OP

Canadian here. Not sure if this is PreperIntel worthy but just reporting something I've honestly never seen in my life. Canadians woke up today feeling super patriotic. And super pissed. Not that we aren't usually patriotic but we aren't a bunch of flag wavers. It's more a quiet patriotism we keep to ourselves. And we are generally a polite and reserved bunch in general.

Not today. Holy... the mood in Canada is ... PISSED.

Most of the anger is aimed at your current head of state but also at your country as a whole. Not so much individual Americans. You will be perfectly safe traveling through Canada or visiting. But there is outright anger directed at any product with a "Made in the USA" flag. Every store in Canada is going around with maple leaf stickers marking the "Made in Canada" products. Consumer boycotts are springing up organically across the country. The talk is really sort of ... ugly.

I get the sense there has been significant damage done to the US Brand in Canada. And I don't think it's confined to Canada. I have friends in the UK who say the same. They are also just frankly pissed beyond all reason. I expect it's the same across Europe.

Hopefully it dies down. It's absolutely non-productive and unCanadian. America and Canada have been ride or die BFF's for a century or more. I live in Arizona 1/2 time and I love LOVE it here. I have yet to personally meet an American I didn't genuinely like. You are good people. You do not deserve any of this.

Unless of course you voted for this. In which case... hope you get everything you voted for and then some.

also RIP to /r/prepperintel, it has turned into just another 'Drumf le bad' subreddit

TNF, 2 Saturday games (1 and 4:30pm), 7 Sunday early games, 4 afternoon, 1 primetime, and 1MNF game.

Playoff odds via nfl.com (your team is still in the race, right anon?)

Finally for those keeping track, here's a excel spreadsheet I've been using to track gambling wins/losses. Column A has the winner of their matchup (listed in the same order I list them for this thread, B is the gross Payout , C needs to be filled with a 1 if you won that bet, and a 0 if you lost. So it will be easy to track your weekly and seasonal gains/losses. Prior threads: week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12, week 13, week 14, week 15

pings: !mensfootball !goomblers !bets @IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUS @Freak-Off @Drippo as always if you want to get @'ed and don't want to join those ping groups, just ask. We love our gamblers. @SpudsMackenzie Gamble here if you need more opportunities.

Thursday Night Football is

Enter BetBroncos - 5,400 total betted

Enter BetChargers - 2,200 total betted - WINNER!

closed

His Xitter Account

Lol:

I'm really tired but I can't sleep, how is that even possible

Mouse🖱 #今日は何の日#マウスの誕生日 pic.twitter.com/pftDChHigY

— parico (@parirobo) December 9, 2024

A lot of foids feel unsafe here with the level of harassment we allow and the predators we've had run rampant here. What are some ways we can make this website foid safe?

oil lamp pic.twitter.com/olSspWcrLv

— Skitty卡特 (@theskittycat) February 6, 2025

People who are using apps have been vocal about how much the experience sucks. Hinge seems especially awful to me with its limited number of photos, lame prompts, limit on likes per day, and keeping your "best" matches behind a pay wall.

Imagine foids don't have enough likes to give it to all top 1% guys and top 0,0001% guys are pay locked.

Frick life of foids is hard.

I want to combine Facebook dating with OkCupid. I think Facebook gives you ample room to write about yourself, and it gives you more than enough photo slots. I love that you can see if you have mutual friends with someone. I'd mix that with the part of OKC where you answer questions and that give you a compatibility percentage. Unfortunately, both of those platforms are very unpopular in my area, so I have to deal with Hinge & Tinder.

Every guy knows that foids don't give shit about it. They will read is if you are absolutely Chad but if you are absolutely Chad you already getting like from her since to foids guys they like are automatically funny

I'm curious about what a better dating app experience would look like to others.

PostWall inc

I agree about filters. Even when you pay to apply the filters, it still shows you people outside of the filters you've set and just highlights the people who match the preferences you've set. To me, something like childfree or monogamous is non-negotiable, so showing me people outside of that is just a waste.

App be like: b-word your filters are so extreme, why not look at this decent guy (that probably won't like your flobs back)

childfree or monogamous is non-negotiable

Why would a successful good looking 34 year old man would want a fat 34 year old sterile foid and be monogamous to her ?

And I know many of you won't question her being fat

https://old.reddit.com/r/PlusSize/comments/1hd0u8n/sometimes_i_think_i_like_plus_size_women_actually/

I've been in "romantic" relationships before where the man I was with wasn't physically attracted to me, and it was really painful to endure.

And we know he was in shape

The problem is, though, that too many of the men I've talked to who say they prefer plus-size women have been awful. They've rushed to talk about s*x

She also don't understand supply and demand curves. There so many fat foids supply and so few demand and such guys are working hard

To make sure all fat chicks get some D

I feel so stupid even asking this, but are there actually decent people out there who are more attracted to a size 16 than a size 6? Because I'm having suuuch a hard time finding someone who likes my body and is also capable of just being kind & normal to me and not scaring me or sexualizing me too much too soon.

Yes there are decent people like 1 such guy for 50 size 16 kwins and if she has green card to share.

https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1fb6bpa/why_i_stopped_asking_men_on_dates/

When I was single, this was my experience as well. I would always hear men say "We want to be asked out too" but what they don't say is that they only want to be asked out by women they find attractive. Otherwise they will freak out, be upset or get weirded out.

My experience as well. That look of disgust they get that an average woman like myself dare think they be interested, or even I dare be attracted to them lol. I've asked out plenty of men in my early 20s and pretty regularly rejected-gives you thick skin. But unfortunately socially, we are not at a place where women have equal footing when doing the approaching. Now I don't approach-if he's interested he'll approach me.

I actually were approached by shit tons of fat foids and it always surprised me like I always looked at them and was thinking (wow she is a foot smaller than me and weight more than me, why is she even approaching me ? We look like cartoon troop of tall and skinny person and fat and short)

Especially this

I saw this:

• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/snow_bunny

2. (Canada, US, slang) A young, attractive, female skier; a sexually active young woman attracted to the promiscuous après-ski way of life.

naturally, I looked it up immediately:

• https://www.google.com/search?q=the+promiscuous+apr%C3%A8s-ski+way+of+life

VICE confirmed it's foids slooting, whether rich or poor I just wanted to see the term used somewhere:

"while, I went on a one-woman rampage, spending most of my days either up to my armpits in soap-suds and other people's pubic hair, having s*x with stoned, broke teenagers on Tabasco-soaked mattresses"

https://www.vice.com/en/article/belle-de-neige-ski-underbelly/#:~:text=while%2C%20I%20went%20on%20a%20one%2Dwoman%20rampage%2C%20spending%20most%20of%20my%20days%20either%20up%20to%20my%20armpits%20in%20soap%2Dsuds%20and%20other%20people%E2%80%99s%20pubic%20hair%2C%20having%20sex%20with%20stoned%2C%20broke%20teenagers%20on%20Tabasco%2Dsoaked%20mattresses

For some reason I had to click at least one Reddit link before I backed out. This proved to be a good idea, shout-out to epic definition definer /u/Piper6728:

It originally meant after skiing social activity, but it eventually became lewd and sexual (in superman 3 evil superman used Après ski to screw a woman's brains out)

(in superman 3 evil superman used Après ski to screw a woman's brains out)

• https://old.reddit.com/r/skiing/comments/1b1tve9/serious_question_dont_attack_me_please_but_what/

Gemini explained the Superman III scene with this link

• https://imdb.com/title/tt0086393/quotes/?item=qt1763099&ref_=ext_shr_lnk

[Superman slowly walks into Lorelei's room]

Lorelei: How about a little après-ski?

[as Superman walks closer to Lorelei,]

Lorelei: Champagne?

[Superman proceeds to make out with Lorelei]

idk what to use it for but give me 100,000 DC

This figure will be well-known to abusers of ambien and benzos, word to @Sneedman.

also that , comma

Foundation's Edge (1982) is a science fiction novel by American writer Isaac Asimov, the fourth book in the Foundation Series. It was written more than thirty years after the stories of the original Foundation trilogy, due to years of pressure by fans and editors on Asimov to write another,[2] and, according to Asimov himself, the amount of the payment offered by the publisher.

This doesn't sound particularly promising.

This guy has me blocked and still writes me shit like this. pic.twitter.com/UVuGavvrhy

— Josh (@XJosh) January 5, 2025

direct link to fatrick tweet

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mad-at-the-internet.49299/post-20237740

recently I read a whore justify herself with evolution, and learned that the peepee displaces other men's c*m because we're born for free love. We're whores at heart, every womyn was a frick machine until fundies put us everywhere in chains.

This is based on a few studies, here's one

Results obtained by modifying an artificial peepee suggest that the coronal ridge is an important morphological feature mediating semen displacement...

basically they made fleshlights and tested how well the plastic peepee removed semen from the tube. that's the kind of hands-on science we know and love

but think about it, does semen really stay in there long enough that "displacing" after has a huge advantage? Certainly it's useful, but how much? insemination happens pretty quickly so the lingering sperm probably isn't going to inseminate her if the ejaculation didn't. And even then the rest is fully removed in five days. So either everyone was having Aella gangbangs, the returns are diminishing, or perhaps there's an alternative explanation.

The ones I found were "Structural Integrity" and "Pleiotropy" but those are anti-climactic

With the help of my friends, I've erected a fourth, and final, theory.

The blood plunger

BLOOD is a bigger barrier to insemination than sperm I think. Since we've not always had lovey-dovey foreplay for some enjoyable, LUBRICATED s*x, I imagine vaginal trauma was more common. I.e.

After all, what big "sexual ingredient" isn't necessary at all for impregnation?

That's right, the female orgasm.

Now look, I'm not exactly happy with this conclusion, I'm not an incel I have female friends, r*pe is bad.

But I do believe I'm onto something here for a PURELY MECHANICAL QUESTION without any ethical extensions.

A question posed and answered in the spirit of Die fröhliche Wissenschaft

In short, the blood produced during s*x would prevent or severely inhibit insemination, and the peepee plunges it out.

Have I convinced you?

Now I'm not a scientist, but I do know the contact information for the real scientists who've published the original studies, and I drafted the following:

I honestly just want to bounce this idea off you guys and get some help with the draft. how well would an academic receive this

Starts with post on /r/Brazil about the deported !macacos not having stewardess on their flight home

No Water Or AC On Flight, Handcuffed: How Brazilians Deported From US Reached Home

One Australian expat in Brazil asks

There are currently over 5,000 US citizens that are in Australia illegally as they have overstayed their visas. These aren't people claiming asylum, these are people who have deliberately broken Australian immigration law.

Can you imagine the outcry from Trump & his cronies if Australia put 100 of them on a plane, handcuffed & shackled & flew them back to the US?

The responses he gets from !burgers were not what he'd hoped

Well Australia should send them back if true

I fully support the US deporting illegal immigrants and I fully support other countries deporting Americans who have overstayed their visa and are thus illegal immigrants, they violated the law, I have no issue with them being handcuffed while they're returned to the US

I don't think Americans care, many would probably enjoy seeing them get deported.

Deport them.

Do it. If they've overstayed visas and aren't legally allowed in Australia anymore they should be sent home.

Most Americans wouldn't have any sympathy for them doing something stupid and illegal.

Kick them out if they are illegal.

Well, those 5,000 are probably unhappy about America, so you can keep them, deport them, what ever you want. America doesn't care.

I think Trump would nt have a problem with it

No outcry from me, what's fair is fair. They made an agreement and violated it.