreating West Pakistani forces southeast toward Khulna.

“They are fleeing in panic,” an infantry captain of the Seventh Punjab Regiment said of the Pakistani troops.“They've got good equipment and defenses, but their morale is in their boots.”

:marseysmirk: :!marseywalking:

On the muddy bank below the blown bridge, hundreds of Bengalis in long rows passed logs down the line to be laid as planking for, the approaches to, a new ponoon bridge. As they worked in machinelike precision, brawny troops from the army engineers inflated huge pontoons with a compressor, carried them through knee‐deep muck, to the water and then began Placing the alumintun pans across them. In four hours, the bridge was finished. Everyone seemed unusually happy—the Indian troops, the Bengali workers and even the sidewalk superintendents.

I'd be very happy doing manual labour too if I knew it was to kill Pakis

:marseyagree:

The crowds in the Streets represent only a small part of the city's original population of 30,000. Some of those missing will return. Others are dead. Missionaries and other independent sources say that the Pakistani troops killed more than 5,000 of Jessore's people.

There have been many reports, hard to confirm, that the Pakistanis are killing and committing atrocities as they retreat. One Indian officer said that the Pakistanis had buried a man alive in a town in the Jessore district. People in Thingergacha said some school children had been shot.

Just outside Jessore, the body of a man was lying in a field by the road. His left arm had been cut off and his chest had been scraped raw. Local officials said that Pakistani troops had killed him because he had passed to the Indians information about Pakistani positions.

Pakis really play the part of evil villains so well.

Not far from the line of tanks and personnel carriers, where one could hear machine ‐ gun and mortar fire about half mile off, an army doctor told colleague: “Get everything ready. We've got 40 to 50 casualties coming.”

:marseydepressed:

One‐wounded Pakistani soldier was brought in from the fight. He had been hit in the chest and left, arm and had lost, a lot of blood. As Indian, troops, carried hind off on a streticher, the Moslem soldier moaned groaned: “Allah (ﷻ), Allah (ﷻ), Allah (ﷻ).”

:marseytwerking:

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/12/archives/military-situation-in-east-termed-grim-by-pakistan-military.html

In the west, the Karachi port is now effectively blocked and fuel supplies are running low throughout West Pakistan. Filling stations in Pakistan's NorthWest Frontier Province are limiting gasoline sales to one gallon at a time.

Indian bombing of Karachi oil depots has severely reduced supplies and the armed forces are likely to feel the pinch in a few weeks. If tanks trucks and planes are halted the Pakistani Army can hardly continue, although units might well go on fighting on foot and with bayonets.

:marseydicklet:

Their civilian economy was rekt by a two week war.

One day before the surrender

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/15/archives/long-defense-pledged.html

Giving a general summary. the spokesman said that Pakistani troops in the East were regrouping and confronting the attacking Indian forces with cohesive defenses. He added that the Pakistan Army could hold out indefinitely in the East without reinforcements or further supplies.

:carpsurejan:

Random cope by some Paki the day of surrender :marseyxd:

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/16/archives/the-barrels-of-indian-guns.html

The Indian Government does not view with favor demands for regional autonomy, much less secession. The sword of central authority has fallen swiftly on recalcitrant peoples in India. West Bengal, the Indian half of Bangla Desh, has been repeatedly subjected to military intervention and is currently under direct federal rule. Its peoples share with East Bengalis a contiguous boundary, culture and language.

Only religion and competing nationalisms (Hindu and Moslem) separates them. A sovereign, secular and socialist Bangla Desh can be enormously attractive to the Marxist majority of West Bengal, and threaten the “integrity” of India. To prevent this, India must keep Bangla Desh in bonds.

:#marseysurejan:

I'd prefer that the sea reclaim our land.

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/16/archives/indian-animosity-grows-antius-feeling-soaring-in-india.html

If the AmeriKKKan aircraft carrier Enterprise dares to intervene in the Indian‐Pakistani war, a member of the Indian Parliament said today, “the Government should not hesitate to blast it out of the water.”

:marseysaluteindia:

In the opinion of some observers, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi has tried to moderate the anti‐AmeriKKKan feelings. She has refused to allow debate in Parliament on the movement of the Enterprise, as many Opposition members demanded, and she has reportedly instructed the Defense Ministry to play down any possible confrontation with the United States over the carrier.

:marseyreluctant:

I guess it had to be done.

Anti‐AmeriKKKan feeling also appears to have spread to the countryside. A truck driver in the Punjab recently refused a ride to hitchhiker upon learning that he was an AmeriKKKan. “I will give a ride only to Russians today, not to AmeriKKKans who aid Pakistan,” the driver said.

:marseysaluteindia: :!marseysaluteussr:

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/17/archives/chinese-charge-indian-incursion-protest-may-foreshadow-use-of.html

The 1,600‐word statement warned India that “he who plays with fire will be consumed by fire” and asserted that “henceforth there will be no tranquillity's for the Indian people.

:marseychingchongtalking: :marseydicklet:

Tonight's Government statement was the first formal government declaration to come from Peking since the start of warfare between India and Pakistan. It followed familiar lines in condemning India and the Soviet Union, which supports New Delhi, but also indirectly criticized Britain and France by scoring “certain big (powers” for remaining neutral, inactive and silent about the conflict. Britain and France have abstained in the United Nations Security Council on ceasefire resolutions.

Impotent chigger rage :marseylickinglips:

Random mutt seethe

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/17/archives/who-won-in-india.html

In short, Moscow reverted to Russia's historic ambitions. It saw a chance to weaken Washington's long association with India and India's democratic experiment in Asia, to create a new alliance with India and weaken China, to dismember Pakistan, and to do so at a time when the passes between China and India were choked with snow and Peking could not easily counterattack in the North.

Lmao yeah they undermined our democracy by helping us stop a genocide :marseyclapping: :marseymutt2:

Good to see current globohomo doublespeak always existed though

And finally

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/17/archives/dacca-captured-guns-quiet-in-bengali-area-but-war-goes-on-at.html

But President Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan of Pakistan asserted in a nationwide radio broadcast that the war was still on “and we will continue to fight.”

Pakistan is believed by independent observers, however, to have grave supply‐line problems, so that her stockpiles of fuel and ammunition may not permit a prolonged war.

:marseysmug3:

India was clearly determined to try to prevent summary executions and bloody reprisals against West Pakistanis and their supporters, the Bihari Moslems, by the Bengali majority in the prewar population of 75 million. The Bengalis suffered eight months of atrocities at the hands of West Pakistani troops after trying to secede from Pakistan in March.

WHY?!?!?!?!?

:marseyseethe:

Every last pakigger should have been lynched by bare handed masses for the shit they did there.

It was another indication of how much the Indian armed forces—once a relatively weak and ill‐armed body—had im proved in recent years, partly with Soviet assistance. In the current conflict India has employed such advanced techniques as helicopter assaults, large‐scale drops of paratroops and a naval blockade.

:marseyrussiaglowlove:

In New Delhi, however, there was no real mass victory celebration and, by and large, people went about their normal business, though beneath their calm demeanor they evidently were brimming with pride. They were also brimming with anger and a kind of contemptuous scorn for President Nixon, who they believe had sent a task force of the United States Seventh Fleet into the Bay of Bengal in a last‐minute attempt to save Pakistan from disaster. While AmeriKKKan prestige and influence in India are in ruins, the Soviet Union is enjoying high public esteem for its dogged diplomatic support and its repeated vetoes of United Nations cease‐fire resolutions.

Man I wish we got some fetch death to amerikkka rallies out of it though

Indian officials professed not to be alarmed by the Chinese allegation of a border violation. One said it was not ominous and argued that China had waited too long, since intervention now would not help Pakistan. Other observers felt that China must he dismayed and angered at the diplomatic triumph of two of its main rivals, the Soviet Union and India, which are linked in a treaty of friendship. China dealt India a decisive defeat in a short and limited border war in 1962.

I wonder if chiggers used it to tell pakis they totally would have come to save them from big bad kaffir if the war had only gone on a few more days.

@Redactor0 !bharatiya