They are using BMI to come to this conclusion. The index which puts heavily muscled people in the obese category...

No. That literally does not happen. You need to be roided to the gills eating 6 full meals a day and working out nonstop to even get close to being obese via muscle.

Imagine whatever you think the "male" version of this behavior in the workplace is like - maybe some performative jocky behavior between men - then ask yourself if women feel welcomed or alienated working in that environment. https://t.co/3loqq4u7mz

— AnechoicMedia (@AnechoicMedia_) February 1, 2025

Do you think if your boss posted a video of himself dancing at the office and chanting about his peepee this would dismissed as "guys having fun"? There is a lack of equal standards for workplace behavior for women.

— AnechoicMedia (@AnechoicMedia_) February 1, 2025

Someone manages to work in Visualizing The Apple and The Heatmap into gen z boss and a mini criticism

Visualize the apple + heat map

When you realize the vast majority of them cannot imagine what the other side thinks, you begin to understand why things are the way they are pic.twitter.com/MjvVAWMi5p

— Judefetzen (@mistermugabe) February 1, 2025

He missed incorporating the BQ but someone else has his back

This is the "How would you feel if you didn't ear breakfast this morning?" Question for women.

Some won't understand, but many will just answer "it's ok for us to behave this way, but not men, because muh patriarchy or muh made up wage gap."

— QuietStorm (@AudibleStorm) February 1, 2025

YWNBAT is a novel take

What Armand feels rage about is not being a "cute girl" having fun at the office

— Brian Little (@BrianSculling) February 1, 2025

SPAL jumpscare

Facts

We live in a matriarchy, not a patriarchy

And it needs to end

— Alex (@Marsey_Le_Tigre) February 1, 2025

This is the first time I've seen anyone rightly call out the scrote menace with regard to this though. So even after like a year on, the discourse is still evolving

The real problem is that guys want the cute girls in their workplace even if the girls destroy the work culture because they think there's a chance they might bone them.

— Dr. hbd nrx 🐸 (@HbdNrx) February 1, 2025

!misandrists

This is actually pretty strange. Maybe he's just some turbo neet addicted to the janny life. I'm not sure how he'd be making money from this. But it's creepy how these jannies weasel their way into more and more control.

I saw him on the front page earlier here

https://old.reddit.com/r/SeveranceAppleTVPlus/comments/1ie3wnc/severance_2x03_who_is_alive_episode_discussion/

Just a discussion thread, nbd. But I found a bunch of posts about him.

Sardines discussed him 2 weeks ago (removed of course)

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1i495u2/head_moderator_for_rtheboys_uloretitv_flagrantly/

That's a flagrant repost But he mops hard on any post that calls him out.

Not sure the rDrama rules here , but there is a private social media account with the same reddit username

sardines?

This redditor explains what he's doing

https://old.reddit.com/r/TheseFrickingAccounts/comments/1i19jjc/this_moderator_is_using_their_own_subreddit_as_a/

OR they have some sort of mental illness that drives them to see their fake internet points go up.

I'm leaning toward that, but I'll make a poll at the bottom.

Anotha one

https://old.reddit.com/r/TheseFrickingAccounts/comments/1i1dnd3/uloretitv_the_top_mod_of_rtheboys_reposts_their/

Couple more posts

https://old.reddit.com/r/exposingbadmods/comments/1hwd21b/loretitv/

janny making redditors seethe? Or cringe janny?

https://old.reddit.com/r/HOTDBlacks/comments/1hwz9h3/pathetic/

https://old.reddit.com/r/freefolk/comments/1e48xav/hardest_album_in_the_riverlands/

Redditors, I mean dramneurodivergents, discuss:

Back when he was signing USMCA he had this to say about it

And today, we're finally ending the NAFTA nightmare and signing into law the brand-new U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. (Applause.) Very special. Very, very special.

The USMCA is the largest, fairest, most balanced, and modern trade agreement ever achieved. There's never been anything like it. Other countries are now looking at it, but there can't be a border like that because, believe it or not, that is by far the biggest border anywhere in the world, in terms of economy, in terms of people. There's nothing even close.

This is a colossal victory for our farmers, ranchers, energy workers, factory workers, and American workers in all 50 states and, you could almost say, beyond — because it's all beyond. This is all over the world even though it's at one beautiful border — where, by the way, a very major powerful wall is, right now, being built. (Laughter.) Okay? I don't know if I should say that at this particular reading. I know last night it got a very big hand. (Laughter.) Today, they're a little bit like, "Are we supposed to clap now?" (Laughter.)

USMCA has a much weaker dispute resolution process than NAFTA did (something US producers absolutely loathe, Canadian provinces really love doing stupid shit with trade and they can't hold them accountable under USMCA like they could with NAFTA) where countries exchange & approve each others lists of potential dispute panelists. Even in the event daddy has updated this from Biden's list because the treaty requires all the countries to have agreed to changes its unlikely daddy will be able to front load it with yes men. It also allows Canada to just go around the US to the WTO.

The lumber is itself a great deal of lulz that has been going on for decades https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada%E2%80%93United_States_softwood_lumber_dispute but there are three new opportunities for $DRAMA inflation:

• Daddy really doesn't seem to understand how trade works, a tariff on Canadian oil would immediately increase the cost of gas & energy in the US. Just the comment he was thinking about doing it added more than a $1 to oil prices

• Daddy is going to have to argue why his own treaty sucks and why its totally Biden's fault his treaty sucks

• First challenge to congressional authority. Taxing is an enumerated power of congress and the ability of a president to create tariffs is limited. His pet theory is that the impoundment authority that lets sanctions work allows him to create any tariffs he wants. Congress have to choose between challenging daddy or setting a precedent that future presidents could use however they wanted. Bong's PM called you a mean name? 9001% tariffs on all bong goods.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/08/viral-trend-sees-humans-simulating-bizarre-ai-video-glitches/

!asians !aichads !fellas !kino

What are you playing currently?

!g*mers

Previous Iterations:

2025

2024

2023

Other rDrama vidya content

Last week's game: Satisfactory = (10*2+9*1+8*7+7*5+6*7+5*2+4*1+3*0+2*0+1*0)/(2+1+7+5+7+2+1+0+0+0) = 7.04

All Previous Games:

Game to Discuss?

Goat Simulator. I truthfully forgot about this game from the moment I last closed it (around 7 years ago) til about a week ago, when I'd forgotten whatever it was I'd originally wanted to say about Satisfactory. I have just under an hour of play time, representing a single playing session, and half-memories of the madcap mixture of genres, outright bugs, "bugs," and attempts at humor which probably come off as dated, even to the erudite and learned rdrama dot net. I guess there's also somehow a remaster of the game, which is if nothing else an indictment of our culture's inability to make anything new, instead preferring to "remaster" (theoretically) intentionally bad games. Discuss below, and vote in the pinned comment.

Future Games To Discuss

February 9: Synthetik

February 12: Braid

February 19: Disgaea

February 26: Bloons TD

carp capy geto ninjjer donger losercel rwby elfy pin please

🚨 This is NOT a joke. 🚨

The NIH and other government agencies have spent $10 MILLION injecting animals with hormones and performing surgeries to mimic gender transitions.

Oh, and it gets worse. They’re drugging animals to see how aroused they get.

You read that right. Your… pic.twitter.com/jCDqwM6QBq

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) February 3, 2025

"Bigot blaster" I love this

Gemerald and built for bbc

Seeing these two comments, one next to another, is just so beautiful

The #Groomer is trying to turn our children into freaks. https://t.co/o92QlF8E1o pic.twitter.com/sitBzuEVfi

— Darrin Bell (@DarrinBellArt) April 23, 2022

https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/darrin-bell-freelancer

anyway lets look at the works of his that won the pulitzer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darrin_Bell

bottom text

The happy Swedes decided to cap off a month where every day had a bomb attack or jihadi execution with a mass shooting

Motive currently unknown

https://apnews.com/article/sweden-shooting-adult-education-center-6be99a59fa3404ae296589e60c881f6c

About 10 people, including the gunman, were killed on Tuesday at an adult education center in what Sweden's prime minister called the country's worst mass shooting. But a final death toll, a conclusive number of wounded and a motive hadn't yet been determined hours later.

Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson gave a news conference in the aftermath of the tragedy, which happened on the outskirts of Orebro. The city is located about 200 kilometers (125 miles) west of Stockholm.

The school, called Campus Risbergska, serves students over age 20, according to its website. Primary and upper secondary school courses are offered, as well as Swedish classes for immigrants, vocational training and programs for people with intellectual disabilities.

"Today, we have witnessed brutal, deadly violence against completely innocent people," Kristersson told reporters in Stockholm. "This is the worst mass shooting in Swedish history. Many questions remain unanswered, and I cannot provide those answers either.

"But the time will come when we will know what happened, how it could occur, and what motives may have been behind it. Let us not speculate," he said.

Gun violence at schools is very rare in Sweden. But there have been several incidents in recent years in which people were wounded or killed with other weapons such as knives or axes.

Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer called the shooting "an event that shakes our entire society to its core."

While Swedes read about such violence in other places, Strömmer said that the country previously felt it wouldn't happen there. Other tragedies in Swedish schools weren't to the extent of Tuesday's attack, he said, calling it "indescribably sad" for the community.

CHOOSE YOUR CHARACTER:

https://old.reddit.com/r/MTFSelfies/comments/1e4401e/i_know_im_thicc_but_do_i_at_least_look_good_wo/

!nooticers

My favorite part about DOGE is how one of the guys will be some kind of insane prodigy who decoded the Herculaneum Papyrii at the age of 20 and the hit piece author’s bio trying to take him down is like, “associate staff writer for general topics, hobbies include having a cat.” pic.twitter.com/wgXE2RkVCL

— Payton Alexander (@AlexanderPayton) February 3, 2025

Never thought I'd have someone blowing up my phone

A later statement confirmed: "There has been a shooting at the school. Four people have been shot. The extent of the injuries is unclear. The operation is still ongoing.

That number has since been raised to five - while police also denied local reports that officers had been shot.

The shooting took place in a campus area which includes several schools for both children and adults.

Perhaps predictably, the men-aren't-reading discourse has made the jump into 2025. The perennial conversation has taken on new weight this year, though, as we begin to be governed by the worst of men, the putrid avatars of a hatefully reactionary masculinity. Increasingly, what's wrong with men is what's wrong with America. Would a reading list of novels enlighten them?

Right out of the gate this James Folta cute twink is blaming men for the state of America, naturally without being specific about that state.

And 'Would a reading list of novels enlighten them?', because of course the average man is simply too simple minded and must have his worldwide expanded to match that of some want to be elitist

The problem with the "dudes don't read" argument is that the numbers don't really seem to back the point up. Vox dug into the data behind the chatter in a piece titled "Are men's reading habits truly a national crisis?" which casts doubt on the statistics most often being cited, and poses some reasons why we might still be assuming men don't read anyway.

The Pew Research Center compiled findings from 2011 to 2021 that Americans read an average of 14 books and a median of 5 books annually. Younger people read more than over-65s, and more women read than men, but only by a little:

Pew's 2021 study says 73 percent of men say they've read a book in the past year, compared to 78 percent of women. Those numbers are up a tad from 2016, when 68 percent of men said they'd read a book compared to 77 percent of women. Overall, we're looking at pretty consistent stats over the course of the last decade: Roughly 70-ish percent of men read at least one book a year, and roughly 80-ish percent of women do. Meanwhile, according to the Department of Labor Statistics' American Time Use Survey of 2023, women spend on average 0.32 hours on leisure reading per day (about 19 minutes), while men's daily reading time averages out to about 0.2 hours (12 minutes).

It's not a huge gap. Constance Grady, the Vox writer, followed up on the stats with the researchers, and the new information she found brings us back to much the same place: the gender gap isn't that stark, nor does it seem to be moving much.

So statistically speaking, no one is really reading. But it's a problem for men because men seem to be doing more and more poorly, and reading is seen as a possible antidote. Vox again:

Reading fiction has assumed the same role as therapy in public discourse: something good for one's mental and emotional health that we should all do in order to be better citizens, and something that men—particularly straight men—are simply choosing not to do, to the detriment of society.

This last phrase is the weight behind the panic—broadly speaking, men seem to have fallen through some very rotten floorboards and into a much worse place. Which is to say, women could stand to read more too, but women aren't endangering as many people as men are—especially straight and white men, who I'm mostly talking about here.

I don't want to repeat myself but again what a massive cute twink. He's taken his boohooing about Trump winning and ham fistedly shoved into an article about men reading.

Why fill your head with other people's voices? It's too close, and could be a slippery slope to empathy.

!fellas just look at this shit! He frames it as if men don't read out of some fear that it would give us "empathy" like him. The very idea that any of us would be so easily swayed is frankly offensive.

For all the wonderful men that we all might know personally, the ascendent American male archetype is horrible—the hog-men of the political right in this country are wrecking and upturning everything. We've all felt the hot breath of these unwell and wicked men on the back of our necks this week.

More bitching that not everyone is as enlightened as he is.

Part of the identity of this fratty and crass man involves turning your back on books and everything they represent. This man reaches for force and bluster to hide "a bright seam of fear," as Rebecca Traister puts it. This man prizes business school efficiency and has no time for anything beyond grinding and maxing everything. This man is gleefully rude, unapologetically loud, aggressively in-motion, and perpetually in-the-way.

I can't imagine the amount of, I don't even know lack of self esteem? Elitism? Cute twinkry? It takes to be using fratty as an insult out of college.

It's not fear that causes me to not read more and certainly not a fear of empathy. It's a lack of interest. What am I going to read James? Some pseudo romance about women dealing with mean men? Yet another "young adult" novel clearly written by and for middle age women who never matured past highschool?

The last book I read that wasn't technical documentation or a short story was "The last argument of kings". I read it because it was interesting, it avoided the troupes of good triumphing over evil, of people changing for the better (interestingly his books have the opposite happen, with people trying to change only to become more themselves). It wasn't some predictable slop that I'd forget about in a week

This man, of course, doesn't read. The worst of them, Andrew Tate, once said that "Reading books is for losers who are afraid to learn from life. So they try and learn from the life OTHERS have lived."

Andrew Tate hasn't been even slightly relevant in years at this point, yet people like James keep bringing him up because it's a great way to paint your opponents as woman haters. He mean as well said "You know who else didn't like reading? Hitler!"

And he's not wrong. People like James here live variously thru what they read. They don't take morals and ethics from their own life, their own experiences instead they opt to parrot the opinions of the famous, to be sure to have the right opinions.

Zoë Hu published a sharp exploration of Tate's brutality in Dissent, which highlights not just the violence, but the loneliness of his lifestyle:

For him, power is a vehicle to admiration, and admiration is at variance with intimacy. To be admired by someone is to forever be at a distance from them, and this is where Tate prefers his women.

This aversion to closeness, which is an act of care which takes time and attention, would certainly cause a man to look at fiction with revulsion. Why fill your head with other people's voices? It's too close, and could be a slippery slope to empathy.

Once again James manages to actually offend me. To posit that I and men like me don't read because we're aversion to closeness, to human connection, to empathy is othering in it's most based form.

Of course it also makes James and his ilk out to be the good ones. The men who want closeness, empathy, connection. Who throw off their "fratty" and "hogish" nature to rise above.

And there aren't a lot of business tips in your average novel, either. Hu identifies Tate's mission as a perverse extreme of a dynamic seen elsewhere in the hustle-verse: "The worst excesses of masculinity find common cause in the dollar—it's all a business hustle." Seeing the people around you as exploitable ready-to-hand objects is not just cruel, but also lonely: "What men and boys learn from Tate, in other words, is how to optimize a life bereft of love or friendship." Reading a novel has no place in this matrix of domination.

But what is the case for reading, beyond that it differentiates you from the worst people around?

I've been wondering that since the first paragraph.

Even considering the "value" of a novel seems to be ceding ground to a false way of thinking, putting novels in competition, to be ranked and rated and graded.

All things have value. All things are ranked and graded. Nothing and no one is above this. To suggest otherwise is to move your field from one where actual hard benchmarks exists and into the world of vibes, a world where it doesn't matter how poorly you perform, how few people care what you think, how much better people different from you do, it's a world where you're right because you feel you're right

Reading is wonderful, but I'd have a hard time making the case that it's an unsinkable, objectively good thing that each and every person must do.

But you didn't let that stop you

And even people who I agree with sometimes treat books as a symbol of values they want to communicate, or as objects with rich veins of knowledge to be extracted. This turns a book into something to be consumed or summarized, implying that they're good, sure, but not always worth your time.

Because that's what books are. They contain information. Things you want to know, stories you want to hear, ideals you want to explore.

Novels can be hard too—how often have you been heartbroken that someone didn't connect with a book you recommended?

Never. Literally never have I been heart broken someone didn't like a book I did. I imagine this is because I have tolerance. Not the fake #BLM in the bio tolerance of people like James but an actual ability to tolerate those who don't think what I do or the way I do.

In the wake of David Lynch's death, I've been wondering about how to make the case for strange and challenging art. I don't think I could put it better than Michelle Dean did in her essay on Twin Peaks: The Return in Harper's: "There is no point, there is no conventional reason to watch, other than for the sheer enjoyment of the lurid but beautiful mind of David Lynch."

Which is a long winded and fancy way of saying "entertainment". The same reason people watch marvel movies and football games. That's right James you read for the same reason hogish and fratty straight white men watch football.

To me, this is the point: a novel may be difficult, but it's also a chance to experience something that is unique and unclassifiable. Reading novels is a singular way of approaching and understanding the world. This uniqueness means that novels can't be a one-size-fits-all solution, nor are books the only way to get closer to humanity, or imagine a better world, or to feel empathy for someone you may never meet. A book could fix a man, but it's not the only way to, and it's not a sure thing.

I almost agree with this. Of course books aren't unique. A speech, an essay, a good long chat can all have the same outcome.

There is part of me that is inclined to quietly allow people to enjoy what they enjoy, as long as it's not hurting anyone. You don't have to read. But there is another, larger part of me that is a hater: if you're a grown-up, you should be able to read a book. You should at least try! You shouldn't turn your back to the world—go to a museum, see a live show, meet your neighbor, help a friend, and call your parents.

What is he even on about at this point? At first men who didn't read were mean old Trumpers doing fascism and who were devoid of empathy, now they're shut ins who don't call mom and dad enough?

Not wanting to read the slop you do doesn't mean man has turned his back on the world god darn it!

All of these things are a chance to step outside of yourself and consider others. We like to imagine men reading because it's a vision of a man who is patient, sensitive, and restrained. A man reading is a man pausing and thinking, not a man acting or reacting. It's seductive to extrapolate this image: a nation of men reading might be a place that is more considerate, a place that lifts up everyone, with bread for all, and roses too.

Above all else, a man reading is silent. In short, and even though it won't solve everything, my advice to my fellow American men is to shut the frick up and read a novel.

And there we have it! The TL:DR! Men should read because it makes them shut up, makes them stop voicing their opinions, voting for their candidates.

This entire article was pointless, reading is somehow both essential and optional, both one of many ways to better ones self but also the way to fix men, men should read because it fosters thoughtfulness, patience, and open-mindedness but also because it makes them shut the frick up.

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

This isn't mild. This is trashy (347)

The car, you mean? (44)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Its stainless steel tho, right? This should wipe right off. (33)

What if it's self etching? (3)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

[removed] (583)

TikTok ahh censorship (33)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Some asswipe that does this to another person's property deserves an butt whipping.Someone is going to get the crap beaten out of them if caught and I'm sure the anti Musk Reddit fricks will scream bloody murder.Also in some states, vandalism of a car that does not belong to you is a felony. Yep, go to prison and have your life ruined because you don't like Elon. (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Wow. So vandalism is okay with you? Sadly I'm not surprised. Your tolerance is pretty thin. And you scream police brutality when arrested for committing crimes. If the driver had gotten out, and a fight started, you'd be screaming on reddit about how a racist attacked and beat the man. Found out he was .01 percent native American and then screamed it was a hate crime attack. Then protested. Same old same old. (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I dont think it's a great vehicle. I dislike Elon. Tesla is overrated.But wtf did this guy do to deal with this crap? He's already made the mistake of buying this thing, now he's gotta deal with buttholes who do entitled shit for views?This is just fricking stupid. (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/TheDookeyman

Score: 🐮🐮🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

So Ferrari guy felt bad about me staying home and ended up buying me a ticket and hotel room for the week. When was the last time your friend dropped $2500 on you and didn't expect anything sexual in return?

The only thing that could go wrong is I'm bringing my camera bag, which my insurance just cancelled because they apparently needed me to get a second appraisal as apparently the first one wasn't good enough for them. It came to $32k the first time. Anyways, if anything happens to it I'm fricked.

!cuteandinvalid !lgbt !nonchuds DO BETTER WTF

https://old.reddit.com/r/ftm/comments/1icofmk/does_anyone_resent_how_little_effort_cis_men_put/

The code is NERDS ROPE to activate Nick's r-slurred Manchurian Candidate to 'take care of' Dasha

I wish we left gastronomy to the neighbors. These b-words suck. Your oatmeal cookies suck. Your TikTok casserole sucks. Hoes need to be led by a real kitchenmaster, a real Chef de Cuisine. A man of the senses, a supertaster. All these whores care about is keeping up 'trad' appearances for the only stomach-wormed r-slur willing to eat their lousy sandwich-and-curly-fry meals. These broads couldn't care less about feeding their families, let alone having children at all. At least the matriarchs of then knew how to forage and be resourceful. All you b-words do is scroll Pinterest for another cupcake fad you can lie about recreating.