(Dec 2023)

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

Luigi Mangione treatment. (610)

Frick off with that (-86)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

I mean it seems like the best move for self preservation (214)

Or they knew what was up and allowed it? (57)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘

Luigi Mangione treatment. (610)

Because prisoners are communist inspired terminally online anti capitalists. (-50)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I wonder how you arrived at this conclusion. Both are murderers, what's the basis for differentiating one as good and one as evil?She killed to avenge her daughter preyed upon by a monster, he killed to avenge millions preyed upon by the American healthcare monster. I don't think the understandably more turbulent emotions of the familial connection makes her a "good" person. (1)

The basis for differentiating a murderer as good or evil is who they killed. Is George Washington evil? He killed red coats, soldiers of a tyrannical government, but he still killed. Is Teddy Roosevelt evil? He killed people in his time as a Rough Rider, protecting American Freedom, but he still killed people. What makes Her or Luigi any different? They killed people, but bettered the world for it. (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Molesting means sexual assault, so yes, r*pe. I wish more cases were solved with the victim getting justice. None of those monsters should be allowed to live, even in jail. (313)

Not to step on toes but as someone who suffered childhood sexual abuse, I and many others consider "molesting" and "child r*pe" to refer to different acts. Molesting means to touch in a sexual manner, or engage in forced oral s*x whereas child r*pe is genital on genital penetration. (4)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

It's only a law because someone says it is. Life is a lot better when you quit bootlicking completely arbitrary rules in your day to day life.Of course, there needs to be rules and regulations with almost everything or people believe there would be chaos- but advocating for a normal mother who was just avenging their daughter- that's straight bootlicking miserable behavior. I'm sorry that your opinion sickens me so much, but really dude?So let's say the alternative (I know nothing about this case btw) if the suspect DIDNT murder but did everything else. The guy gets out of prison relatively quickly (because that's how our justice system works), what if they repeat the same acts a dozen more times and affect a dozen more lives. But people like you want to defend them, why? A lot of these people are sick in the head and will reoffend. And I just can't fathom hoping the mother got a life sentence. (-2)

Imagine the opposite. The dude on trial didn't do it and a woman kills him and then gets off on it. Not only is his murderer given freedom but he never gets the chance to prove his freedom.THIS is the problem with vigilante justice. Thousands of cases in America see innocent people thrown into prison for a plethora of reasons. Like seriously this week Ronnie Long, who had served 44 years in prison for a r*pe he didn't commit, was freed once evidence exonerated him. If his supposed victim's parent had killed him in court he'd never have been able to set the record straight.So, as respectfully as I can say, shut the frick up about bootlicking.P.S: My "hope" for her having a life sentence is more about vigilante justice not being rewarded. Because, if you give people a pass for vigilante justice... you just get more and more of that shit. If proper legal channels get it wrong so fricking often, how often do you think vigilante justice gets it wrong?A good example of this type of bullshit... (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/confusedandworried76

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🔘🔘

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

Heres Dreams charges tho:

Grand larceny auto theft

Grand larceny of greater than or equal to $1,000 not taken directly from another person

Credit card fraud of less than $1,000 in six-month period

Prostitution

Obtain credit card number — larceny

Grand larceny — stealing motor vehicle

[No image of the cop]

https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/hampton-officer-admits-to-hiring-prostitute-who-later-allegedly-stole-his-car-per-court-documents/

COP HAD A DREAM AND A DOLLAR

https://old.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/1i123ax/my_brother_got_converted_to_islam_at_16/

https://tiktok.com/@passrestprod/video/7459495066537561390

^^^here is the post, she seems a touch schizo

Canceling, hugboxes, dogpiling people, making everything political, all of this emerged from tumblr

Sending voice notes is a huge thing in brownoid culture because many of them are functionally illiterate. That’s where this behavior originates. https://t.co/NqfdQa8pjc

— Christiane F (@isa2001m) January 13, 2025

22-year-old Massachusetts man beat by college students after going to meet 18-year-old woman he met on dating app in “To Catch a Predator”-esque setup.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/cPOIzzn4mS

— AF Post (@AFpost) January 9, 2025

We can sleep safely knowing there are still decent people around like that who get rid of all these dangerous libertarians

Other articles: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna18650

https://local12.com/news/nation-world/students-allegedly-attempt-tiktok-frame-man-s*x-predator-in-how-to-catch-a-predator-stunt-chris-hansen-cincinnati-grandmothers-funeral-tinder-dating-romance-app-allegations-condemn-abhorrent-mission-values-mob-attack-underage-social-media

Some replies:

She was only 18

Remember that women under 25 are still minors

Why are zoomers so sensitive about this subject?

Official incels posting Ls

Raise the age of consent to 40

This I can get behind

You'd think the replies are reasonable until you dig deeper and see this guy

I'm 27 dating 19

Getting called a libertarian lol

Zoomers of reddit also can't comprehend this

But obviously if you sort by controversial you'll find gems about muh le power imbalance or saying they're middle schoolers (???)

More Reddit threads:

Stupid pol

Facepalm

Assmongol

i'm 25F and my roommate is 20M. it's important to mention that i am a lesbian in a relationship and he is gay. he has different guys coming in (usually at night), he plays music super loud at night when they come over, then after they leave he washes his sheets right before the next guy comes over. one night, me and my gf wanted to watch a movie in the living room and literally couldn't because we could hear him having very loud s*x. he brings in a min. 2 people a night. max: he has had 4 guys come through in one day. how do i bring this up without being disrespectful but still direct. i can understand being young and wild but god, having this many random guys in my apartment is so weird. i also know this because i installed a ring camera. its also gross because he uses my washer and dryer each time. honorable mention because maybe this is the root of my annoyance: he doesn't pay me for the light bill on time and he doesn't wash my dishes that he uses even though he has his own dishes

Its kinda that a 20 year old, already living on their own and is basically getting every night by multiple men.

And then they wonder why scrotes look at them as plague spreaders.

In-calls put you and him at risk of being robbed, assaulted, and worse. Get some extra cameras for the shared areas and your personal spaces, find an older gay mentor he'll listen to

>older gay mentor

I think a "gay older mentor" is what set him down this path, redditor.

Every other comment is apologia that starts with "s*x work is valid but..."

Some of them do get a little chuddy

https://old.reddit.com/r/badroommates/comments/1i0he2i/my_roomate_is_a_male_prostitute/m6xso6z/?context=8

ok I'm done copy/pasting quote comments, go your own.

Funny how anytime I read about lesbians/gays cohabiting spaces there is always issues not just being absolute degenerates, but always late on bills or never can be arsed to wash their own dishes.

!codecels

• bteter wokrspace suppwrot

• tbas in treminywl and fwile manayger

• added back in unzipping fwlies via the addwess bar

• better terminywl app

• better wsl2 supwport

• winget and sudwo fwor easy application instaww and update

• wooks less cwusty

"but the bwoat and spyware and AI!!" They adedd aww taht bcak inwto 10 cuck. Windwows is jsut slightwy getting a tatse of what Sun Workstatinos in the 90s had. Maeks u wonder howw cwsuty and unmanyageable the NT kernywl is.

Micwosowft swowwy fworcnig winstrags two use their P'Cs in a civiilzed way like Mac and KDE chads have been dwoing fwor years Windwows becwmoes better wen it adds in Linuyx features. !linuxchads

>sudwo winget ugpwade --aww

american tiktok users installing a chinese app (rednote) directly on their phone bc of the tiktok ban is hilarious pic.twitter.com/F9rfqarCLv

— 🐻‍❄️⁷ is happy (@userbfIy) January 13, 2025

ok I know it's probably like 10 people doing this but look how heckin cute and wholesome they are

please please please let this be how china wins think of how funny it would be omg

Today marks the first day I am unable to fly to DC for votes due to travel restrictions ahead of my due date.

It shouldn't be this way. Congress must pass my bipartisan resolution to allow Members who are new parents to vote remotely. pic.twitter.com/VyTcYpNhqS

— U.S. Rep. Brittany Pettersen (@RepPettersen) January 13, 2025

lmao, almost no sympathy in the comments,

[Started as a reply to some zoomer saying something stupid and spiraled out of control.]

Kennedy and his brother were really into telling the CIA to assassinate people overseas and do that kind of covert action in a dirty way. Everything you think is bad about glowies is probably something they ordered. Which makes it especially hilarious when tards claim that he, the least likely person on a planet of 3 billion people, was shot by the CIA because he didn't want them to assassinate people.

LBJ is responsible for getting us into Vietnam in the stupidest way possible, where it's treated as a crisis in the daily news cycle, not a war we're trying to win. And yet he keeps reinforcing failure, sending more and more guys there, dropping more and more bombs, killing more and more civilians. Drip by drip, make sure we're defeated in detail. Because we're not trying to win, we're just "sending a message" to them. Sorry b-word, but the guys fighting there, the Americans, the ARVN guys, the civilians, the NVA guys, they deserved to have more with their life than "sending a message" for him. The response from Hanoi was always "no frick off, we're trying to actually win the war." And LBJ was like an neurodivergent male feminist redditor hoping that maybe if he fed more guys into the meat grinder that she'd reply.

All this for a war that he doesn't believe we can win. And every time any adult points out that we might win if we go into Laos, he pisses his pants and says that's too scary for him. There's gotta be at least half a million people killed because of his moral cowardice. Sending the guys there with zero plan at all of what that they were doing except killing and dying to "send a message".

I still see r-slurred children today saying that "Henry Kissinger was a war criminal" because that was some hippie mantra. WTF does it even mean? I think originally it was trying to deflect blame from Pol Pot onto him or something. I guarantee you none of these tards know what it even was supposed to mean.

I never hear any kid today point out that we could have avoided this huge war and all the people killed on both sides and between them if Johnson had made literally any other decision. Either get out or go big and invade North Vietnam. He was too much of a kitty for the former because it would mean admitting a mistake. The latter would be risky but probably would be like 100,000 killed instead of the millions killed in the war and the genocide in Cambodia, and the next genocide in Cambodia when the Vietnamese did it. But he was too much of a kitty for that too.

The last one is ironic (Ed: BECAUSE IT'S THE OPPOSITE, IT'S A REPUBLICAN GETTING BLAMED FOR STUFF A DEMOCRAT DID): Reagan catches all this shit for sending weapons to Afghanistan and El Salvador. You know who started that, dumbass? Jimmy Carter. The Soviets decided to throw away detente, the attempt to lessen tensions between the superpowers in the 1970s, and just go back to full Stalinist map-painting mode like they're playing goddarn Hearts of Iron. Starting huge wars in Angola, Ethiopia, Nicaragua/El Salvador, invading Afghanistan, keeping their satellites going with Vietnam constantly fighting somebody. Those weapons weren't sent because Reagan, the actor who gets his face painted for his job, was more masculine than Carter, the nuclear submarine guy. It's because the Soviets started chimping out and you had to respond. But now leftoid kids think this was a bad thing so they assign blame for it to Reagan instead of Carter.

The new Starbucks CEO announced that Starbucks isn't a free hangout space anymore. That means you can only be in a Starbucks if you pay for something. This stops homeless people from living in a Starbucks and getting:

• Free water

• Free restrooms

• Free all-day hangout space

A common complaint on /r/starbucksbaristas is that the staff are tired of having to deal with homeless people - they spend all day in the stores, lock themselves in the bathroom for hours at a time while shooting up, and they often have to call the police. For example:

we STILL get annoying incidents, because our DM told us we cannot deny the bathroom to anyone unless in extreme situations. so even when a homeless person wants the restroom, we have to let them in, and most of them take anywhere from 40 mins to an hour in the restroom and it's our only restroom. so partners AND other customers are stuck waiting. we've had to call the police multiple times because they refuse to come out or are doing hard drugs inside. someone has left needles in there before. it's a weird situation.

So you'd assume that there would be unanimous happiness at this news? You're wrong! The thread is 99% against this change.

water is a human right and the private company that I work for must supply it for free!

The third place is a concept for paying customers, it's not a social club for the homeless.

Banning homeless people from keeping pets is the right option here.

I'm not going to sit in a Starbucks if there's a in the corner.

I'm waiting for the lawsuits!

lol no it's about making Starbucks a decent place to be a customer again.

I'd give anything to not be shadowbanned on /r/starbucksbaristas anymore. These guys piss me off so much.