- 27
- 77
update: the food bank bandit was fired https://t.co/RFLqvVGJb1 pic.twitter.com/CDdrfrmbqI
— pagliacci the hated 🌝 (@Slatzism) April 22, 2024
- 1
- 4
Woke up and downed a glass of vodka drunk me wanted to drink instead of my normal glass of water placed on my nightstand. Didn't realize until the burn kicked in so frick it, today's going to be a day. Yay to throwing up later today and ruining my plans to goomble.
- 7
- 12
Liam Neeson is in it too. Im kinda hopeful about this tbh assuming they dont make it too slapstick
- 9
- 15
This is a recording from an official conference/workshop/whatever for xorg- something that is used by most Linux distributions for their desktop environment, so it's not some small or unknown project by any means.
I won't mention anything else, just skip around the video and tell me if you notice anything
- 4
- 8
OFFICIAL TRAILER: Fishtank All-Stars Vampire Bloodgames
— fishtank (@fishtankislive) May 10, 2024
Airs June 1st
Only on https://t.co/lKUk14lt6A pic.twitter.com/9ux5cS7xLe
Big promises from Sam and the crew:
- 25
- 19
The couple, who live in Steele, Alabama, had been trying to have a child for more than two years, but Bentley's doctor had told her that she may be unable to conceive because of her history of polycystic ovary syndrome, known as PCOS.
The news had left her feeling without a purpose. "That's all I wanted to be was a mom and a wife," said Bentley, 25. "I was depressed, severely depressed for that whole time."
but when i feel like that, then it's a fetish or something.
- 33
- 19
- 4
- 15
BJP leader Vinay Mehar shared a video on social media in which his child is seen pressing the EVM button to vote for the BJP candidate from Bhopal. Is this a joke? Use of mobile phone is prohibited inside polling stations. Be it Assam, Gujarat or Madhya Pradesh, @ECISVEEP sleeps? pic.twitter.com/4CAW8mmy9M
— Abhishek (@AbhishekSay) May 9, 2024
- 17
- 17
This post is brought to you by @JohnnyBOO who hit the posting limit.
- 13
- 46
- 21
- 69
T-Mobile, Verizon, and AT&T will pay a combined $10.2 million in a settlement with US states that alleged the carriers falsely advertised wireless plans as "unlimited" and phones as "free." The deal was announced yesterday by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
"A multistate investigation found that the companies made false claims in advertisements in New York and across the nation, including misrepresentations about 'unlimited' data plans that were in fact limited and had reduced quality and speed after a certain limit was reached by the user," the announcement said.
T-Mobile and Verizon agreed to pay $4.1 million each while AT&T agreed to pay a little over $2 million. The settlement includes AT&T subsidiary Cricket Wireless and Verizon subsidiary TracFone.
The settlement involves 49 of the 50 US states (Florida did not participate) and the District of Columbia. The states' investigation found that the three major carriers "made several misleading claims in their advertising, including misrepresenting 'unlimited' data plans that were actually limited, offering 'free' phones that came at a cost, and making false promises about switching to different wireless carrier plans.
Wew lad That's over $200k per state! It can even be used to cover lawyers fees and discovery costs in a case that took 9 years in court. Yuge government win here, folks!
The three carriers agreed that all advertisements to consumers must be "truthful, accurate and non-misleading." They also agreed to the following changes, the NY attorney general's office said:
"Unlimited" mobile data plans can only be marketed if there are no limits on the quantity of data allowed during a billing cycle.
Offers to pay for consumers to switch to a different wireless carrier must clearly disclose how much a consumer will be paid, how consumers will be paid, when consumers can expect payment, and any additional requirements consumers have to meet to get paid.
Offers of "free" wireless devices or services must clearly state everything a consumer must do to receive the "free" devices or services.
Offers to lease wireless devices must clearly state that the consumer will be entering into a lease agreement.
All "savings" claims must have a reasonable basis. If a wireless carrier claims that consumers will save using its services compared to another wireless carrier, the claim must be based on similar goods or services or differences must be clearly explained to the consumer.
I bet that will learn them!